Debate me
Debate me
Other urls found in this thread:
comicvine.gamespot.com
twitter.com
At what?
I think that's a e-celeb's avatar, but I can't remember who.
i thought it was seth the programmer
It is
superman beats goku
Actual debates are a flawed process. People who ask for debates are usually the ones that have fallen victim to being on the losing end of one before, and thus they have a strong urge to debate someone on the very thing they lost about originally, to try and use the same tactics that the person who triumphed over them used.
This is why only fools get into debates. It is far better to decide something based on the evidence you yourself gather.
what kind of faggot calls themselves chuck the cyber cuck?
Gathering evidence yourself is tiresome and unproductive.
Looked up the name and google says he's a powerlevelfag with some drama in that community.
Does the Dragon Ball franchise really have such a poor story and poor characters that fights are the only thing the fans ever talk about?
Oh shut up. Yea Forums literally has a 400-post thread up right now where the vast majority of people is crying about how ebil nu writers introduced depth and direction to comics and how it used to be so much better in the 60s where it was just "hero punch villain and quip for 20 pages".
I don't read capeshit and that doesn't answer my question.
But for some reason you're in a shonen thread, which is the Jap equivalent of capeshit???
It's a thread about 60's/70's/80's mainstream comics which were a hell of a lot deeper as a whole (besides DC's silver age which ended in the late 60's) than most modern fluff from the 90's to today with only a relative few exceptions (I guess vertigo is a bigger exception but whatever). If you actually knew about comics you'd understand that.
Did you end up on Yea Forums by accident? Genuine question.
One of the first links on google
comicvine.gamespot.com
Fucking what?
>comicvine
I don't even need to click the link to know what that is.
Already did after the first Goku/Superman video, I soundly proved his "evidence" was bullshit and he never had the balls to admit it.
>It's a thread about 60's/70's/80's mainstream comics which were a hell of a lot deeper as a whole (besides DC's silver age which ended in the late 60's) than most modern fluff from the 90's to today with only a relative few exceptions (I guess vertigo is a bigger exception but whatever). If you actually knew about comics you'd understand that.
Yeah, I guess Human Torch fighting Paste-Pot Pete is an incredibly deep story, riddled with complex symbolism for humanity's eternal struggles, alluding to the works of Plato himself. Do you ever take the time to listen to yourself?
Another excelent version of Bardock.. However, there is one bad version of bardock.. Right Minus?
>GO TO HELL MINUS AND GINE.
That's not Bardock.
>all comics of this 30 year era are represented by a single cherry picked example
You don't even try, do you?
More like you're trying to pretend thatvall the works of that era, or even the majority of them, were like Moore's Swamp Thing and not like Human Torch vs. Paste-Pot Pete
More like you can't stand the fact that not everything is silverage retardation in that entire 3 decade period despite Dragon Ball remaining as such and even devolving in a similar time frame. Now tell me how deep and profound modern mainstream comics are as a whole faggot, preferably with more than one writer.
Goku is a bitch and out of all the fucking death battles you "debunk" you debunk the most clear cut battles no debate episodes. Like you could've done
Daredevil vs Nightwing
Wolverine vs Raiden
Thor vs Wonder Woman
Dr.Strange vs Dr.Fate
Tara Strong vs Tara Strong
and probably more.
he said goku would still lose to most versions of superman but the death battle was retarded and purposely made goku look worse, like when they used start of z goku's speed to represent end of z goku