Following my DC issues yesterday and questions about the quality of the art, here is #384 the last issue written by Gardner Fox He had been one of the original writers in the 1930s and 40s filling it for Bill Finger because of his slow pace. He created the Baterang and Utility Belt. Julius Schwartz brought him back in 1964 as part of the new look revitalisation, although in my opinion there wasn't much change the designs were still squat and stocky. In 1968 Fox was among a group of old timer writers and artists that had been working National for decades, since beginning, and getting on in years they wanted to discuss... a pension plan. And they wanted to do it through... a union. National fired them all.
That's fucked up. Eat the rich. That cover looks awesome- Batman looks like a bruiser.
Angel Taylor
The previous thread: >Inspite of what everyone says, it was Frank Robbins who kick-started the new age of Batman, where Dick leaves for college, and Batman moves out of Wayne manor and starts a detective agency. Yeah I've seen his byline in some of these issues, was he brought in to replace Gardner? Have they ever brought back the detective agency? Seems like it would be a neat way to reintroduce some of their gumshoe characters that preceded Batman + give him some extra eyes. >Kind of making me think of Gil Kane for some reason, but I think Kane was over at Marvel at this time. His Wikipedia page lists 374 in his bibliography I knew about the McKeever version of events never heard that Chaykin had also adapted it, I've seen interviews where he was referred cryptically to his morals and people giving him shit for being friends with him :\ I'm not disputing they'd wear suits but they seem to be of an older heavier and 3-piece style
I think Giordano was doing the covers at this point Even though the interior art of most issues was still fairly antiquated, I posted 374 because it had art that was an exception and I felt that's where things began changing for Batman, the covers had picked up quite a bit
>Yeah I've seen his byline in some of these issues, was he brought in to replace Gardner? Actually checking the comicbookdb his writing credits go back to 378
What should I look at next for charting the development of Batman? Is there anything from the Batman comics people would suggest, mostly just been looking through Detective as their downloads complete Some of the issues have digital recoloring which doesn't look right imho :\
>Barbara things a guy that has only ever checkedout old newspapers is two-timing her N-Nani?! Batgirl is Yandere!?
Austin Mitchell
>I knew about the McKeever version of events never heard that Chaykin had also adapted it, I've seen interviews where he was referred cryptically to his morals and people giving him shit for being friends with him :\
Yeah, he adapted it last year. I forget which issue it was in though.
Jack Mitchell
The McKeever comic was also last year
Isaiah Roberts
The issue with the Archie Goodwin stand-in talking about McKeever was out in 2016, though.
The quibble I had with it is that the Goodwin stand-in was saying it happened during his time as EIC of Not-Marvel, but in real life Goodwin was EIC from 1976 to 1977. But then I found Robert Stanley Martin's blog at rsmwriter.blogspot.com/2016/06/jim-shooter-second-opinion.html where Martin said:
>Oh, I see. This is about Kane. There's not a lot that's on the record. People for the most part aren't willing to discuss it for public consumption. They'll at most obliquely refer to it, such as Howard Chaykin with negative references to Kane's "ethics," or Jim Shooter describing theft incidents involving "an artist who shall remain nameless," or Al Milgrom explaining Kane's 1982 blackballing at Marvel as being due to his not being qualified as a human being to work there. But off the record, people with direct knowledge of the situation get pretty pointed when discussing him and his conduct. When I say it was "well known," I mean it was "well known" to people who were there at the time. If you don't want to accept that, I understand. I'm not big on anonymously sourced statements myself.
The 1982 date makes more sense because if you look at Kane's bibliography on wiki, it cuts off after 1983, for the Marvel Fanfare issues that had the Jungle Book adaptation. Since Marvel Fanfare is like an inventory book that story might've been done earlier, or been his last commitment before the banning. So maybe McKeever exaggerated or misremembered, or Archie Goodwin made a mistake and was thinking of when he was editor of the Epic line (which would've been in the 80's).
That said, Gil Kane did do two things for Marvel after 1983: the lead story for Web of Spider-Man Annual #6, and a few pages for Marvel Heroes and Legends in 1997. I don't know what the story on how he was allowed to do them, maybe special circumstances or something.
Xavier Hernandez
oh 2016 okay my mistake Presumably McKeever heard the story from Goodwin Yeah it cuts at 1983 as I said in the previous thread
If he was working as a contract or work-for-hire he might not have been allowed in the building, didn't McKeevers comic make a big deal about them doing that?
Elijah Garcia
Since I cant figure out what to do next or what Batman # to do I'm just gonna go with DC 385 This is an early Neal Adams cover, Batmans ears and cape are still short, and the body is squat and rounded rather than tall and lean Nice looking Batgirl too
Two other old timers Bob Kanigher and Bob Brown who must not have been part of the organising effort write and illustrate this Brown was also the illustrator for Daredevil in between the Gene Colon and Frank Miller runs By the mid-1970s Brown seemed to have a hard time working in the changing industry >comics historian Mark Evanier recounted that by this point, Brown >...found his work regarded as "old-fashioned". It wasn't so much that Brown couldn't take a more modern approach to his work as that he just plain didn't understand what that meant. Editors kept showing him the work of new artists, he told me. They'd say, "This is what we want now," but Brown couldn't grasp just what it was he was supposed to learn from the examples, which often struck him as displaying weak anatomy, poor perspective and other fundamental errors. It was almost like they were telling him that, "Kids relate to crude artwork," and he knew it wasn't that. newsfromme.com/2004/12/07/on-the-passing-of-bob-haney/
Jason Ortiz
D'OH! THATS IS 389 Brown also replaced Kirby on Challengers of the Unknown after he went back to Marvel
>didn't McKeevers comic make a big deal about them doing that?
They started doing that around the time McKeever turned in his last comic for Epic. (Carl Potts stand-in says that it was the last day freelancers were allowed in the building, ) According to wiki his last Marvel/Epic comic was in 1993, so at the time Kane got banned in the 80's, freelancers were still allowed to show up at Marvel's offices.
yeah and the couple comics he did for them in the 1990s would have been freelance and so wouldn't that mean at that time he wouldn't have been allowed in the building
The 1997 comic probably would've been after the freelancer ban. The Web of Spider-Man Annual was from 1990 (before the overall ban), though. I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't allowed in, though.
KaneKaneKane! Why not talk about the punks in editorial like Jim Salicrup who had tables at CreationCon selling stolen art and taking orders for later dealz?
To be honest folks 386 and 388 are pretty blah, and 387 is a recreation of #27 chemical conspiracy for the 30th anniversary (didn't they do that in the 1990s as well?) So on to 389 properly this time unless there some alternative suggestions I really should look through the Batman of this era as well see how the art and stories were changing, so strange that for much of the era DC were still doing 50s type stuff while Marvel was just exploding
Looks like at this point they've started to try to distance the comic from the TV show, yet I can't help but read this Batman dialogue in Adam West's voice.
Parker Ward
what do people think of digital recoloring btw? some of the subtly seems to be gone Anyway we have another Neal Adams cover and this time he is really looking Neal-ish Frank Robins and Bob Brown are back for writing and pencils
Around this time Robin was going off to college and Bruce moved into Gotham city but you can back even a few issues and they're driving the series batmobile
Honestly the next couple issues are again pretty blah 390 is about Batmans tailor 391 is about a woman who thinks she is married to Batman I mean, is this 1955? Here though 392 has a very nice nourish atmosphere Adams cover Robbins and Brown script and pencils
If you have a problem with digital recoloring check out the MTCDC-NMC torrents from tpb. It has every DC comic until 2010 I think, and there all scans.
No seeders on most of them though. Check out the-eye.eu/public/Comics/DC Chronology/ there sorted by year and month published. It's a pain in the ass to download from there but I just got everything from 1935-1989 in just a couple of days. There is also libgen.io
So I'm gonna do 393 its kinda bluh but it is important for the fact that this is where Dick Grayson goes off to college One of the major changes to the comics that Frank Robbins was responsible for Then I'm gonna go Batman 217 cause I have been looking through the folder on what to do from it and it appears to follow on from it with Robin away and Batman now alone
Its an Irv Novick cover Robbins and Brown back for script and pencil
Oh and I missed this when posting it but apparently the previous issues Batgirl backup was the first appearance of Jason Bard :\
So it turns out he moved to the City and founded the agency all in one issue The story continues into DC 394 Adams cover Robbins and Brown script and pencils
>Denny O'Neill has entered the chat Returning to my original post, the reason why a lot of the new artists and writers got hired was because of all the old timers that got mass fired