What do creators think when they see porn of their characters?

What do creators think when they see porn of their characters?

Attached: Object.png (1074x1517, 210K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nhentai.net/g/227081/1/
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleThirtyFourCreatorReactions
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>create character
>get free porn
The perfect scam, boys

One of the highest forms of flattery.

I’m sure most are flattered (and given at least one of the characters is probably their ideal Waifu, they encourage it).

>People charge $50 for a drawing
>Get tens of thousands for free because people like your character
playedem.png

it varies from person to person. Some hate it, some don't mind, and others like it.

Most don't care, I assume. Personally, as an artist who has some fanart porn of some OCs I have floating around, I don't really see the art they drew as "my character" since my style is ultimately what makes my characters immediately recognizable as "mine", so I really couldn't care less.

If there was a distinct and coordinated effort to emulate my style AND draw my character AND draw them in with extreme content (eg scat or something), I'd consider contacting them and exercising copyright, but I'm just not that popular yet.

>I'd consider contacting them and exercising copyright
you'd drop some censorship on an user just like that? disappointing desu.

Personally I'd be flattered, unless they were drawing one of my younger characters, then I'd just be begrudgingly disgusted.

Someone made porn out of my characters here and I didn't like it. But then again, it was my fault for not making female characters. I would be fine with porn out of female characters.

>censorship
I refuse to have someone profit off my intellectual property by copying both my character and my style to where it can be confused as my work. It's very unlikely to happen, though.

Scat deserves to be stamped out.

Dude, you can't stop the internet. If anything you'll make that piece of porn more popular by giving it attention. Streisand Effect is a bitch.

Try to keep the half-glass-full mentality. If your popular enough to get into all the weird fetishes like inflate/vore/etc, then you're pretty close to making it. Just look the other way and keep pursuing the holy grail of all artist: getting paid.

Porn of male characters is the highest form of flattery.

I'm not looking to stop the internet. As I said, if someone's work ever gets confused as mine, that's where I draw the line, but again, it hasn't happened yet, and I don't expect it to.

I draw a story where the main characters are kids, so I'd definitely be upset, but if someone drew porn of my grown up characters, I'd be flattered.

Also, Rebecca Sugar drew LOTS of fan porn herself. She's likely delighted. Maybe even likes the ones involving Steven, given her appreciation for Ed, Edd, and Eddy porn, who, and this seems to get glossed over, are children..

i'd think 'Hell yeah'. It means that either it's popular enough to result in smut or that the personality and/or design has resonated with someone enough to make them want to fap/schlicjk to it.

I don't know why people bring up the EEnE thing when she drew them as a teenager, and Yea Forums used to laugh at the exact same images. Feels like faux outrage.

I deeply appreciate any and all art of my characters.
Like what this user said.

Attached: 1503730212630.png (799x699, 246K)

Attached: critical-miss.png (970x1085, 1020K)

Well?
Yes or no?

I don't see the problem in her EEnE porn, it was 100% about the shipping and wanting them to be intimate together, not about showing off how sexy their underaged bodies are

>Muh inty popperty
No one gives a shit about your pretend property. R34 is a protest/rejection of copyright and "the artist's wishes" in the name of artistic freedom & sexual freedom. Liberty is more important than your selfish wishes.
>confused as my work.
Literally no one who's old enough to be on the internet would confuse official art with derivative art.

Most have made porn of their or other people characters.

Nice

really makes me wish I could draw
these people are making a killing on patreon

I want to FUCK white Korra

Attached: erin stout.png (801x552, 613K)

Eltonnel?

"Good...I've finally made it."

>in the name of artistic liberty and sexual freedom

And absence of integrity and morals.

Sauce, for anyone interested.

nhentai.net/g/227081/1/

This. They get so much less of it that ever piece has a higher fan-appreciation value.
Especially if it's draw by someone who doesn't normally do males.

How so?

Gracias user

She cute

Did they really draw this? Nice.

I draw porn of my characters all the time. Although I have gotten fan arts, I don't recall other people drawing porn of my characters though. I have been commissioned to draw porn of my character, however. Those were desperate years.

I'd probably be pretty flattered, even if its a little annoying that it might be kind of pairing I didn't like, still flattering.

>If there was a distinct and coordinated effort to emulate my style AND draw my character AND draw them in with extreme content (eg scat or something), I'd consider contacting them and exercising copyright, but I'm just not that popular yet.

You sound like Chris chan when people drew nasty fanart of his ocs.

Is the doll general still dead?

>R34 is a protest/rejection of copyright and "the artist's wishes"
A large protion, and arguably the majority, of all R34 in existence was created through commission.
>Liberty is more important than your selfish wishes
I'm going to go out on a limb and just assume you're baiting. Ownership of thought and the property rights established by state legitimacy are the reason you can go to a LCS and buy comics. It's vital to functional creative economies. I don't care about fanart. I don't care about people getting paid for fanart. I deeply care about fanart claiming to be original, especially if it is porn. It's such an exceedingly rare case that I will likely never run into it in my lifetime. I have no idea why you're going into this weird intellectual Marxism shit, though. Living in a society where ideas can be collectivised and appropriated wholesale at the exact moment of instantiation is the exact opposite of liberty.

Attached: 1553826084008.jpg (680x451, 39K)

Most of them found it outright disgusting.

I know one show creator who is grossed out/confused by people making porn of his characters since they all hate each other.

Someone once drew porn of my character and I was incredibly flattered. Someone practiced anatomy for years and learned how to use color theory and shit, and they decided to use it on my character? Fucking superb.

Attached: ahyuck die.webm (1440x1080, 253K)

I can’t believe Granite would do this to poor Stephen

It's literally rape, user. Just like Rebecca Sugar raped those Ed boys.

Attached: 1293026-crimealley.jpg (466x281, 30K)

What do anons think when they see the same op poted on multiple boards?

>Granite

Garnet's Perverted Evil twin...speaking of porn ideas...

this should be a good glimpse.

tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleThirtyFourCreatorReactions

I don't care what anyone says Nefcy has masturbated to this a thousand times and listens to a secret recording of the voice actors saying these lines.

Attached: c795711b83b78f3661843e71d67f08a7.jpg (750x942, 91K)

>A large protion, and arguably the majority, of all R34 in existence was created through commission.
Regardless, a majority of R34 is free so it's fine. Commissions are just a glorified donation of someones time. (If it's pay-walled, I'd be against it). Comissions, donations, and ad revenue is more like maintenance mode for an artist's livelihood; to pay the bills and can make more art.

I never said you couldn't or can't make money off of your creation, and am not in favor of bootlegging (selling a copy of someone's shit). I think we're on the same page on this.

No one claims fan art/derivative art as original. They claim it's fair use. They're using existing characters but not re-producing an exact copy of something. However, copyright and power tripping artists who overvalue their creations can use copyright as a weapon for censorship, and have art dmca'd. which is equivalent to digital book burning, or digital vandalism.

I disagree with the copyright monopoly and its draconian laws criminalizing good people and censoring the internet over pretend property. I'm not against the license ideology, it has its uses but most of it is disagreeable to me. Maybe I've got some marxist views, maybe not, I don't know but artistic freedom and sexual freedom is important, and something I deeply care about. Porn is good for exploring ones self and achieving inner peace. If they want to do so through fictional characters they like, I'm all for it.

>Liberty:The condition of being free from restriction or control.
artistic freedom.
>The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.
sexual freedom. Both sound like liberty, being hindered by the copyright monopoly.

Well seeing as what you posted is drawn kiddy porn i'd say disgusted usually. but given who the creators are, they probably masturbated to it.

cry me a river you unimaginative prude.

one of the few good tvtropes pages

I have omega level autism when it comes to my characters. I would hate to see lewds and porn of them due to how I see them representing certain aspects of my life, but I have no problem of posting porn of myself on the internet.

Attached: 1498307132478.gif (440x247, 621K)

You can recognize complete trash with a glance.
The only people who'll give it the big thumbs up are horny easily swayed retards who have no taste and will fap/shlick to crudely drawn stick figures

>create character
>get free art from people who like the designs

Feels good when that happens. Never gotten any free porn, though.

The final good thing they ever made.

a drop in the sea of shitty r34, but damn that's a tasty drop

Source?

Yeah, this shit is funny.

>no cucking
Nefcy probably hates it

>Daron, I don't feel comfortable saying this lines.
>Neither do I. It seems a little ooc for Marco.
>You will do as I say and that's final!

lol xD

I miss the perks...

Source?

latelly those have very short life

Based

quads

I love it when doujins end on a funny note.

Attached: 8.png (1074x1517, 143K)

>A large protion, and arguably the majority, of all R34 in existence was created through commission.
This is a retarded thing to believe.

Okay I get it, but you realize your reaction there would make you look like a hard R to anyone viewing you right?

Any cartoon creator under 50 easily understands that if their creation exists, pornography will exist of it.

I believe porn is a good measurement to see how much people like your characters and show so to me its flattery.

And arguably if people didn't make porn of my characters I would make it myself.

Attached: fucksu.png (1033x480, 125K)

>I'd consider contacting them and exercising copyright, but I'm just not that popular yet.
lmao who the fuck do you think you are? nintendo?
get off your high horse

For /sug/ Yea Forums.
Damn, nice /sug/.

Creator myself, it's kind of a mixed bag.

It's really bothering if character gets shoehorned a fetish you don't like and it gets repeated endlessly due to popular demand.

But most importantly I enjoy anything crafted from genuine care or love for the thing's I've created. No matter if it's porn or not, while it's made with good intent.

Attached: 1550782059060.jpg (1242x980, 163K)

Any creator around Rebecca's age (older half of millennials) or older would understand since they grew up with a more wild and untamed internet before everything was tweeted, but I'm not too sure about the younger half of millennials and there will definitely be push back/virtue signalling from zoomer creators. Leaves me concerned in all honesty.

ANY creator from any age knows your work can get pornified, hell they found furry transformation art in one of the locked cases of the guy who wrote and drew Astro Boy

where exactly do i starting diving into critical role
the first campaign or the second ?

>I think we're on the same page to that extent
For the most part, but
>commissions are just a glorified donation
This is so wrong. I am blocking time away to provide what is effectively a manufacturing of goods specified for a client. Donation implies that the work receiving donations is unbound by client expectation or specification. That is never the case. I don't get commissions by having someone pay me, and then fucking off to ignore their request and draw what I want. I'm dependent on the satisfaction of my client, and that requires understanding what they want. But anyway.

>No one claims fan art/derivative art as original
Don't be so naive. As already stated, the situation arising is low probability, but "almost never" and "never" are NOT the same thing.

As for your jump into metaphysics, I can't really contend to any of that. All I can say that there isn't really a "copyright monopoly" in a way you understand it, and I can't logically respond to your arguments of porn enabling inner peace, although I'll say I disagree with that statement in totality. Simple as.

>arguably
I said "arguably" for a reason. There is a decent chunk, but I don't know if it is the majority because I don't claim to know shit I don't know. Calm yourself.

How many times do I have to say that I'm fine with fanart, but draw the line at art theft and source misrepresentation? There is no high horse. It's a legitimate concern. It's unlikely, but plausable.

>the guy who is so mad his characters are in scat porn that he sues some scabby deviant in his mom's basement
Yeah, there would be no way this wouldn't lead to everyone pouncing and making as much exaggerated scat of your characters as possible. That's how the internet works and when people would google any character of yours it'd be worse than straight up googling "tubgirl".

>draw the line at art theft and source misrepresentation?

It's kinda inevitable that will happen, and you just gotta laugh about it.

pic related.

Attached: 1453043574015.png (496x542, 340K)

>Going through the effort to piss him off

Also, scat is something that doesn't spread, it's a curse, artists who draw it get tainted reputation for creating a single image of it.

Attached: 1552200237047.png (568x510, 227K)

The threads don't last very long, it's an achievement just to get to bump limit, or last a week.

Attached: ;_;.png (764x347, 148K)

Source please. I tried looking and I can't find anything good on Garner.

I can agree with this. As mentioned, the hypothetical perfect storm that would have to occur for me to exercise copyright would be rare. Very, very rare.

I'm not going to repeat myself for a 3rd time. You've fundamentally missed my point.

that man is a fucking legend. too bad the midna comic will never be finished

>How many times do I have to say that I'm fine with fanart, but draw the line at art theft and source misrepresentation? There is no high horse. It's a legitimate concern. It's unlikely, but plausable.
Listen guys, when I said that I would exterminate Polacks if given an opportunity, I DIDN'T mean I would do it to all of them. My wording was very specific in implication that I was referring only to a fringe case of a Polack who was convicted of murdering my family.
It is a genuine concern that I, a Korean who have previously heard of Poland, need to take into consideration.

>Calm yourself
Says the guy sperging out over porn with multiple paragraphs on multiple posts. Get help.

It's not my fault that reading comprehension isn't your strength.

Weill, fuck. It was good while it lasted.

>nhenati
Look at this fag who can’t access panda.

>Am I so out of touch? No. It's every other poster in the thread who is wrong.
No need to make scat of your work, it's already guaranteed to be shit.

I was surprised since it doesn't even have genitals.

Attached: gangplank.jpg (708x406, 65K)

Bait. How was I inconsistent?

Personally I wouldn't really care, people are free to do what they want. Just don't show or send that shit to me though, I know what degeneracy the internet is capable of.
People should have the creativity freedom to do what they want, in return I have the freedom to mock and ridicule them.

Nhentai has a million times better interface, especially on mobile. Panda needs to update their shit

This. Having exhentai access is pointless if I have to constantly zoom and pan scroll around a page twice as big as my phone screen.

>inb4 phone poster
Nope. Just a phonefapper

my dream is going to rule34 and seeing my characters with their own tag

I didn't word myself well with "glorified donation". Your response is correct.
I meant it as "on the same level as a donation" in that I wouldn't consider it profit. One person enabling an artist to make something for everyone is the kind of profit artists should be allowed for their lively-hood.

>Don't be so naive.
Fair but you're also being hyperbolic. The closest I've seen to people claiming ownership of another person's characters is kids re-coloring a character on deviant art or some shit.
Anyone claiming ownership of other artist's characters would face public scrutiny, and cease shortly after.

>I disagree with that statement in totality.
Do you think people can come out of their shell through porn? Can it prevent suicide?
It's okay if you don't like porn, but it is good and helps people. Copyright is no excuse to take that enjoyment away from others.

I don't think there's anything particular about it vs any other fanart. As an artist your goal is always to express yourself but also to incite an emotion in your audience, you want to surprise, amuse, excite and terrify them. Art is a means of communication and the most objective way to measure it's success is how effectively it communicates an idea and an emotion to the viewer.

Sexuality IS a part of the human experience, and of the more complex ones at that. It's far from just a lowly instinct if you dig deeper than just waving T&A at people, find it really interesting to learn what really triggers people to become infatuated and obsessed with characters, i think every creator should embrace that fact that they're making content for human beings and the sexuality of their viewers will color the way they receive their creations.

Attached: 1549668995520.jpg (1080x1350, 100K)

Peak R34 kino coming through

Drawing is almost universally a terrible time per dollar conversion

Maybe, but not with patreon though since it's a subscription service. the commissions are an added bonus

>claiming ownership
As in "these are my original characters".

Tezuka truly was ahead of his time

Based on what?

Dude, if I was an artist and someone made fanart or porn of my OCs with grotesque shit like guro or scat, I would still be flattered that someone took their time to draw it, grow a thicker skin you pussy

I think it's kind of hype that Japanese artists saw Garnet as the Older Sister type, rather than what we usually get where artist lean towards Cougar, or even MILF type.

>My ill-proned belly.

I think that's from the translator.

Based Carlton Banks translations

I'm done responding to people. Already made my stance clear in the other replies.

That doesn't make it any better at all.

Heard the author is doing (or did, I have no idea) a sequel

user's probably a furry artist. They take porn of their characters too personally, and get really pissed when their art-style is emulated.

Art-style isn't copyrightable. I'd love so see certain art styles in porn.

You really only needed to say, "I adore that you're so threatened by this"
Heck, it'd probably shut down most of the other responses too

I understand it, and I know I can't fight it. I just wish I could direct it into being more in character sometimes.

WRONG. Drawing is one of the biggest scams out there. 3 Hours of work for 50$ at the very very very least.

this shit was actually kino. there should be a story time on here. it wouldn't be fun on /aco/ so the nudity should be blurred out. also, it's something interesting for the newfag

If you don't want to run away from a conversation, sure.

If you want to run away*

>contacting them and exercising copyright
Do you really think people that draw that stuff put out their contact information? You wouldn't be able to do shit

Sure? Continue, man, I wanna laugh at you

Probably. In hindsight, would have saved me some time, but whatever. It's obvious that no one wants to read my responses where I clarified the exact case when I'd pursue something like that. Screaming into the void to be honest.

These weren't me btw

if you're skilled, sure.

I don't know, but if I were a creator and someone made porn of my characters, I would go full JK Rowling and get autistic 'that's not how they would have sex! X-boy is a complete sub for all his tough guy attitude! Y-girl is flexible to her partner's tastes' etc.

There was that post floating around about Angus Oblong discovering herny's Suzie pics and being flattered by them.

>he doesn't have ehviewer

Attached: Screenshot_20190402-181537.png (1440x2560, 1.19M)

Sauce

it's already been given man, take even the slightest bit of initiative

Shota fucking sucks and ruins what would otherwise be great doujins

It takes a strong voice to pull off. When Bayonetta first came out artists were drawing her being all soft and submissive but then Hideki Kamiya went online and was like "hey guys all this art is great but you're getting her personality wrong, she's dominant in the bedroom".
And it worked, sub Bayo art went way down, and Dom Bayo art went way up.

Attached: kamiya.jpg (1600x1066, 290K)

For fuck's sake.

Wrong. So very wrong.

>He doesn't self insert as a cute shota

Attached: 1310080086145.png (353x300, 8K)

>they draw porn
>you have to pay for the porn
>they don’t get any copyright strikes because of it

I hate artist at times...gives us free porn!

Fucking Kamiya doesn't understand that tough, proud, confident girls make the best subs.

And you don't understand Bayonetta.

To use SU as an example, they've probably drawn and talked about lewder stuff in the privacy of the CN offices than anything we could come up with. Cartoonists aren't exactly prudes.

why is japan obsessed with incest???

Absolutely. Reminds me of pic related.

Attached: storyboard rugrats.png (1106x735, 385K)

Sure if you're famous.
But if you're famous you don't need to work either, so drawing would probably be a waste of your time.

Flattery and Faggotry

>Fred Flinstone's home!

every time

Attached: endless laugh.jpg (820x1206, 582K)

Pro tip: if you're worried about people doing shit with your doughnut steels that you don't like, an easy way to avoid it in the first place is not to show people your doughnut steels. If you do, make sure it's either somebody who doesn't care, does care to the point of not doing what you wouldn't like with your doughnut steels, or who is doing something professionally or semiprofessionally and so who will respect your desires with your doughnut steel.

This is not a very difficult proposition unless you actually want to show people your doughnut steel(s). This is also not a problem depending on your priorities. If you really don't care, whatever happens happens. If you do care, one of the best winning moves is not to play.

Attached: 1550583734573.png (1267x785, 97K)

ehviewer on a kindle is perfection.

Attached: okqxp3zo92vz.jpg (467x433, 40K)

I appreciate all you guys contributions.

Attached: Evil_Crumbs.jpg (1920x1080, 200K)

To be honest, it's like a milestone.you know your work got enough attention from your potential followers when they're invested to the point of start making yank-off material about them.

I've been writing characters that are bottom heavy for this reason. I hope my work takes off.

hi ian

I am extremely turned off whenever I hear or imagine Garnet's voice and accent, I don't know why

why western cartoon/comic porn so trashy

its fucking garbage

You just know that Rebecca schlicked to this at least once.

I hate all porn of steven unless he has a ginormous magic hypercock and massive balls.

But ... There wasn't any ....

This.

Eh, they're so-so. Sometimes they last through Saturday, other times they die within the day. It really depends on who's aware they're up.

I sometimes draw shit in there but they're never really active anymore

Name some examples, because I can list some artists who openly draw scat and are fine because they're not autists about it like AnimatedJames

>You will never get a blowjob from two (2) shortstack lesbians at the same time
fuck

Estelle isn't a good actor

What do creators think when they see someone fictionkin their characters?

Attached: 118112111964672000.jpg (512x384, 29K)

I dunno about them, but I'd be low key proud and flattered

SAUCER!?

>look up fictionkin
I'm not phased one bit at this point, can't be worse than otherkin

fire the storyboard artist responsible

This. That one madman that made one to one porn of LoZ BotW made it clear as fuck why Nintendo shut them down real fast over other fan work stuff. That's why on model porn is retarded. Only do that for literal hentai like Asagi or some shit.

/tg/ here. please, just don't. for the sake of all involved.

Attached: 1552387235143.png (916x1162, 1.91M)

It worked out for Zone, matching the original artstyles is arguably what made him so famous.

But that's long before the Internet was socialized garbage. And besides his stuff was still clearly not from the source material because of the Flash animation. It everything he did was also frame by frame hand drawn and on model to the source? Things might be different, but still he might get by because of the early Internet instead of today.

The romance of being the sole person who gets to see the softer, gentler, vulnerable side of an intimidating woman is lost on you and Kamiya. I weep for you both.

>t tough, proud, confident girls make the best subs.

Not worth the effort.
And breaking bitches into good little subs or cracking a tough cunts thighs of steel to get to the soft inner depths has the whole #metoo and "you're a rapist for even considering it" thing going for it.

So "tough bitches" are just women who aren't worth the effort by men who have something to lose. Thus they are pushed away and ignored and treated like toxic waste.
But loser men who have no standards and nothing don't give a shit and will try with any woman.
But their opinions don't mean anything.

You don't get it either. Lord, I beg for eloquence so I can make these fools understand.

Explain.
I'll put off bed time for a half hour.

there's millions of doujin that feature normal relationships. Incest ones just stand out more.

>A large protion, and arguably the majority, of all R34 in existence was created through commission
Found the underage too fucking retarded to understand that the Versailles of pornography the internet is now doesn't totally reflect on the past 20+ years of R34. And that's just one reason why that statement is stupid.

>and be on model next time or i'll kick your ass
i have such a soft spot for metahumor.

Imagine there is a person. Thousands of people see her face, and it's a scary, intimidating, unassailable face, belonging more to a stern stone statue than any flesh and blood woman. And that is the face that everyone else in the world sees. You alone have the privilege of knowing what it looks like when weeps, or screams in frustration, shivers with anticipation, or smiles with relief. She doesn't trust those feelings, those vulnerabilities with anyone that isn't you. To everyone else, she is hard and harsh, but you are lucky to know better than that. To know her better than anyone.

no no, i understand your words. i comprehend your opinion.

but one of my grandfather's sayings was "don't marry a woman that can't take you two out of three rounds" and I'll admit, i'm pretty sure there's something genetic he passed down that makes us very preferential to that kind of woman. I don't think that saying started with him.

Now, that's not to say she can't be kindly and sweet. My mother is an absolute angel. But angels are known for righteous wrath just as much as mercy. She's as goodhearted and gentle as they come, but at her core she is tougher than a boiled owl, and though I've rarely seen it, I am always very glad I am on this end of the mama bear.

So to me (and by extension I'm guessing most of my paternal lineage), finding out that underneath her hard, proud, confident shell a woman is an insecure vulnerable doormat just looking to drop the act and swoon into dependency in the arms of her big strong man, just... its almost kinda disgusting. It's like getting catfished.
Like, I get it, it makes you feel like a bigger man or whatever, but that is just not at all for me.

Yeah, I know all of that.
But there's a problem.
No man knows that aspect of her, no man can ever see that face.
Why?
Because getting to see that face and aspect of her is both too much trouble and something that they don't know exists and thus won't ever try to see. Hell they probably won't even like what's there under her exterior.

You're presuming way too much. The novelty of her being "herself" or whatever that is around me doesn't mean that who she really is will be worth the effort or even likable.

Sorry user.
But your fantasy of being the special one is indicative of selfishness and wanting to be defined and enslaved by someone who you don't even really know.

She isn't the slave in that scenario.
You are.

Nice LARP.
Now go play pretend and gaslight retards into looking for/pretending to be tuff wimminz on reddit you fucking creeper loser.

struck a nerve, did I?

How the fuck do you do that to begin with? You're a hairy ass grown man.

the power of art and imagination.

you can be whatever you want to be.

That's our user!

Attached: 65951742.jpg (471x460, 57K)

Attached: Critical Miss 1534590672078.jpg (500x500, 370K)

Yeah.
I'm tired of LARPers like you creating entirely bullshit scenarios to push your fetish and ideals onto stupid cunts who're reading your bullshit.

Do you people get paid to do this?

Which leads to lunacy.

What are you even on about?

is this some stupid "it doesn't agree with me so it must be a shill" /pol/ thing or something?

I remember Eltonnel mention seeing them pop into one of their streams before. Guess they had to say something after the cat was out if the bag (not that I know the timeline of events here).

my friend randomly drew an OC that me and my buddy used in an animation (i was stuck looking at that character/drawing it for a year) and I wasn't prepared for it to be porn. Couldn't really describe the initial feeling, it was weird, but then i just laughed. After popping that cherry i don't give a shit I'd just be happy if people cared enough about our stuff to make fanart.

user.
You were telling a story about how your grandfather says you shouldn't date a girl who can't take you two rounds out of three then you tarded on about a bunch of other dumb shit.

You're talking as if what you said was an opinion and not an objective fact that you understood based on real life experience and lived by it.

Meaning.
You are a liar

Yeah if anyone tries to make me look at their porn of my characters I'm going to fucking dox them

>most of the porn is of fetishes you hate

Attached: 1460870643505.jpg (184x184, 5K)

Why do you assume it is about domination as a form of control rather than of intimacy and trust?

>Sexual desire lacks moral integrity

Guess it's time for us to go extinct!

I just hope when it happens they accept me as their god.

I never said anything about domination and control.
I said that you would be the submissive in that relationship.

If you want to talk domination and control then you are quite honestly stating that you want her to be dominant till no one is watching and you become submissive to her desires.

There is no domination on your part. At all.
You don't understand the power dynamics between men and women and are projecting, well failing to prorject your own desires for a relationship into something that is fundamentally the exact opposite of what you say it is.

It doesn't work.
Just be open about your desires and wants and stop pretending that it's something else becuase some creepy fucks online make you feel bad about it.
Be earnest with your needs or someone will manipulate you into wanting something that has nothign to do with who you really are or really want.

Sexual desire that helps society grow is moral.
Sexual desire that is destructive and is created to purposely destroy and control society and empower certain people is fundamentally evil.

I don't care about the porn.

It's the shipping I would be afraid of with my characters.

Why do people jerk this off so much? Because it's pretty accurate to the style of the show? I mean, it's good, but I've glossed over it a few times and it doesn't seem like anything that special otherwise, and the slow burn was pretty damn slow at that.

i said it was one of his sayings. I never heard it from the horse's mouth, only quoted by dad, because by the time I was forming memories, grampa bill had pretty much lost all his to the alzheimers. He had a lot of sayings, really. I'd have loved to actually met the guy rather than his slightly ambulatory living corpse. There's a lot of family history I don't know because of that.

and, yeah, what I'm saying is an opinion? Preferences are by definition subjective?
What do you want me to say, "women with a backbone are objectively superior and all other beliefs are lies or misguided"? People can have different tastes. People that don't have a specific taste can still understand the reasoning behind it.

uh huh...

S U B T E X T

I wouldn't care but might be peeved if they drastically change up the body type or personality because it implies they don't really like the character beyond window dressing elements.

I'm not gonna act all grateful because someone made porn fanart or leave comments or things like that, not gonna give it public likes or retweets.

I shouldn't bite this hook, but I don't don't understand your beef with this guy.

or here either.

Are you saying there are freaks trying to trick people into having certain fetishes?

Of course you don't.

And yes.
There are people who are trying to trick people into having certain fetishes and even go gay/bi/transexual for cash, to lower birthrates, to hurt the moral of a society, and to have a larger dating/sex pool.

Welcome to the terrible fucking truth of the net. It's not a fucking pill
Or a truth bomb.
It's a horrible fact of reality and one your stupid naive ass should have realized when you turned 14 years old or spent more then a fucking year on the net.

Oh my God its you again, you get offended when anyone likes anything you don't like shut the fuck up and take your meds

Who? (I kinda wanna know who the artist is...reverse search yields nothing good.)

Disney ones may not be surprised
Others, though...

I will never understand why freak out over one person thinking your character is attractive, but I love this comic.

Critical Miss.

I'd take the Hideki Kamiya approach honestly. I'd take it as a sign of success, but lay some ground rules for characters.

Because they all commit incest. Ever wonder why they look the same? That's why

I don't know what they think but I'd like Sugar and the other modern creators who've made shows these past years that for all the thought and effort you're putting in your works, they're turning out to be sensationless. The only good thing to come out of them is the fan artists' spin on your dull product, which is most often porn and in a better style. You may think they are inspired by your work but they're not. They're salvaging it.

Attached: 1535917113668-845647598.png (640x360, 287K)

>50$ at the very very very least.
More like 30.

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. But only the mediocre artists draw something in the same style as the show. The good ones attempt their own style.

Sometimes I fap to my own characters but I never draw porn because I could be doing something more productive with my hands. More than likely if someone drew my characters sexually I'd be both flattered and extremely turned on. I hope I have that level of influence someday.

Sugar drew porn of series she likes before SU, she knows it happens

Are you been deliberately vague because otherwise you couldnt hide the fact that you are one of those inbred /pol/tards? Guys I think he is been deliberately vague because otherwise he couldnt hide the fact that he is one of those inbred /pol/tards.

>extreme content
>scat

>integrity
>morals
you are a disgusting creature

Attached: 5213416897_5ed82a350f_z.jpg (553x357, 84K)

That makes it super worse you creeper, Jesus Christ!

She was obviously self inserting as DD

At least you tried.

Attached: dab.gif (462x341, 3.24M)

>who, and this seems to get glossed over, are children..
They're blobs with faces, the designs aren't really discernible as children.

or, OR a random guy could be into a certain personality type.

Which seems more likely? Boogeyman, or that?

Please exercise your copyright so you can waste money and time into court. This fucking autist femoid

I'm a guy ya dip.

seething commies and porn-addled degnerates BTFO

Attached: 1552636829527.jpg (396x554, 132K)

Danke

I like it when it's good, if you gonna make porn of my characters and twitter me looking for approbation of your inflation bondage scat loli porn made using MSpaint I will just fucking ignore you and pray to God you go away. holy fuck!

Attached: 1539293197975.jpg (800x450, 48K)

“Heh... nice.”
It’s expected. Of course, the next generation likes putting a damper on it so we’ll see how well rule 34 holds up.
I wouldn’t want to see it, but knowing it’s there means it now “exists” in the internet’s eyes.

Sauce?

lol bullshit. a fucking 5 minute sketch is 15$

You can't copyright parody. Pornography in all forms is considered parody.