>women are 70% of CalArts students
>men get 75% of the jobs
How is it possible that even when everyone stacks the deck in favor of women, men still manage to get most of the jobs in this industry? Pisses me off.
>women are 70% of CalArts students
>men get 75% of the jobs
How is it possible that even when everyone stacks the deck in favor of women, men still manage to get most of the jobs in this industry? Pisses me off.
Other urls found in this thread:
theguardian.com
money.com
thebolditalic.com
twitter.com
Must be the patriarchy.
Men are naturally better at arts.
It's Leonardo da Vinci, not Laquona Johns
Maybe the men are better at what they do?
Women lack the ambition of men. There are exceptions. But it's true.
most of those females are disgusting asians that all draw the same
I don't understand the logic you're using. If there's a new trend of women becoming students of animation, then that won't retroactively make them established parts of the industry ten or twenty years ago. Of course it's possible for a group of students to not hold a majority of the jobs, the past doesn't suddenly disappear and reboot.
it's all an elaborate scheme to #MeToo'd as much males as possible. it's self-perpetuating.
it ain't because of nepotism, no siree
source: dude trust me
White men are literally the only demographic that doesn't benefit from nepotism anymore.
Due to the way the sentence is written, a completely viable takeaway is that 70% of a single arts college student body hold 25% percent of the jobs in the entire animation industry.