Out of twelve episodes so far, three of them have been about crushes and romance. That's 25% of the episodes...

Truly a fate worst then death.

>Disney are well aware of the real reason Zootopia made a billion dollars

it was about racism?

furries

Autistic aryans

12 episodes in and she already has a ship?

she had one since episode 2, a dirty street fox that lives under a bridge

Attached: 1545.png (640x360, 161K)

Hack writers who are often still teenagers in the mind.

Anyone else that's knotting her?

Spoken like a true blue autist

Attached: 1553103977544.png (648x492, 202K)

>not pure-bred wolves
>in-bred and subservient to humans
>aryans
That's not how you race meme, sir.

What is Steele from Balto doing there? He's not a Disney character.

And I hate romance shit in cartoons aimed at little kids. What's the fucking point of cartoons doing this shit when we all know they don't have the balls and cannot actually do proper relationships. In the case of animals they hook up to FUCK and REPRODUCE. No way a children's show is going to show this the vast majority of the time and for human characters? No dice. So why include this shitty element? It's as bad as The Simpsons doing "almost-swearing" moments like saying "Son of a--" and they get interrupted. Shitty shit shit. Western Animation is shit.

Okay.

>romance shit in cartoons aimed at little kids
Because the writers are adults, and normally write to entertain themselves. Like that Catillac Cats episode about cheating. Nothing for kids there.

The looks less like a ship and more like imminent rape

I like her voice. Real trashy.

That sounds sad. A bunch of adults making episode stories based on themes that by default they cannot maximize because it's a show for children. It sounds like the people working on cartoons are failures on some level.

Even so they shouldn't go around putting shit that they know they cannot do properly. Another thing they never should do is pretend they can have action scenes with actual violence and punching connecting to the face and the like. Western Animation is junk.

>Why do modern cartoons focus so much on relationships?
Because most showrunners don't comprehend that kids don't give a flying fuck about their shitty relationship webcomic and relationship problems aren't actually nearly as relatable as they think they are.

It's not the writers who are failures, it's the animation industry. The whole "cartoons must be marketed at kids" is entirely the fault of the industry, and that is why you need to have cartoons like Sausage Party to shock the system, cause otherwise it will never change.

>twelve episodes
Mega?

It's worse than that. They focus about this relationship garbage with ugly looking characters (usually the female character is uglier than the male as well). Humans are visual animals, you want them to tolerate something even something bad? Pick a good art style like how Korra did.

They pick a subject that boys generally don't give a fuck about and use ugly art styles? No way do boys give a shit (girls do because they always liked romance trash). The only time I remember boys tolerating girly crap is stuff like Sailor Moon because the girls look physically attractive.

Nobody likes Korra dude, the only time people bring it up is the thing they sneaked into the last 5 seconds of the series.

>The whole "cartoons must be marketed at kids" is entirely the fault of the industry

I blame Hannah-Barbera and Disney combined for this garbage image that animation has. I find it hilarious that Tezuka a Japanese man was inspired by Disney however he never adopted the bullshit mentality of Animation Must Be For Kids which is why his stories had guns, killing, bloody violence at times, etc.

While you are correct, Japan does not censor MOST things, so their kids get this kind of content. A lot of "somewhat mature" works are viewed by teenagers and 10 agers.

>we want the loud house audience

Because it's easy.
Do you really think anyone working on this is putting any effort into it?

>we want the furry audience
fixed for your own protection.

Except Loud House is popular specifically because it doesn't do this. This is copying the Star Vs/SU/Adventure Time model that killed the shows.

>Adventure time
>Romance
Wasn't he fucking the dog?

Attached: 1548894649576.jpg (520x544, 67K)

What about her brother? Is there any girl into him so I can self-insert into her?

he's into poodles, has a rottweiler "girlfriend", a mare has a crush on him, that same husky from the OP also wants to self-insert himself into him (if you know what I mean) and got tricked into marriage by a corgi, but we all know he and his step sister Dolly will be together in the end.

Then explain "Helga" from Hey Arnold

Attached: original.gif (500x391, 1.24M)

Attached: rf question mark.png (300x300, 118K)

The pups here are pretty much all adopted, barring the two oldest, with Dylan being from his mom's side, and Dlly coming from the dad.

>Sausage Party to shock the system, cause otherwise it will never change.

DUDE FOOD ORGYY!!

A single consistent romantic interest isn't the same as a revolving door of relationships and new characters trying to appeal to shippers.

Arnold had what? 2 love interests in 8 years + a movie?

Relationships didn't ruin Adventure Time, low budget, Diversity, Muto and Xayaphone did it.

>Why do modern cartoons focus so much on relationships?
Because you retarded fucks continuously lap it up. Just look at what type of things Yea Forums talks about when it comes to only cartoons, it's always about shipping wars and who's gonna get together with who (unless it's SU then it's about Yea Forums wanting to jerk it to rocks), the cartoon side of Yea Forums has become nothing more than a bunch of giddy seamstresses that gossip all night long.

>Because you retarded fucks continuously lap it up.
The shows that do this have low ratings though. Yea Forums and twitter are not good representations of what's actually popular.

what a slut

>Steven Universe and OK KO have low ratings
Yeah that's why they give them prime timeslots and continue production on them after years right? Oh wait you're just blowing shit out of your asshole because you don't like thing.

Look at the ratings yourself dingus

The TV ratings are plummeting. It's dead but old dinosaurs keep propping it up.

>Wah Wah I don't like romance because I'm an unkissable incel that means my children's cartoons shouldn't have romance in them but I still jerk it to the underaged characters
You know these types of things aren't meant to cater specifically to dangerous individuals like yourself right? This is like getting mad at seeing Christmas stuff at a grocery store as a Muslim.

The kids the shows are meant for are the ones who don't like romance heavy shows user. Calm your autism.

>Nothing for kids there.
Except teach kids life lessons and social concepts that they can use later on in life.

>I said nobody likes it that must mean it's completely true for the entire world, much less for this board
Do you live in a vacuum? Because you fucking suck.

He's just a Rule34 fan, furry porn faggot it's not the deep stop scaring yourself.

Attached: 1553776209299.jpg (400x350, 43K)

Bazinga

Do TV Nielsen ratings even matter if the producers can nowadays more accurately measure how popular a show really is through downloads, length of time watched and views from whatever apps there are?
After all, Netfix's big advantage is that they know exactly how popular a show is among the viewers, despite whatever critics say about it. That kind of data gathering is surely being replicated by other channels and content providers as well.

The shows are for families, not kids. Shows aimed squarely at kids and only kids died back in the late 80s when mighty mouse started referencing Ayn Rand. Craig McCracken said in an interview once that the CN execs told them to write for 20 year old dudes, not children.

They need to be appropriate for kids, of course, but you're a fucking moron if you think that the only demographic being aimed for is kids

No the loud house audience would be if the show catered to a bunch of incestuous pedophiles, like real actual pedophiles if you ever so much as glance at that fanbase. This is clearly catering to animal fuckers that want to abuse their dog for self-pleasure.

You know girls are into romance (And I don't Mean Fucking) earlier then boys have you learn nothing.
Most modern shows are play to female viewers.

Attached: 8628798.jpg (250x187, 23K)

If by female you mean autistic twitter whiners who fucked Alex Hirsch then yeah I guess.

Much like lolicons, most furries don't want to fuck actual dogs

They've been doing it since the 30s. Moms are the ones who buy the toys, not dads

>They need to be appropriate for kids, of course, but you're a fucking moron if you think that the only demographic being aimed for is kids
That ended in the late 80's and most so call kids shows treated kids like retards or sell them toys I was a 80's baby, that's why most people love the 90's cartoons

This but unironically.

People on Yea Forums in general but especially on media boards like Yea Forums use the site so much that they forget that normal people don't think or act like us.

Attached: 1551199119111.png (540x304, 103K)

1996 came before twitter.

A single romantic connection that persisted throughout the whole series that used both as part of Helga's characterization as well as a plot point for several episodes, many of which didn't spin it as a completely positive thing, but was never the majority focus for the series as a whole nor was it treated as a mere stint to embellish shipping wars like most shows do nowadays not just cartoons.

>Girls - romance, true Love, the one

>Boys - Spinless Sex Fucking there brains out=true love or love?

>The kids the shows are meant for are the ones who don't like romance heavy shows
How can you be so sure they don't like heavy romance shows when they're the ones that keep watching it as much as the bloated manchildren on this board do? Oh wait that's right, you don't. You just think that by saying it that it'll be true enough.

Yes there panning to the fandom shipping wars, but people these days act like a kids can't have crush's and it's only when you wake up one morning at 40.

Attached: 1553700462087.jpg (449x349, 59K)

>Why do modern cartoons focus so much on relationships
I'm curious about this myself too. It's extremely boring so I don't see why showrunners/creators feel the need to shove in stuff like that.

This show sucks, but I want to fuck the dog

What about her rottie friend Roxy? btw, anybody got a mega?

Because it appeals to teenagers. See ; "kids" cartoons are for families, not just kids

That's not a pit bull

Attached: 1553744221349.png (1260x1500, 1.31M)

>Except teach kids life lessons and social concepts that they can use later on in life.

Such as what? Be a Nice Beta Male and you'll find a pretty girl that will love you for who you are? Bullshit. Or how about this lie? Women aren't shallow and don't like handsome bad boys. Have another, women aren't sluts. It's all lies. Pure garbage and lies.

So there's nothing of any value there for boys.

I've only seen two episodes. Is Roxy another hot dog?

enjoy your vacations

>Getting mad over your own inadequacies
Jesus no wonder you're on Yea Forums...

That's because America is a Single Mother Shit Country. That's what you get for being retards who gave women rights. The human species is too Pro-Pussy (Gynocentric).

This species would flourish if we castrated the Pro-Pussy men. Got to castrate them into obedience as they're the enablers of women's bullshit rights that they never deserved.

Based, dogpilled and worth it

which one?

Attached: 1553903807412.png (1057x595, 607K)

Fuck you, your mother should have aborted you. Kill yourself already or die in a fire already you piece of societal excrement.

Did you even read my post? Single mothers weren't even really a thing back in the 30s

good post dawg

Exactly. Anything less than R rated will wake the sheeple.

>Then explain "Helga" from Hey Arnold

Well she's a cunt who mostly spent years of her life being a cunt to someone she claims to love yet she's worried he's not going to like her back but of course he has every reason to reject you you ugly cunt. You barely show your decent side to him. And ultimately she only got a happy ending because it's politically incorrect for a twat to get rejected by a male character. It's such a forbidden concept no matter where you are. Especially as a cartoon aimed at children that some women do NOT deserve to be loved because she behaved like a cunt.

They are now and until the USA collapses it will continue to be a thing. Never give rights to twats and any man who insists that women should have rights must be castrated.

You are among the most autistic people I've ever met

Kill yourself.

...

*not
Damn it, my itchy trigger finger.

You still here? Go be based and redpilled somewhere else.

He should forgo his species and fuck a cat.

Do you think fujoshi animals who ship cross-species exist in the Dalmatianverse? Asking for a friend haha

BREED
CONSUME
SPEND

Do girls even know what handsome is.
I know why beta males are pushed because they come off as less predatory.

>children, who are physically unable to experience romantic feelings
I don't know where this idea comes from. My first crush was when I was 8, and around the same time I was pairing off my Bionicles and even had them have kids. Even if a child hasn't experienced romantic feelings firsthand, I think many are probably capable of understanding what romantic feelings, even if only from their portrayal in the media they consume. Kids are smart. (And if by romantic feelings you mean sexual, I was having sexual thoughts long before I knew what sex was.)

I would also question the notion that cartoons used to not have romance in them. Perhaps you mean they did not take romance seriously or give it center stage, or use it for "drama." That I would agree with, but certainly there have always been cartoon characters fawning over each other, or casual depictions of boy/girlfriend relationships. There's even the cartoon-specific "eyes-bulging-out-of-sockets/tongue-lolling-out-of-mouth/heart-pounding-out-of-chest" gag when a female character shows up that's supposed to be sexy.

>Perhaps you mean they did not take romance seriously or give it center stage, or use it for "drama."
(And even as far as that goes, I'm sure you could find many exceptions.)

Cartoons appeal to children and childlike people. The most childlike people are normally women. Women like romance. If you want your cartoon to get huge, pander to women and their obsession with relationships.

Bow waka waka wow, user

asian food.

Because the people who got into art school and got into the industry used to be dirty shipper trash.

So the show is sexualizing the doggos for us? That's going to make threads more awkward to moderate.

hey you don't have to link it here, but is there ANY good humanized (not dog) cadpig art from this new show?
i already searched the obvious places

It appeals to the girl demographic which in recent year has been noted to be a powerful force in the sale's world. This was uncommon in past years because only boys were said to watch cartoons and men made up the large majority of the work force.

I think we got a winner.

Baiting shipperfags

Wheres the fucking mega

Cartoon dogs that can actually speak, have attractive voices and can facially emote like humans? Sure. REAL dogs? Nope.

No, cartoons girls to go after guys who look even more feminine than themselves.

Me too.

but... they are dogs.

Nah, a Rottweiler

Maybe? I don't truly know. I just want the Husky to be a bottom.

I knew from the moment I saw that dalmation's design that somebody behind the scenes is a dog fucker

Attached: 1485164470431.jpg (577x409, 59K)

This!
And why not pair her with her brother?