Why is cartoon nudity okay when it's a boy but it's completely over the line if it's a girl?
And you can't tell me it's pedos on account of there's Catholic priests and Jerry Sandusky.
Why are American cartoons so scared of female bodies?
Why is cartoon nudity okay when it's a boy but it's completely over the line if it's a girl?
Other urls found in this thread:
male nudity is considered funny because its a jab at our masculinity
We just had a cartoon with loli cunny. Your argument is outdated, you pedophile
oh, it's you again
Leela and Amy were naked how many times again?
Powerpuff girls and samurai jack
Female nudity can be funny, but it's harder to pull off. It's also easier to get away with if you have women doing the writing/animation/storyboarding. I don't think a man could have gotten away with Skadie.
Is there a specific line in any network's S&P guidelines saying they can't show naked lolis? I know there are certain things like alcohol and smoking they usually won't allow on kids' shows, but I have no idea about that.
Federal anti child porn laws
It's just funnier when a guy is naked
Pretty sure he meant 2D loli, you baka.
It's okay to target people in positions of power.
Because it's America
It's France alright.
Dangly parts.
Anything Except Big Mouth?
Yes
In human culture, female bodies were always in much higher regard than male bodies because of how important women are biologically. Dudes are pretty much expendable, while girls are supposed to be cherished. Hence why male nudity is funny, but female nudity is not.
It should also be mentioned that this industry is dominated by dudes, and they would be more comfortable drawing naked boys rather than naked girls.
What a cringy comment.
Whether you punch up or down, you're still punching someone, and what does that make you?
A clown.
More importantly, You have a whole picture?
Thanks. Now I need something that rhymes with orange, a synonym for geese, and a barbershop quartet who can perform this masterpiece.
I think he means that particular law in non-retarded countries. It's classified under it.
Misogyny
it's not complicated.
I'm pretty sure that fire mhymes with orange.
But i use to think my life is tragedy!
Now I see it was a comedy.
only pedos complain about this
If OP was one he won't complain.
OP is a lolifag, that's why he is complaining
Some asshole with boxing gloves on
>comment
Pls leave
Okay since you ask.
Because all the examples in that image are shows directed at boys, so it's deemed harmless.
It's a similar situation to locker rooms.
>directed at boys
How so?
The shows centre around male characters at a young age and focuses on addressing themes that boys are into and find relatable.
Yes, girls watch the shows as well, nobody is stopping them, but the target audience is boys and thus the show is written around that.
Cartoons aren't for girls. Easy bake ovens are
A boy is fine too
Genndy agrees.
Why have you saved these images?
That's fucking weird, user.
I'm not OP, user.
My Dexter pic is in good quality.
They weren't children though. It doesn't count if they aren't children.
It also doesn't count if you provide a valid counterargument, since clearly nobody actually cares.
Nowhere near as many as Fry. Honestly, the only times I can remember, it was the whole cast, so you had to look at the professor naked too. Sort of an ugly nude guy tax.
we what now
The panties never came off!
censors flip out at any female bare chests because "oh no that's sexual" so as a result cartoonists would have to draw them with more ironic cover which is more work
meanwhile drawing a boy bare ass naked and walking off into the sunset gets 0 scorn from censors so it's an easy gag to make
most censors are women btw
>naked lolis
The fact that you call them that shows your lack of self-awareness.
>Whether you punch up or down, you're still punching someone
The ultimate centrist, big yikes.
>only pedos complain about this
But most pedos like boys
Loli doesn't mean little girl, it means little girl in a sexual context. Yeesh.
Also OP, no male nipples. Guess when you read the Bible literaly something gies wrong in your brains. A lot of pagan traditions still survived in Europe so the Church had to let some slip bye.
when its a girl, its weird. you shouldnt need to be told this. the only example you gave id be concerned with is steven universe, since the show doesnt usually gel with that style of humour and frankly the crewniverse strike me as a gang of degenerate pedos anyway
also add that unlike other places usa culture was heavily influenced by the pilgrims and other puritanical groups. remember that we've had witch burnings and a lot of them were sexy young women. as a rule we had a sexually repressed culture until other cultures from less repressed areas gained more influence and the mainstream still resists based on the combination of nature like you said and the puritan "nurture" of early america and the people who influenced gov and culture
I’d rather be a centrist than poisoned by the polarized attitudes of one side or the other.
Bart has nipples in the movie.
youtube.com
It's because people inherently sexualize the female body, even a child's. So while a cartoon can have a naked guy and people will go "haha, a butt," if they show a female character's ass I promise you there would be a dozen threads about it on here for at least a week.
>criticizing people in power makes you a radical libertarian
simple misandry
witch burnings were pretty much used to settle grudges and remove poweful rivals or competitors or just people you didnt like. guy and girls that had too much sex appeal or were too risque were in danger all the time
this too. i think its a mix of all kinds creating this fuckery
Because we respect women, that's why we got a lot of waifuthreads