Anyone read this?

Anyone read this?

Attached: 51fwWeMVB-L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (333x499, 38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ohjoysextoy.com/watersports/
psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
anthropology.net/2008/09/26/the-impact-of-polygyny-on-human-genetic-variation/
gnxp.com/WordPress/2008/09/26/male-skew-dude-likes-ladies/
dienekes.blogspot.com/2008/09/polygyny-in-human-evolution.html
journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202
alamy.com/ancient-attica-ceramic-with-satyr-550-bc-image214672697.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Wait. She published her fucking webcomic?

In a printed format?

SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET OUT

I'M GONNA PUBLISH YOUR WEBCOMIC

Lots of them do, even if they really shouldn't

jesus fucking wept

Is the cuckolding page in there?

Satan does.

But does this warrant it?

It's already a hard sell to ask people to fork over dosh for shit that's already online and for free. There are plenty of Webcomics out there that can justify a printed release bit this doesn't seem like one of those.

Maybe if we're getting exclusive pages or such.

I'm more curious about the furry piss fetish page

just remembering that comic makes me literally a little sick

>buys this irl and puts it in every /shelf/ thread
I have a bright future ahead of me.

Anything that promotes foreskin in America is good for me.

>It's already a hard sell to ask people to fork over dosh for shit that's already online and for free.
Convenience, user.

>if I agree with the agenda then quality doesn't matter
Outlooks like this are why Yea Forums is such a trash pile.

Attached: 1542597537400.png (540x540, 231K)

>Convenience
Hogwash, nigga

People buy hard copies either because the art is just so good they have to have it in the medium that really takes advantage of double-wide pages (SSSS or maybe Unsounded [taking Unsounded off the electric website even diminishes it because of the little flourishes Cope has on the website) or they are devoted to the creator and work and want to support them

I know people on Tumblr who despise Erika Moen
I find it funny. I used to get turned on by it. Now I just meme about it whenever the cuck comic is brought up.

also some people prefer the tactile experience of owning a floppy, I know I do.

I prefer to read comics I like in my nice comfy chair with a book in my hand. It adds to the experience.

But let's be real, no one is going to buy this garbage shitcomic in hard copy for that reason.

>Hogwash, nigga
I love that combination of words.

Attached: 1522609243373.jpg (1200x1035, 353K)

I'm now envisioning some dominatrix sitting on her comfy armchair reading this.
Classical music is playing and she's thinking about the pegging page she just read.

"Oh, you have to check to how tight he is first." She says with a surprised face.

"Hehe, sorry sweetie" she says with a nervous chuckle.

Then it cuts to her partner who's in the bathroom with an ice pack and a tube of soothing cream.

I’m so old I remember when Yea Forums unequivocally loved this artist

>Yea Forums unequivocally loved this artist
why?

I would think the internet would be more convenient than a book.

This. She earned this board's good opinion by opposing Tumblr groupthink, for which she was accused of being a gender traitor and "fake queer".

However, her showcasing disgusting niche fetishes in subsequent years has eroded that.

it's nice to have physical copies, if not to support the artist than just in case the artist ever nukes their shit. also, some artists put bonus content or commentary in the book to enhance the deal a little.

Hol up

so you're saying a comic that's basically a bunch of paid and unpaid advertisement for sex toys

A comic that is literally just a bunch of ads

is something they're trying to sell to people

>She earned this board's good opinion by opposing Tumblr groupthink, for which she was accused of being a gender traitor and "fake queer".
Source on this?

Erica was an avowed lesbian who fell in love with and married a man. Tumblr took offense that she still considered herself as queer. Erica's position was "don't hang up on labels and just be what you are", whereas Tumblr is all about belonging/excluding people in certain identities.

This was when Yea Forums was more queer tolerant (before /pol/ infested Yea Forums) and before she had guest artists with awful fetishes like furry, toilet, and cuckoldry.

How about I was here with in the threads, fucking newfag?

I see you haven't heard of the emoji movie and Ralph breaks the internet.

>However, her showcasing disgusting niche fetishes in subsequent years has eroded that.
>Trying to humanize perverts makes you an ENEMY of Yea Forums

The fuck happened to this place

>(before /pol/ infested Yea Forums)
You mean before /lgbt/ came over to shit up all the boards. Yea Forums is still pretty queer tolerant, we just don't want to hear about trannies and other disgusting fetishes.

Anyway, girl has some skill and DAR was alright. I just wish she'd keep the tumblr cancer out of OJST, but that ship has sailed.

Attached: degenerate cucks.png (728x6714, 1.1M)

What publisher actually wanted this?

If she fell in love with a man then she is bisexual. Dykes don't do dick no matter how much cocks and cock hoppers say so.

>"Hogwash, nigga"
Unironically based

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 14K)

>uncensored version
Enjoy your 3 day vacation, user. I posted a censored version of the furry piss comic and still got banned.

>asks for evidence on unsubstantiated claims
>”w-well you’re just a newfag”

Pathetic

>I posted a censored version of the furry piss comic and still got banned

You should have been shot. You're tainted

This kind of stuff makes me legit angry.

Hush you, you're distracting me!

>evidence on unsubstantiated claims

The fuck do you want? Screencaps from six years ago from threads about a niche webcomic?

I was here, you weren't. I can speak to what this board used to be like. Believe it or don't.

Here you go ohjoysextoy.com/watersports/

You know what's weirder, they made 3 of these fucking things.

This means it actually sold.

>Compersion
A name made up by std carrying poly degenerates to absolve their cheating. It's sad/hilarious reading posts from the cucked partner. It's always some guy/woman whose partner "figured out" they were poly "da whole time" and then go out and cheat on their partner of many years on the guise of "don't oppress muh sexual orientation!"

It's equally sad/hilarious when the cucker ends up striking out and their cucked partner finds someone better and replaces them.

I keep forgetting we are on family friendly 4channel now

She was trying to humanize the wrong sort of perverts.

Why though? He seems ok with it

> Things I found Interesting

The Bootblacking community. Frankly I'm surprised I've never heard about it until until I read the webcomic, as I'm a real stickler for a nice clean pair of boots. If I knew how to pay for "Custom" Wrestling Matches I'd have a girl fight end with the loser having to meticulously clean the other's wrestling boots.

All that other business is degeneracy though.

Attached: ojst.jpg (600x884, 202K)

I feel like I should be sent to a camp and purged just for looking at that.

But user how can it be cheating if it’s consensual?
If any of them are not ok then walk out
What really makes you so angry about it?

Not him, but I think it's disgusting how these people try to pretend like it's not about fucking as many people as you can. At the same time, these people pretend to be somehow more enlightened than 'normies' in stable respectful relationships, meanwhile a lot of them are on drugs and the 'relationship' usually ends in an emotional clusterfuck (pun intended).

If you wanna be a slut, go out and be a slut. But don't pretend it makes you high and mighty and fulfilled.

This one has no nudity so it's ok

Attached: 2017-03-14-PuppyPlay-Alex-Reeder (1).png (728x5820, 603K)

So it's just cleaning boots?

Interesting how she never even brought up the race thing when that's a major part of the cuckold thing. I guess she didn't want to acknowledge that it's FUCKING PROBLEMATIC.

>mfw one of my coworkers said she'd use this to teach her kids about sex

Attached: hmf.png (250x269, 150K)

>so many fat fucks

Yeah cause the fetish isn't disgusting enough.

Do you really think an Anthony Burch style open relationship is truly consensual?
I've seen to many of these relationships where one partner is basically manipulating the other so they can feel powerful when they go out and fuck a chick or dude while the other sits at home.

time to kidnap the younguns, it's for their own good

are you ready to be father they clearly never had?

>I've seen to many of these relationships where one partner is basically manipulating the other so they can feel powerful when they go out and fuck a chick or dude while the other sits at home.

This, it's always one "partner" is going out and getting trains run on them while the other slowly withers as their soul dies

Slutting about is one thing, but chaining a nigga to it destroys people

I can't help but feel that Amanda Palmer was taken out of context. And yeah I know it's her but this webcomic is pretty bad.

the most likely long-term outcome of multiple partner relationships is polygamy - one man, many women - which is very destabilizing to society because there are a lot of frustrated men who need an outlet for their aggression and dissatisfaction.

pretty much the default state of humanity is a mild sort of polygamy, where a few guys have a wife and kids and a mistress and a bastard or two but anything very widespread is bad news.

It depends. I have a friend in that relationship. She has two extra boyfriends on the side and he has like 4 girlfriends. I honestly don't know how they do it.

what did she take out of context?

>I honestly don't know how they do it.

They don't. It will go completely tits up and they'll all regret it.

They've been doing it for about almost 4 years and it seems to working for them.

Yeah, and I have friends who have been together for 11 years and married for 4 with an 'open relationship' and now they are getting divorced. It gets to you in the end, it's not healthy. You can never really trust each other.

It's a state of coping where they are subconsciously refusing to see the reality of their situation.
There is jealousy there, no doubt about it they are human ager all, itll just take a single straw to break the walls of their happy place forcing them to see the reality of their situation and how dead they feel inside.
But then they'll just blind themselves again.

Fuck those men they should all be killed

This.
It's not nurture, it's nature and there's a wealth of historical and genetic evidence. Women are wired to breed with a smaller selective class than men and that leaves a bunch of disaffected guys walking around. Poly relationships only work on the basis that men and women have an equal opportunity to select partners and that's impossible when women are biologically programmed to gate-keep men.

Why must some people lack the feeling of disgust

Attached: ugh_3.png (268x325, 87K)

We live in an age where a lot of people are aware of artists nuking their shit, so things are archived better. As it stands, there's no big sell or draw to this collection, it's all available online, for free, on demand, and anyone is available to read it however they find it most convenient. The only people who I can see buying this are hardcore fans that feel the need to support the artist, but nowadays there are better ways to support an artist.

I like physical copies and likely the artist does too and she wants physical copies of her work to exist. Cut it out with your bullshit she has the means to create it she doesn't need any reason for physical copies to exist besides "I WANT THEM TO".

Doesn't this fetish doesn't only stop at just belly rubs and walkies? or whatever the fuck they call it. I mean there have been instances when people take this kink way to far and use it as a form of degradation and harm for the puppy involved. I've heard of people making people eat dog food and making them eat shit from a toilet.

This wouldn't be half as disgusting if all women didn't look like men.

>But does this warrant it?
Yes.
She doesn't need your permission to publish whatever she wants.

What is the fetish where you want a lanky man with long legs to squat on you?

whether someone should do something is not the same as whether it should be allowed

Someone wanting it is already reason for why it should exist.

not in principle

Cuckolds are just subs that are prone of being abused by a manipulative partner.
The "feeling of being in control by letting your partner be unfaithful" is just a mask to the more common kink of being submissive.

Attached: abstract.jpg (680x684, 42K)

Because if they don't then their dads win.

Let's be real here, it's the girls having all the sex in two way open relationships. Unless maybe the guy is bi, because men are sluts, but getting sex from girls is much harder for guys than getting sex from guys is for girls (or for guys).

Yes, in principle.

Read? No.
Gawk at like it's a sad freak show? Only on this forum.

I actually knew of a guy who was in a LTR with a girl and she was the cuck. It was more that she suffered from a birth defect near her vagina and would cry out in pain if she experienced too much stimuli.

Another girl joined them and they would have slight three-ways where eventually the LTR girl would just watch was a chair in their bedroom.

Only reason I know about it was that David and Julie asked me to join them because Beth was moving away. I declined as before and after I was informed of the dealings.

I actually have volume 1 of this, and it just contains the comics that review sex toys, and touches on the safety of relatively normal fetishes like anal and phone sex or whatever. It also covers relationships and how she feels about being ostracized from the LGBTQ community being marrying someone she loved. This was before guest comics and such. Overall, it's a nice book, I agree with her message of 'dont get hung up on labels' and the reviews are cute. I also don't mind her inclusive masturbateers either, but I don't get triggered by black gay people in wheelchairs or whatever. I'm sure they masturbate too.

So is this book worth picking up?

(Despite the fact that I have no intention to?)

You can stop defending her dude. She sold 3 volumes of this shit.

You need to go deeper. The most terrifying thing a person can admit to themselves is that they're weak.

Cucks basically admit that they're not good enough not to be cheated on (i.e a weak specimen) so they're making that attempt to twist the situation in a way that would make them look strong and benevolent. "This is happening because I'm allowing it to happen", thinks the man sitting in a 4x4 cage as he watches his woman getting ravaged through a tiny drilled hole

ITT

Attached: anger.jpg (245x204, 51K)

who the fuck cares what consenting adults do with one another, there are so many better things worth losing sleep over than what two sex-crazed weirdos out of millions upon millions get up to in their spare time. I mean for Christ's sake, this site alone is full of all manner of degeneracy and niche fetishes, what the hell does getting judgmental about one specific area do for anyone? If people are informed and not abusing one another than they can do whatever they please. All the discontent I see on here comes across as insecurity over the possibility that your ego could be slighted by being cheated on, which would indeed be pretty shitty, but there's a difference between the fetish version of that and having genuine relationship difficulties with your partner.

I don't particularly care for this fetish, nor can I claim to have a complete grasp on the mentality of people who are interested in it. I just believe in the principal that people can do whatever weird (but consensual) sex stuff they want because it's a free country. It's not the government's or any third party's place to judge what is and isn't moral for people do with their own bodies. And don't give me that shit about this being a manifestation of "the degeneracy of modern times" or whatever other asinine nonsense that faggots on Breitbart and The Daily Stormer whinge about in their opinion columns. Adultery and polygamy have existed for goddamn ever now, because rulers and powerful men have had women (and men too, in Greece and Tibet at least) on the side going back to classical antiquity (as seen in the Athenian text "Against Simon" and the biblical story about Abraham and Hagar).

Okay, that all sounds very plausible in a sophist sort of way, but I'm going to need some citations to verify these claims. If you want your arguments to seem credible you can't use vague rhetoric and sweeping generalizations.

Attached: 1474996690497.jpg (438x509, 46K)

Ok, so in principle, if I wanted, say, a glossy hardcover album of bestiality then it should exist?

I wanted to do this post but was too lazy, thanks user.

As long as no real animals were harmed in the making of your glossy hardcover album of bestiality and you got the money to pay for it, go all out dude.

>Hogwash, nigga

Attached: senpai__yaaaaas_by_foxdragonlover_dczc43o-350t.jpg (471x350, 16K)

>before /lgbt/ came over to shit up all the boards
wait didn't /lgbt/ hate preachyness and shit? pretty sure there's some comics that ship /lgbt/ and /pol/ over their shared hatred of sjw shit
besides, everyone knows the one who shat up the entire site was Yea Forums with their "muh journalism!" bullshit, getting many boards to talk about what people said of [topic] instead of [topic] itself
and this was before gamergate, mind

Then it isn't fine in principle, as by your own admission there are some things that wanting is not enough to justify existing

It is absolutely fine in principle as long as you don't have to directly harm stuff to create it, as the principles of A) wanting something and B) not harming stuff can coexist. There's more than one principle at play here, this comic goes against neither.
You're a retard if you think there's only one principle at all.

Depends who you ask. Not everyone has the same principles.
In this case her wanting her comic is plenty reason to justify her comic existing. You not liking it is not nearly enough reason for it not to exist.

psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
Also note the scoop shape of the penis head and the relative size of it to the body.
Also note that women have a regular and hidden menstrual cycle and an instinct for cucking ("dual mating strategy" in more polite terms.)

anthropology.net/2008/09/26/the-impact-of-polygyny-on-human-genetic-variation/

gnxp.com/WordPress/2008/09/26/male-skew-dude-likes-ladies/

dienekes.blogspot.com/2008/09/polygyny-in-human-evolution.html

all about this study:

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202

>The human mating system is considered to be moderately polygynous, based on both surveys of world populations [35],[36] and on characteristics of human reproductive physiology [37]–[39]. The practice of polygyny, in both the traditional sense and via ‘effective polygyny’ (whereby males tend to father children with more females than females do with males—a common practice in many contemporary western cultures [40]), would tend to increase the variance in reproductive success among males.

But she did bring up the race thing. She even outright said it was problematic.

It's that one China, IL episode all over again.

I bought the Nedroid book and had it signed by the creator. Why not?

Attached: beartatobookcover.jpg (300x376, 63K)

Just because Nazis wanted the Halacaust to happen doesnt mean it should have dipshit.
Just because Dr. Frankenstein wanted to make a person out of corpse parts doesnt mean he should have.
Just because I want to stuff my face with soda syrup as a diabetic doenst mean I should.
You're a vapid rat amongst the channers here.

Cuckqueaning chapter WHEN

And also to add, you can find and Save As every Calvin & Hobbes strip or whatever, but it's nice to have a book of it in one little location, too.

Attached: 1234567.png (344x424, 313K)

nice, keep it on your coffee table and let your friends experience the magic

You're helping lead the decadence decay of civilization.
Some hot new religion or meme will take its place after the fall and I'm certain you'll hate it.

But Nedroid is a good comic where is the issue here?

Do people actually believe it was only recently that humans became sexual deviants or something? Are there people out there who fell asleep during history class so often that they're unaware about common human and think gays and fetishes are something that only started 40 years ago? Are these the same kind of people who think "furries" are new and that humans NEVER had an attraction to animals prior to Disney's Robin hood!

Attached: Queen Pasiphae.jpg (512x384, 115K)

The user was talking about there's no justification to making a printed version of a free web comic.

Archiving things is extremely important for the future. Dead tree media is more robust than computers.

It was a long time ago, like I said. She had a slice of life webcomic before this

I'm not stopping you from making purchases. I just think it's a waste.

Well you're half right. I only consider the idea of a printed Webcomic viable is if the comic has been running for so long that it went through some serious development such as a new artstyle. Doubly so if it has a plot. It's just that the idea of comedy webcomic prints doesn't appeal to me because comedy doesn't last too long for me. When I get the joke, the joke loses all future impact and if it doesn't, seeing it again will.

Prove furries existed a long time ago. Not just anthropomorphic animals, but a sexual fetish for them. There are werewolves and minotaurs and stuff in legends, but was there old pornographic art of them? I know there was erotic art of bestiality but I'm not sure about humanoid animals. There is probably a sexual element to a lot of these monsters but I think that was more subconscious back then.
I'm pretty sure a lot of modern fetishes are new, or if they existed before they were so obscure the people with them would not talk about them openly and with no Internet they would never realize others like them existed. A lot of stuff just gets 'awakened' in people from seeing TV shows. Which obviously didn't exist in antiquity. People didn't see a lot of women being inflated just walking round in their day to day life. They may have heard stories or seen pictures of weird things from legends but I'm not sure if that would trigger as strong a reaction as a video.

I couldn't get over that one comic where shoved her husband's(?) phone up her ass and shit on it.

Attached: Joker dissapoint.jpg (576x432, 44K)

Where's the link faggot?

Attached: 1551905881006.jpg (720x619, 45K)

Fuck you. I'm not looking up that shit again.

If want it, go find it. It's right on her site.

It's really just an excuse for the creator to get a bit of dosh from fans and for fans to have some tangible product to own from a property they enjoy. Plenty of webcomic people do it.

You know the first ever fantasy character was a furry right?

Attached: Hohlenstein-stadel.jpg (331x500, 143K)

Man, as much as they try to portray it as a healthy fetish it's mind-boggling that some people can look at this and think it's ok to get your jollies off from being treated as a doormat outside of sex. That kind of shit will never be healthy.

I sure don't. I remember seeing Bucko mentioned a few times. Maybe a DAR strip here or there. But loved?

>There are werewolves and minotaurs and stuff in legends, but was there old pornographic art of them?

Yes.

alamy.com/ancient-attica-ceramic-with-satyr-550-bc-image214672697.html

It's easier for me to flip through a physical book than a website or directory full of images.

Some days I'll sit and read a volume of Usagi Yojimbo or The Goon. It's not the same on a screen, because my options are either
1. Have a directory of a few thousand pages
2. Have well organized files by chapters, but have to stop reading, change locations and open up the next one

There's also the longevity. I've a physical copy of Pictures for Sad Children.

Are those really furries though? Can't tell if they have fur on their bodies. No snouts, no paws. Just tails and animal ears. By modern standards I don't think they'd be seen as furries.

Attached: zOv1pPRh.jpg (599x466, 54K)

No, because rational adults don't spend their lives thinking about sex

>mfw there are people who define their entire identity on who/what/how they want to get off on
>mfw I share a species with them

Also, that black boot/skirt combo is hideous. As a prancing, lala, homo man, I would know.

kek

Attached: clint eastwood.gif (240x228, 858K)

>Modern

This was centuries ago.

Yes.. I know. I'm saying that judging by the modern definition of what a 'furry' is (as seen in the pic I posted), that art does not seem to depict furries.

If you want to fuck a humanoid with animal features, you're a furry. There are no degrees of furry and it's arbitrary to make some kind of scale of it as well as naive to think that no human in the last thousands of years has drawn porn of minotaurs with sexy ladies.

The modern generation is not unique or special. I mean, the story of Queen Pasiphae is about a lady who has such a lust for bull cock, she hides inside a cow statue to get fucked by a bull and gives birth to the first bull/human hybrid. How is that not more degenerate than wanting to fuck some fox girl in a suit?

All that is just proof that Ace Ventura plagiarized some Egyptians.

Yes, but we can't apply out modern sensibilities to ideas from centuries ago.

What we may consider tamed and vanilla now could have been wild and kinky then.

>that art does not seem to depict furries.
They were the furries of that era just how like pop music from the 80's and 90's is different from pop music today. It's still pop, the style has changed, but it still falls under the same umbrella.

>physical copy of Pictures for Sad Children
Woah, that's like a mystical artifact of power. The power to piss of its creator with the knowledge that it's still out there.

It's mainly a result of a warped view of maturity and adulthood. They grow up watching TV, movies, cartoons, that have this caricature of what normal life is like, that becomes the template for them. They try to map their experiences onto it, and of course it doesn't line up because nobody's life is the same, but the differences make them freak out. It wasn't supposed to go down that way. As they get older and fewer things work out the way they were "supposed" to, they lose more and more self confidence.

Having sex is something they believe is a milestone, one of the necessary "stops" on the roadmap that leads to adulthood. They essentially refuse to actually grow up because they believe they haven't done things in the right order. They can't be adults because they never had sex, never did the "right" stuff that TV said they had to do to be normal.

It's sad to watch.

For $6, it was a pretty good secondhand buy.

>obsessed over sex
>can't be adults because they've never had sex
>talking about a book entirely about sex
Elaborate monica, because it sounds like you're talking two ways here.

Attached: elaborate.jpg (967x543, 72K)

Went to comic book club once and they were all gathered around a hard copy chatting about it. Even with kids present in the room.

Attached: 1516829666047.jpg (787x1077, 126K)

the person in black is cute. I think it's a girl?

Attached: lasagna.png (797x474, 298K)

Is that really such a problem?

Attached: 1553624464834.jpg (385x325, 58K)

I still remember the first time I learned about what being a cuckold meant and how everyone in Yea Forums agreed that it was the most pathetic thing any man could engage in. I hope this sentiment doesn't die out.

Oh

It's horrible

>Just because Nazis wanted the Halacaust to happen doesnt mean it should have
If you ask neonazis it should have, and America should have helped Hitler too.
>Just because Dr. Frankenstein wanted to make a person out of corpse parts doesnt mean he should have
Are you retarded? There wouldn't have been a story if the characters hadn't set the plot in motion. Of course he should have.
>Just because I want to stuff my face with soda syrup as a diabetic doenst mean I should
If you want it, you definitely should. The responsibility is yours, I am adult enough to know what's enough for me and I presume the same of others. If you're a failure of an adult that's not my problem.

Straight up child abuse

I'm beginning to think that shame may not be entirely without merit.

Attached: 1530620987385.jpg (342x316, 14K)

>Consensual
There are hundreds of posts from non-poly partners of a 'poly' asking about how they can get over their "irrational" jealousy/depression over their partner cucking them. They desperately try to keep the person they love, when in reality their partner doesn't really give two fucks about them.

I agree. You should be shamed into suicide.

A lot of people probably should

You first.

Uh-uh nigger you're not tricking me.

The comics where they give honest reviews of actual sex toys they've actually used are decent. The comics where they try to teach sex ed to grown adults are preachy, bad, and often incorrect. The comics where they let guest artist/writers explain their fetishes are...well I'm glad they exist so we can laugh at them.

You first, buddy. Set the example.

>You mean before /lgbt/ came over to shit up all the boards.
Is this what /pol/ actually believe these days

>we just don't want to hear about trannies and other disgusting fetishes.
>disgusting fetishes
>on Yea Forums
Where do you think you are?

Only way I'm jumping is with you tied to me. I see through your lies.

No way man, I don't agree with your shit. I don't want shame to exist; you're the one that wants to shame people into suicide, it's only fair you get your reasoning applied to yourself first. Now go on and stick true to your words.

>I don't want shame to exist;
Good luck banning a human emotion, bro

I can ban people instigating it unnecessarily by encouraging them all to kill themselves like you should.

>I want to shame people who think a certain way about shame into suicide

lol nice hypocrisy nigger

>I don't want shame to exist
>You should be shamed into suicide

Maybe you should be ashamed of being so fucking stupid.

>I can ban people
Can you?

No hypocrisy here. You get what you give. If you didn't want to shame people into suicide, you'd have a point. But you want to, so it's only fair you get treated the way you want to treat people yourself.

>If you didn't want to shame people into suicide,

Just like you do, nigger.

Does anyone else find the family-friendly happy-times vibe of these fetish comics kind of disturbing? Maybe it's just me because I got groomed as a kid by people who spoke in a very similar way to these comics. But I genuinely can't stand these comics, they're sickening and I'm worried about people using them for things like

Attached: 1548598682886.png (364x387, 237K)

>If you didn't want to shame people into suicide

You were literally the first one to bring up shaming into suicide you blithering retarded cunt. And you seem pretty fucking adamant about wanting it.

Nah. I want people to experience whatever shitty thing they themselves wish unto others. You wish shame into suicide, you get shamed into suicide.

That's

>I don't want shame
>Except when I do

Nice hypocrisy, nigger.

Attached: Screen-Shot-2015-06-29-at-11.20.18-AM.png (736x958, 140K)

See
You really are a dumb cunt aren't you.

Your barking doesn't matter.

Neither does your hypocrisy, nigger.

>pretending that's not exactly what
meant
Keep lying.

Nah, mine does. You don't.
Live up to your promise, kill yourself.

>Ha! My assumption is better than your objective fact

Okay, I'm done. I know your type is usually braindead but you really take the fucking cake.

So you're saying that your blatant hypocrisy DOES matter, nigger?

You're on Yea Forums dude. It's not an assumption.

No, I'm saying my thought matters. You don't.
And I still see no hypocrisy in wanting those who would harm others be harmed first.

girls girls youre both pretty

Attached: 1540674895251.jpg (204x200, 13K)

Nah, you said your hypocrisy matters. So which is it?
And I never implied I would harm anybody. That's just you being a presumptuous nigger.

Can you point me to where I said "my hypocrisy"?
>I never implied I would harm anybody
Shaming people into not publishing their comic just because you don't like it harms them.
Kill yourself for that, your life is clearly not important.

I remember one about "uncut" dildoes, something about them existing as well if you want a more natural feel, with the dildo having a case of phimosis. Really opened my eyes to how fucked up America is when it comes to dicks, that even sex-positive people have no idea what an erect uncut dick looks like.

Now I want an edit where it's this guy cucking the other car-fucking dude.

Attached: Airwolf's rapist.jpg (880x860, 509K)

>Can you point me to where I said "my hypocrisy"?

>Neither does your hypocrisy
>Nah, mine does

>Shaming people into not publishing their comic just because you don't like it harms them.

Really? Huh, I don't remember doing that. Point me to where I did, nigger.

>Kill yourself for that, your life is clearly not important.

There you go again, insisting on shaming people and demanding they kill themselves. You're quite the proponent of shame and suicide aren't you. But really there is more to life than shaming people, you know. You seem to be really obsessed with it. That's not healthy, nigger.

Hang on. There's events where people go to have their boots cleaned or whatever to get their sexual jollies off, and this bitch was just going to drop the boots off and leave?

That's not a post where I said "my hypocrisy". Are you implying "mine" refers to that? It doesn't.

>Point me to where I did
in reply to , a thread about people bitching about an author publishing
a comic they don't like being published. You're going to deny it, but that's what you imply.

This comic has every right to be published too and the author shouldn't be shamed for anything. Do you agree Y/N?

>insisting on shaming people and demanding they kill themselves
Well so far you've shown you deserve it.

There are... events where people go to get their boots cleaned up...?

Yeah, and they have more fulfilling social lives than you.

If you told me there were places you could pay to drop off your boots to have them cleaned I'd be just as surprised. That there's actual gatherings seems incredible.

But just what could you get out of dropping your boots off and leaving? Does it get you hot and bothered just KNOWING that someone's cleaning them, like those cucks who get aroused by the knowledge that their partner is off being fucked, except with boots? I honestly haven't been this confused in years.

>t. cuck

'sup virgin.

wow so u really are a cuck. that explains why ur the only hostile cunt in this entire thread lmao.

hey everyone im actually not a virgin ama

This thread may well be filled with virgins who wonder why nobody wants them while they shit one everyone's preferences, sadly unaware their hostile and shitty attitude is what makes them undesirable. That's the demographic Yea Forums attracts.
Of course people like that would hate a comic that triggers their being alone and undesirable.

I wish I was smart enough to find a way to take advantage of these degenerate fucks and make them give me money.

Female primates like chimpanzees tried to have children from multiple males in the group to prevent infanticide, so the male chimps had no idea which babies were theirs. The earliest human societies meanwhile were small family groups that enforced strict egalitarianism though equally sharing gift economies. Since the whole group cooperated to raise the children together and shared their resources equally, and the group was related genetically, sexual fidelity wouldn't have mattered much. That said you could have had all the women in practice only tending to have sex with the two hottest guys in the group or something. But the others probably wouldn't have cared quite as much, the kids were still relatives of some kind and they weren't competing for resources.

People who have relationships aren't so easy to exploit.
You'll have a easier time with the virgins here. Dangle a waifu in front of them and watch the cash flow.

Sounds like heaven.
I always said males need to be culled. Societies that abort female fetuses are retarded, it's male fetuses that need to be aborted in industrial numbers.

or maybe theyre like me and find the normalization of degenerate fetishes off putting.
is particularly frightening as its been theorized that fetishes are triggered during adolescence.

>males need to be culled.
wow im really seeing a #killallmen in the wild. what sort of world do you live in bruv

And why do you that? Because you're an asshole with a shitty and unwarranted hostile attitude who gets triggered at people doing anything you don't like, no matter whether that thing does not involve you in any way and does not harm anyone.
Don't worry, this is common to all the male virgins on Yea Forums.

Not art but erotica hell read the original red riding hood it's pretty much implied the wolf is sexy and is going to steal her virginity

She's dead to me since she caved to twitter mob and betrayed Laci Green. And her comic is shit too.

Access to a printer isn't exactly a coveted luxury, you can even just do print on demand these days.

>quote by Amanda "look at me and how MUCH SEX I HAVE and HOW MUCH I like to get NAKED" Palmer
Because of course. When will women learn that having a sexuality is not the same thing as having a personality.

Attached: 1549571169458.jpg (192x211, 10K)

Cuckolding is the single most degenerate fetish. I have more respect for diaper-furs that piss themselves in public than for cuckolds.

Attached: 1546682541213.jpg (900x1350, 175K)

>The "feeling of being in control by letting your partner be unfaithful" is just a mask to the more common kink of being submissive.
Being submissive towards the person you love and who loves you is SUPER different than involving a random third person to be submissive towards who kicks you out of the picture.

Nedroid is a fantastic comic and we need to have physical copies to preserve it for future generations. Good show user.

>Does anyone else find the family-friendly happy-times vibe of these fetish comics kind of disturbing
Yes it makes me nauseous. The only people I've ever seen talk about fetishes and sex this way are fat old trannies on Tinychat, talking to other old, fat, creepy mentally ill men. If a woman wasn't involved in this I would assume that it was written by a rapist.

Attached: tfw_sisters_of_battle.jpg (300x168, 9K)

Why is raceplay considered to be problematic in the kink community? Not a bait question, I'm really curious. People have kinks for roleplay with rape, sexism, animals, etc. But race is going too far? Always seemed a bit weird.

There is literally, unironically, nothing wrong with consensual cuckolding, cuckqueening, etc. between two partners who openly and honestly communicate about it.