CONFIRMED: No changing the future, only creating multiverses

If you think Evans is ever playing him again, old or otherwise, you're silly.

>Logically, simply arriving generates a branching
>Anyway you can't put it back like banner implied, the moment they were taken away
You just arrive 1 attosecond after they left. Then there's no branching because you didn't overlap any continuity.

You don't put them back the moment they were taken from where they had been stored, you return to just after the point where the stone left the timeline and then manually put it back where it should be.

>Because all travelling is done to the past.
>The movie takes place 5 years after the events of infinity war
Nothing is stopping the avengers from heading to a point in an alternate universes past where the avengers best Thanos in infinity war.

Why can't Steve go back in time and yank Tony from this timeline's past and bring him back to the present? Like Gamora, Nebula and Thanos?

Because it would fuck over that timeline pretty hard.

That might be the worst drawing of Natalie Portman I've ever seen.

It is a different guy.

Isn't this that SU artist that got worse?

The irony of the whole Spider-man belonging to Sony is that I think Spider-man might actually work better as a TV series than a series of films. Spider-man's usually at his best during street-level shenanigans and smaller stakes, and I kind of feel like the movies don't leave a lot of room for that, and as a result, doesn't get to grow much on his own without Stark or Fury driving the plot.