How my boyfriend raped my dog, ate my cat fucked me with a rake and murdered my mother Episode 52

When I first started seeing her videos recommended, I thought it was like how millennials cope with shit
But as time goes on, and her entire channel is just an eternal shrine to abuse, it's creepy
There's something creepy about it

The only good female one is jaiden animation, but mostly the best ones are guys, gingerpale and odd1sout are the best honestly. But I guess tabs is acceptable, she's kind of "tough grrrrl" though.

Attached: MV5BOTA0NTg3ODgtMjZlMC00MGJiLTk3ZTEtMjdlM2ViZWFiNDFlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDQzMDg4Nzk@._V1_.jpg (701x394, 26K)

I want to make a "story time" channel in mspaint with the express purpose of taking the piss out of them in comedic style similar to filthy frank's. To make two points, 1. These folks aren't perfect little angles and world needs to see that 2. I can do this on a shoe string budget just cause I can.

Attached: Dean_Domino.jpg (739x1081, 91K)

>while profiting off it
she didn't profit of it. She was the one having a student job and providing to him.

please do this, sounds fantastic

Source of your claim ?

That's assuming her story is true, which honestly I don't. Even if I'm wrong, she's still peddling her tale on youtube for clicks and advertising of her patreon, merch, etc. ergo profit.

>it's creepy
She share her experience to prevent it from happening to other and help cope. There is nothing creepy, there.

>That's assuming her story is true
Why assume she is lying ?
>she's still peddling her tale on youtube
People using theor craft to express themselves ? Call the fucking police, who do they think they are to think they can do that ?

She made like 5 different videos on the subject.

Yes, it's almost as if she needed to express herself on the subject. Wonder why.

Anyone watch based daftpina shit all over the shit story timers?
>yfw tabbs blocked him because he was critical

Attached: picture_daftpina_medium.jpg (240x240, 10K)

>Why assume she is lying?
Why assume she's telling the truth? She's the one with the animation channel and something to sell. It is also a second hand source of the events, she could have embellished and/or straight up lied to save face. You never know, that's why we have innocent until proven guilty instead of using the court of public opinion.
>Call the fucking police, who do they think they are to think they can do that ?
A U.S. citizen who allegedly had a crime committed to them? Duh.

I did and it was BS.
His argument about thivingmake no snese. No one own the idea of "tale from my choldhood". And the marshmallow design was already a thing before oods1out. that's why odd was okay with people doing similar thing to his content.

>>yfw tabbs blocked him because he was critical
Bad critic are better blocked out.

My nigga. I miss his creative intros

>Why assume she's telling the truth?
I don't assume someone is lying until it's proven otherwise.
> It is also a second hand source of the events,
No it isn't. It's direct testimony.
>that's why we have innocent until proven guilty
You don't follow that logic. you have to assume she is telling the truth up until you can prove she is lying. Innocent until proven guilty.
>A U.S. citizen who allegedly had a crime committed to them? Duh.
You are switching the subject and ignoring the point.

thats fine in small doses buts its all she talks about. Like imagian another you tuber made a video about one level in a vidia, and it blew up so they made another... and another... and another. imagian they do this for months on end. It starts getting a little creepy right?

t. Tabbs

Plus he praised tabbs, it was her friend who is legit shit.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=cd6pdF26ifg
Tell me he's wrong here.

>I don't assume someone is lying until it's proven otherwise.
Absolutely backwards way to run a society. You clearly don't understand human nature.

>thats fine in small doses buts its all she talks about.
Yeah,it's almost as if she needed to vent out and also got a big response requesting her to tell more about it.

I don't like spechie because there is very little work in her video, but that doesn't change that his whole rant on animator misconceive a lot of points.

>Why assume she is lying ?
Presumption of innocence.

Presumption of innocence mean you assume she is telling the truth up until you can prove she is guilty of lying. You don't understand that presumption of innocence stuff, do you ?

nobody cares about you and your shitty bait, i cant believe people are actually falling for this shit

First off it's not direct testimony, these animation vids go through editing and have more preservatives in them then your mother's hair spray. Secondly, she's accusing a man of committing a serious crime, in a video designed to leech off of victims. I have no reason to trust what she's saying because of that conflict of interest alone. Lastly, I was answering your rhetorical question with a legit answer, whether or not you wish to except it is up to you. However, you're not getting the point that you should take everything, especially criminal accusations with conflicts of interests, with healthy pinch of skepticism.

>Presumption of innocence mean you assume she is telling the truth up until you can prove she is guilty of lying.
Presumption of innocence for the accused, user. You know, the whole thing the American legal system is based on? Until he's convicted I'm going to presume she's blowing it out her ass.

And she did a jayden teir animation to go with it?

It's:
youtube.com/watch?v=BX-FMvt83fA

>Presumption of innocence for the accused, user.
And you accused her.
>You know, the whole thing the American legal system is based on?
Yes, and in the legal systemm direct testimony are considered true unless proved false or unreliable. You really don't know your shit,user.
>Until he's convicted I'm going to presume she's blowing it out her ass.
That is not how the legal system work. You do not accuse someone of lying unless you have proof.

So far nothing indicate she has been lying. The user you quoted is just very insecure.

not that user but,
your points are moot in trying to turn it around

the original subject was the one to put forth a statement, in which she or whoever is in her side is responsible to provide evidence.

said user only refuted said statement, and is not required to put forth his own.

this is christian creationist levels of trying to make the atheist prove their god for them

>believe all women unless you can prove them wrong

That's how it works if you're living in the UK, I guess. But, in the U.S. we operate under the pretense that criminals are innocent until proven guilty. If that wasn't the case we would have jailed many innocent lives. If she was just some regular animation channel, I wouldn't even care; but, she made accusations against a guy for money and brushed off why she never went to the cops (which is the first thing you do if you get raped fyi). Her whole shtick smells fishy, and you're objectively wrong.

She can't afford yet to have a team of animator like Jaiden or Domic. So it's just her work on her own:
youtube.com/watch?v=Y7lYeRqhQ9Q
youtube.com/watch?v=tXlQBT_RDcY

>57
Mediocre

desu i think how people handle this issue with kid gloves is part of why its getting worse

instead of telling people to approach authorities to get some proper help, they get coddled into thinking telling friends instead. friends over the internet, even.

Of she was abused or raped or whatever i feel bad for her, but at the same time all she is doing it for is attention.. Thats all these youtubers ever do anything for is attention. There's been millions of people that have been raped or sexually abused, but they move on, they don't let it define their whole reason for being. This one just wants attention, and in this day and age with the whole #metoo movement, its hard to take anyones claims seriously. Rape has become trivilised into sensationalist media and the power behind the words rape have lost any true power. It's been turned into entertainment. People like her are taking the focus off those who actually need help and useing the word rape as nothing more than a way to get a reaction.

Agreed. I thought we all read To Kill A Mockingbird in high school, but I guess I was wrong

>your points are moot in trying to turn it around
There is no turn around. you accuse her of defamation, you have to prove it.
> in which she or whoever is in her side is responsible to provide evidence.
Testimony is legally considered an evidence. YOuhave to prove it is false to discard it.

>this is christian creationist levels of trying to make the atheist prove their god for them
IT's not, it's how the legal system work. someone say the truth unless you can discredit it.

You are making a gross confusion. Indeed, you can't out of the blue accuse someone out of the blue of something you had no direct implication of. But if you directly see someone commit a crime, it is legitimate to report that crime. you don't have to prove what you saw, you can simply report it.

Wrong, it believe all testimony unless you can discredit it.
>But, in the U.S. we operate under the pretense that criminals are innocent until proven guilty.
Hence why you can't accuse her of lying without proof.
> If that wasn't the case we would have jailed many innocent lives
Sorry, but believing she say the proof doesn't mean you believe he is guilty. I know this sound crazy, but both are considered innocent up until proven guilty.

>instead of telling people to approach authorities to get some proper help
She literally adress the issue that if she went to authorithy, she would be theone getting in trouble fro posting kid porn, because she posted pic of herself, while underage. In this case, it's the law that is badly done.

I feel like a broken record, and it's 4:05 am. Where your wrong in all of this is that she has a conflict of interest in publishing her videos. She's making money this story. The more juicy a story, the more viewers to the channel and the more $ to be made. Due to that conflict of interest, you cannot assume it to be entirely true just cause it came from her mouth.

>Where your wrong in all of this is that she has a conflict of interest in publishing her videos.
That is not what conflict of interest is.
And no, this isn't enough to discredit what she is saying.

>She's making money this story.
Yes, artist use their live experience to inspire their work, they also make money out of it. That is not enough to prove she is lying.

>calling a poorly animated you tuber a artist

Retard.

So you agree there is no conflict of interest, then ?

She's not gonna sleep with you you fat fuck.
Have sex loser

>She's not gonna sleep with you
Indeed, therefore, it means that what I am saying is my earnest opinion and I am not swayed in expressing it. I am glad we could clear that out.

She's on youtube. Thats enough to discredit anyone's opinions. Stupid zoomer.
I'm not that user. But i will tell you that she is doing it for nothing more than attention. End of story. Shes a professional victim. If she really wanted to help, she'd be volunteering her time at womens shelters. Something like that. Not constantly talking about herself. She doesn't give a shit about others experiences cause that will take the spotlight off of her.

>Thats enough to discredit anyone's opinions
Not really. Or this means you can discredit this guy too >But i will tell you that she is doing it for nothing more than attention
Accusation without proof. Aren't you a litle hypocrite, there.
> If she really wanted to help, she'd be volunteering her time at womens shelters.
She found herself in a situation where many people ended up listening to her and she is using that to give useful information. Also, you don't know what she is doing in her private life.

>She doesn't give a shit about others experiences cause that will take the spotlight off of her.
aren't you the edgy jaded kid, there.

Victim have the right to express themselves and talk about what happened to them. Nothing wrong with it. They are under no obligation to become a savior.

Making up stories doesn t help anyone quit being a white knight you fat fuck , she won't sleep with you.
Get laid incel

>Making up stories
Proof ?

oh fuck off

>streamer

god these thumbnails are cringe inducing, this is why people drawing themselves doing literally anything is seen as fucking obnoxious

That's not a thing user. Nobody shares your autism

>That's not a thing user.
Alright so-called artist.

Ginger hair, black glasses and a tearjerking back-story reminds me of Futaba.

Attached: P5_Futaba_Sakura.png (320x816, 252K)

>I don't have a counter-argument so I'm just going to tell you to fuck off
Real mature.

>tearjerking back-story

>while profiting off it
You are making this up completelly, nothing suggest this happened, her screenshots suggest that she lost money because of him and no one involved on it claimed she got money in anyway from him.

You can't take the mature road when your response was both "no one thinks this ever except for you" for immediate dismissal and also using autism as the easy go-to insult without even direct conversation prior.

You should have learned context clues as late as middle school.

Have sex

So, where's the claimed rapist in all of this?

Avatars are really grating but they're especially annoying when it's a woman's quirky insecure nervous character. I don't know which is worse though, that or the "cool badass" one like what I think it was robobuddies that uses.

With eachother?

Do it sounds awesome.

>blatantly make shit up
>uhhhh you're missing the conteeext

Angry pedophiles in this thread.

If you look at comics and YT animations created by women, it sounds like 90% of women are innocent and quirky wallflowers. It's hilarious. Not to mention that most of them try their hardest to sound like moe anime girls.

I wasn't that user but you really demonstrated the lack of having any context clues by typing out what you got from the post leaving out basically 60% of the argument.

It's embarrassing when you have fags trying to defend shit like OP girl but then they ignore a bunch of the argument to try and make it something else. Why even come here.

>I wasn't that user
Of course not, you are the Queen of England, go back to your throne you sassy old bitch.

>lack of having any context clues by typing out what you got from the post leaving out basically 60% of the argument.
Again making shit up, this "profit" thing is a striaght up lie and you clearly can't defend this claim in anyway, there is no other "context" is just that a lie.

>It's embarrassing when you have fags trying to defend shit like OP girl
Where did I say that I was defending her you fucking dipshit? I'm not, I'm just against faggots spreading bullshit everywhere making any actual discussion impossible due to retards repeating some irrelevant lie other retard said dozens of time through the thread.

Have sex incel

Hmm good point. I concede.

But I'm not a slut like you

Post her real face.

I would if he didnt pause in every other fucking sentence.

Are you seriously arguing about me being the other user as if its bizarre and impossible?