Is he based?
Is he based?
Other urls found in this thread:
bjs.gov
twitter.com
Yes, /k/elly is /our/ boy
absolutely
Like Archie Bunker, Ed Anger, and Eric Cartman, he was meant to satirize right wing views, but ended up being so on point that people loved him unironically.
Today i will remind them.
This is what kelly thinks is "Satire"
The real artist is a retard
Bear with me for a sec here. What if "Kelly" IS the real artist, and the "real artist" is the satire? Think about it.
Thats so crazy
How could we prove it
Simple: he speaks the truth the loudest when we have comics like this.
I wish people would stop thinking guns are the problem, and look more at the always-rising mental health issues in society and try and address that. Not to go full Ted K. but there seems to be something in the modern world that's driving people loony, and drugs aren't a solution to that nor is banning guns.
We need both stricter gun control and better mental health care.
I'm not disagreed with you, 30,000 homicides a year in a population of 375 million is absolutely fucking nothing, but shieeet mang did you have to kick start the political shitstorm this early?
sooo he literally draws kids armed with guns when all school shootings were made by kids.. and drawing the sico is he drawing himself? wasnt he like exposed as a pedo not long ago?
This. Pic related is the real culprit
Americans are the problem.
Melanin-enriched individuals are the problem.
We need to:
>allow teachers the option to arm themselves.
>ensure police are better managed under leaders who will actually send them in to solve situations.
>adopting basic security in a school (smokescreen system, not putting your fancy locked entrance next to a perfectly average window for example.)
>understand and accept the contextually small amount of life lost to this problem.
>realize that police already blow off gun laws unless they want to catch someone on a technicality.
>stop pretending we're ever going to really care about the hangups of the sociopathic social retards that can't hack it.
>stop pretending we'll ever have a system to catch every genuinely crazy person.
There are any number of ways to react appropriately here but that doesn't include more useless gun laws, or lip service to healthcare we will never follow through on. Neither will be enough and the same people will come back again with yet more laws and calls to solving the mental health crisis.
This has potential as a meme template. Can't believe I don't remember this one.
what we need are more ass beatings
no
It's actually both.
>understand and accept the contextually small amount of life lost to this problem.
Fuck RIGHT off with that. Leftists all over Europe argue like that with the muslim rapes.
Fact is, if they had never let them in, nobody would have gotten raped in the first place.
I will not accept anything of that.
And what you are suggesting is equally as "unrealistic", to call it that, as the other suggestions you are rejecting. You call for more and better police. That's the same as calling for better mental health care. Both will certainly be merely a lip service, but one of them - if actually applied - can actually treat the disease instead of alleviating the symptoms and every sane person will prefer that.
That said, I don't really think we would need all that if people were just nicer towards each other. And sterilize the poor and crazy. Shitheads are made at home; people who just can't parent simply should not be able to have kids, PERIOD.
No guns are also the problem. All because we have genuine issues with our mental health system does not excuse the many flaws of the way we distribute firearms.
That's the issue we're dealing with. How overly simplistic people try to deal with incredibly dense issues.
>Conservatives not getting that it's a joke.
Conservatives have no sense of humor. And water is wet.
can't tell if shitpost or isn't aware Kelly is satire
SHALL
>I wish people would stop thinking guns are the problem, and look more at the always-rising mental health issues in society and try and address that.
Crazy people have existed forever. Murders per capita are down at the a level they were at in the 60s. Violent crime, the early 70s.
You can't make crazy people sane, but you can make them less effective killers.
>he unironically agrees with Kelly
>30,000 homicides a year
Actually that's gun deaths in total which lumps in suicides, accidents, and homicides under one stat. The actual number is closer to 15,000 homicides caused by guns, 90% of them being caused by handguns and the Vast majority being commited with illegally obtained weaponry.
>something in the modern world that's driving people loony
Alternatively: people have always been loony but now that the world is becoming more and more sane people are beginning to notice
The difference is that the crazy can now spread via the internet. In my opinion you could already do lots of good if you restricted internet to business and academics.
>but you can make them less effective killers.
And banning gun would do jack shit
>and the Vast majority being commited with illegally obtained weaponry.
That's wormy language. Illegally obtained doesn't mean illegally provided. The vast majority of illegally obtained weapons were provided legally.
Fences make a living by not asking stupid questions. As long as they don't traffic in enough volume to be subject to FFL requirements they can and do sell guns without background checks legally to people that can't legally own guns. All the guns sold on street corners and out of car trunks are being sold by "lawful" gun owners to gangs and the like and it can't be stopped because the seller is on the up and up as far as our current shitty gun laws are concerned.
Back up your scapegoat, 56%er.
Niggers are the problem though
>The vast majority of illegally obtained weapons were provided legally.
source?
I wish people would post about comics and cartoons on the comics and cartoons board.
gun is a useful tool against a crazy killer is it not? guns aren't the culprit - see: Nice truck attack
these guys get famous BECAUSE they are so uncommon
bjs.gov
Among prisoners serving time for crimes involving a gun
22% guns bought legally by a criminal before they became a criminal or they didn't bring the gun involved
43% bought em from a fence of some sort
17% got them through explicitly illegal means like a straw purchase or theft
15% got them through friends and family with this being a mix of legal and illegal transfers
The biggest group by far is grey market sales.
>gun is a useful tool against a crazy killer is it not?
If you're asking me whether I'd prefer to have a gun vs a crazy person with a gun or not have a gun vs a crazy person without a gun. The answer is the latter.
There were plenty of other Asian school shooters.
They just didn't receive much attention.
This isn't a great one. I prefer the ones that are less close to actual postions of some people.
You can't choose what a crazy person is coming at you with. The black market for firearms is stronger than ever in that perfect country Australia despite the buyback and strict rules. The crazy guy who held up that Lindt cafe bought his gun from a criminal
You do realize most gun laws will leave you in the situation of
>you without a gun and a crazy person with a gun
right?
>You can't choose what a crazy person is coming at you with
Certainly if you don't try you can't.
>The black market for firearms is stronger than ever in that perfect country Australia despite the buyback and strict rules.
Which is why their murder rate has cratered since they implemented stricter gun laws.
Fear monger to someone closer to your iq, next time, m8. I've done nothing to lose my gun rights. Stricter background check laws wouldn't impact me in the least.
You seem to be under the delusion that people want a total gun ban.
Does every country have a much higher number of school shootings than Americans?
Cratered? As in you see the murder rate going back up?
>You seem to be under the delusion that people want a total gun ban.
You seem to be under the delusion that they don't
try again
Back up your scapegoat.
What you wrote doesn't make sense. You are the guy who thinks the mental health of nations isn't as important as the restriction of firearms weapons? My guy, if the mental health of society is further, soon every other human becomes a threat. You trust the oncoming traffic not to veer into your lane, right? That trust is founded on the mental health of the population being 'good'
Oh come on, white trash is also problem. They own illegal guns too.
>As in you see the murder rate going back up?
>current murder rate .94 per 100k
>murder rate before gun control 1.6 per 100k
If it's going back up it's got a long fucking while to climb because of how damn far it fell afterwards.
>You seem to be under the delusion that they don't
Well I don't so you're an asshole. Please don't tell me what I believe.
I mean it's not like most of the people championing gun ownership are campaigning on giving people easier access to mental health care either. Hell right now the Republican party is working on dismantling people's existing health care systems and they don't even know what they plan to replace it with yet.
I believe in the 2nd amendment, but if people want to argue that guns aren't the problem and all these other things are then the NRA and other pro-gun Americans actually need to put their money where their mouths are and do something about it.
>sterilize the poor and crazy.
Or at least let them have abortions.
>but if people want to argue that guns aren't the problem and all these other things are then the NRA and other pro-gun Americans actually need to put their money where their mouths are and do something about it.
The flaw in your argument is in assuming the gun nuts believe their own bullshit. It is an official stance of the NRA that a mental health diagnosis does not and should not disqualify you from having a firearm.
But user, US politicians (albeit dumb ones) have called for a for a total ban on rifles, hand guns, joked about whether anyone need a firearm of any kind, all within the last year
You were the one who suggested the murder rate was cratering. Do you know what that implies? The fact is it was already trending downward
Do it in the US. I wanna see how long before kids start shooting each other and the teachers.
Incredibly.
I'm aware of attempts to regulate certain kinds of rifles and handguns, but that's hardly a total gun ban. And a joke is just that.
>The fact is it was already trending downward
And that fact is it started trending downward faster. Compare the few years before and after the ban. It went from a slight to a heavy downward trend.
Also whether or not it was already trending downward is irrelevant to whether or not it cratered, which it did. Clearly guns do jack and shit to prevent crime, else you'd expect it to trend UPWARD.
Do you want to know how I know you consume nothing by onions?
Whenever there is an armed bystander that chooses to intervene, there is a 3/4 chance that the shooting will stop.
No, you wouldn't, because Australian law prevents the use of lethal force in self-defense. Correlation does not imply causation
Places with less guns have less gun related deaths. Shocking, I know. Sure, mental health is important, but in KKonaland you can buy a gun as long as you can get to a firearms store and speak. Then go shoot up an office or whatever.
>Australian law prevents the use of lethal force in self-defense
I don't know which is worse, that you believe that or that you thought I would.
In one case, you're brain damaged and the other case you think I am.
Please look it up because no it doesn't.
Places with less guns have less murders in general.
have they sued?
Forgot I had this saved. The homicide rate in Australia began declining noticeably faster after the gun regulations were put in place. There was one anomalous year right after but past that it dropped like a rock. Before that it was declining, but only barely.
This. You don't need to take guns away from those that are trained and have licenses to carry arms. Just make sure it's not as easy as buying one from a gun show. Let the responsible people carry guns all they want, it's the ones that are most likely to shoot up a place that need to be looked at. That also means making sure homes that have guns aren't getting their weapons taken by others like kids or thieves.
The gun show loophole isn't even about gun shows. It's about street corners. I fucking hate that name, the loophole is ALL PRIVATE TRANSFERS NOT INVOLVING A FFL.
Except you neglect to mention that the homicide rate dropped for all crimes, not just gun-related ones. So, gun control had nothing to do with it.
I like when his complaints are very specific and aimed at someone in particular, like his kids complaining about his drinking, or his DUI arrest.
What is this data? Just some dots
Suppose people are more heavily armed in response to the level of violence existing in their state. Your graph doesn't contain much information
That's a nice statistic you presented with no data. Also notice that it doesn't mention any possible negatives like the bystanders shooting the wrong person or getting shot by the police.
Also I'm not sure why I'm being called an onion eater when I said I support the 2nd amendment.
So most of them are still bought illegally.nice try kike.
not in the same rate as niggers. Try again.
I don't quite approve of this style.It feels off.
>That's a nice statistic you presented with no data.
As opposed to gun grabbers with no statistics to support their retarded bullshit whatsoever.
>Also I'm not sure why I'm being called an onion eater when I said I support the 2nd amendment.
They don't call your retarded kind a fudd for nothing.
It's not that hard to put security in schools. Also cops in most other areas have a response time of three minutes. Liberal cops like Sheriff Israel want kids to die so they don't actually do their job when a drugged up kid shows up to enact revenge. If they ban Islam, then we can talk about taking basic human rights. Muslims kill way more than one random atheist kid listening to Manson.
Victim of the Boston bomber