Did this trigger Yea Forums?

>Yea Forums's rabid anti-lesbian weirdness
I been here for nearly 10 years. This shit didn't started until Korra ended.

Having dykes in your show is the safest lgbt shit you could do. Try gay males for once

>Yea Forums's rabid anti-lesbian weirdness
as a straight male who isn't into lesbians I can say it's the heterosexual fascination with chicks dyking out that's weird. Yea Forums doesn't give lezzies any more or less grief than they give fujoshits but for some reason it's "weirdness?" Nah, go eat a dick.

It's not Steven Universe so nobody gives a shit

It's been done several times, NPC.

Better than just pulling it out in the finale so that it'll be all anyone ever talks about.

People don't hate lesbians. People hate obviously empty virtue signaling lesbians. I've actually hated it for years, long before the modern rise of shitposting about it. Yea Forums's only cottoned on recently, but it's been popular for years with shitty webcomics to have lesbians as side characters or semi-major characters for browney points. Instead of any other queer relationship. The reasons are obvious: it's queer so it gets virtue points but it's simultaneously not as off putting for heterosexuals are gay men. It's in fact very appealing for reasons we don't need to waste time trying to psychoanalyze here. Or transsexuals or anything else weird and abnormal with sexuality. It's been like this forever in the US. It's not even really that the author's are intentionally doing it, that they know exactly what they're participating in. It's just that they're not as open minded and progressive as they'd like to think and it results in these sorts of compromises between what they think they need to do and their personal feelings they won't acknowledge. And it's so insultingly obvious when it happens.

Lesbians are the easy out for most writers. It's not the lesbians themselves, but their overuse without any strong writing to back it up. There are plenty good lesbians in Yea Forums material over the years, but they've been done by good writers with an actual vision of a story, not flailing idiots trying to figure out how to appear like a good modern liberal while dealing with their distastes.

Attached: 1537162825708.png (1280x720, 514K)

Stop thinking with your hole, Susan

Why would something as trendy and fashionable as token lesbians trigger anyone

>Gay people who exist to be killed off
I'm fine thanks

The "Black King in a multicultural human kingdom with magic, elves and dragons" scared away the vast majority of people who would get offended by this

No, but the fact that a monarchy allowed two queens, effectively killing the bloodline, triggers me.

Yes it does... in my pants.

There have been gay monarchs who successfully continued bloodlines all throughout human history. Where there's a will there's a way.

Dont forget we are talking about two queens, not two lovers.

While true that kings had gay lovers, they did not marry, or were in any way recognized as royalty. Again, marrying someone was used to make children, and not to actually express your love.

Except maybe in China. Im not sure they had gay royalty formally, but i wouldnt be too surprised if they did. But notice that people are stupid in the real world and sometimes dont actually do what's objectively better for their kingdom. While it may be realistic, it doesnt make it any Less stupid.

>implying
They probably have a royal consort or something.
Or magic. Dark magic.

Not like they had any impact outside making a bitch baby queen.

>Except maybe in China
>Im not sure they had gay royalty formally, but i wouldnt be too surprised if they did
China and Egypt are the examples that come to mind. Both came to the same conclusion, a male member of the family was used to substitute for the emperor/pharoh and queer queens had female 'attendants' who would keep them occupied while the man did his work.
No reason a male member of the queen regent's family couldn't impregnate the Queen (or any male of significant political importance.)

>did this trigger Yea Forums?

They weren't onscreen long enough for anyone to care about them one way or another. Their deaths weren't very memorable and didn't have much of an emotional impact.

So yes, it did trigger Yea Forums

I'm still half sure one of them is a dude

Yes it does. No tongue.

>did this trigger Yea Forums?
Didn't look at the picture and I know nothing about the show but I can with 100% confidence that Yes, it did.

forget pic

Attached: kiss1-video-thumb.jpg (558x312, 25K)

It's canon until proven otherwise.

Girl-on-Girl is a traditional straight guy fantasy while Guy-on-Guy is for female fujoshits. You don't have to love yuri fanservice and lesbo pandering to horny straight men but if you're just that angry, there is something wrong with you.

Actually getting "triggered" is loser Darwin Award bottom of the genetic barrel shit though. Two hot girls going at it = fine for the normal straight guy.

Attached: Adventure_Time_Princess_Bubblegum_Marceline_anime-322920.jpg!d.jpg (1600x900, 172K)

Best posts
Worst posts
Strange how quickly Yea Forums's quality in humor can sway

Attached: 1550600463146.gif (500x500, 263K)