Here's your cartoon community, "bro"

Exactly.

Why we can't have people like the anime/game/comics comunities have? Why everyone who reviews cartoons use his autism to evil purpouses?

>E:R being a reviewers channel in any sense

Attached: 1554770006559.png (502x499, 443K)

There aren't as many cartoons as there are anime, games and comics, so there aren't as many reviewers by extension

Look at the kind of high quality documentaries games get from youtubers

youtube.com/watch?v=_7X6Yeydgyg
youtube.com/watch?v=gt4-tBFIcsI
youtube.com/watch?v=BQLEW1c-69c

Why can't we get this sort of thing for animation? Why is everyone still aping Doug Walker?

Cartoons are considered kids stuff.

Yes, I know comics and videogames were considered kids stuff in the past, but nowadays they are considered part of the Nerd Culture, something that NEVER happened with cartoons.

Because games basically replaced the niche cartoons and toys used to fill.

Not by anyone who isn't a literal boomer

His blacklisted animator video is cherrypicked af and it really made him look like he had no clue about the industry.

>Ahoy

He has to be the greatest content producer out there. The amount of time, effort, and research that went into that video is incredible.

And his Iconic Arms videos are good. Wonder what /k/ thinks of them.

So what kind of cartoon topics would you want to see someone make a feature length documentary for anyway?

If you actually look into him he's a pretty shady dude all around. He's doxed a few people over the years and is one of those kiwi farms types (although he doesn't actually kiwi farms) who fucks with the mentally ill for fun.

>the only channel I've seen make cartoon critiques I liked was E;R aka the channel that got Pewdiepie in trouble when he recommended it to people.
Ouch.

foreign animation from Europe. Seems everyone who makes a video about animation history just reads cliffnotes about disney, nickelodeon, and cartoon network.

I think it has a lot more to do with growing room, for the fans, not creators. Video games get better coverage from people because there's more 'depth' - for lack of a better word - to gaming as a medium. There are games that are piss-simple and there are games that are very complicated. Animation doesn't really have that in the mainstream yet. Sure, adult animation 'exists' but it's predominantly comedies that only teenagers and children will find funny, and a decent animated drama won't really come out any time soon because no one will know how to market it and the same thing (or at least very similar) can be done far cheaper in live-action.

>Mr. Enter on S Tier

Attached: 1554662947999.gif (861x546, 1.99M)

Why is he Alt-Right? Also, what the fuck is Alt-Right cause the definition seems to go all over the place.

I'd argue channels like theodd1sout did it more

Bite me!

Attached: 1553574135031.jpg (480x337, 21K)

It's the non-religous far-ish right.

>Why is he Alt-Right?
Brain damage.

>There are games that are piss-simple and there are games that are very complicated. Animation doesn't really have that in the mainstream yet.

I think that view is mostly due to the fact that there isn't loads of exposure to older animation that absolutely had depth. Like, go look up film festivals abroad for animation, and almost all of them have had really wild and provocative stuff for decades. The problem is that nobody watches them, nobody gives them a good viewing guide or the context for it. Why would americans know how fucking lit russian and polish animation is if they don't get any sort of guidance on what's good and what's filler? I mean, let's look at toonami, before the internet they essentially curated anime to that viewerbase.

I think that's what western animation needs to breed this discussion, curators who've done the work of going through all this shit to point people in the right direction.

>Like, go look up film festivals abroad for animation, and almost all of them have had really wild and provocative stuff for decades.

That's kind of my point, wild and provocative isn't necessarily interesting, especially in a media landscape as desensitized as this one. Another issue, I think, is that the technology behind animation is about as good as it's going to get for big productions. People have essentially been drawing frames on paper (in various ways) for 8 decades, and when games go from 2D to VR the progression between them is a lot more interesting to watch.

The idea of curating content isn't a bad one, but I can't help but wonder if such a thing would go over well given the massive number of different directions various projects go. Like, Toonami didn't go from Naruto, to Grave of the Fireflies, and then to Bleach, they picked shows that had a more consistent tone for what they were going for. I question whether or not a similar thing for little-known western animation would be able to do such a thing.