What went wrong with capeshit?

Attached: IMG_20190426_210030.jpg (4096x3222, 3.07M)

Rundown on starman? Saw his fig at a shop recently but was unaware of him.

Nothing, there are plenty of good and bad books both now and in the past.

Starman was one of the first non-7 DC books I read.
Was pretty good. The ending was incredibly satisfying.
I don't know about the new Hawkman one. Was it bad?

There was very little right in the first place.

You need to read Starman, user. It's a legacy character done right and one of the best runs in superhero comics.

One is an example of good comic from the past and one is an example of good comic from the present. The standards of good comics have changed so much. Jurgens is considered to be a master of the medium now.

Hipsters. They made them expensive, "whimsical and simultaneously edgy", and "woke".

How has the standard change?
Any other examples aside from this?

Starman is about a middle aged hipster and his whimsical antique shop.

Adults hijacked what were meant to be simplistic children’s adventure stories because they couldn’t grow up themselves.

There's barely anything adult in today's capeshit. It's all epic stories, lolsrandumb concepts and comfy feels.

See Rebirth.

Capeshit has been the bottom of the barrel of entertainment since its inception.

Not an actual argument

>Jurgens is considered to be a master of the medium now.
Odd position to have since it's been years since Jurgens wrote something that anyone gave much of a shit about.

>Jurgens is considered to be a master of the medium now.
I mean should Robinson be considered a master of the medium either?

The Shade mini from the New 52 is a comparative masterpiece to everything that has come out in the past decade.

People still miss him on Action Comics.

Yeah, but it used to be cheap fun

The internet

I remember liking his Thor stuff