MCU Viewing Order

discuss

Attached: OgXEXGG.jpg (1080x1417, 375K)

Other urls found in this thread:

webcitation.org/6EdwMPN77?url=http://collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp/aid/8230/tcid/1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Just watch them in release order, it's not that fucking hard.

If they are adding Endgame you may as well add Far From Home after it.

but ant man and wasp takes place concurently with infinity war

This
Though Captain Marvel couldnpass as a Phase 1 movie with its writing and CG

i haven't watched it so can't be sure, but wouldn't watching Antman and the Wasp somewhat spoil the snap?

So which ones are absolutely necessary for Endgame ?

the beginning of doctor strange happens exactly during civil war....

man that's a lot of garbage when you show it all together

can't wait for the stories of all the losers who rewatch each one before endgame

You can skip half of these films easily.

How is Homecoming important in any way?
Because they show the new Avengers HQ and the Iron Spider suit at the very end?
The Ant-Man movies are more relevant just for introducing the Quantum Realm.

GotG 2 was trash though

some people DO start Star Wars off with the prequels, you know

I feel like you need to include Incredible Hulk to get some context for the first Avengers film and Civil War, also Ant-Man and the Wasp for context in Endgame.

GotG2 fixed nearly every flaw of the original: making a more compelling villain, giving Gamora actual character, having more serious scenes inbetween quips

Everyone should cut out homecoming, all the peter parker parks from civil war and infinity war, and suddenly the movies become a lot better.

>having more serious scenes inbetween quips
Yeah, that's a lie. Every single character was flanderized to hell, especially Rocket and Yondu. The stakes were also nonexistent compared to the first one.

Hulk was actually intended to be the original villain of the first avengers movie, but that was streamlined into just being a minor subplot.

No it doesn't.

It sets up Peter as Tony's protege rather than just a mutant child soldier he found to be a ringer.

Quality of the movie doesn't matter, Age of Ultron is probably the worst or at least near the bottom MCU movie but it's still relevant.

If you want to a super condensed version all you really need is the Avengers movies, GOTG and Civil War.

see
flanderization is not character development.

You're the two-faced liar. Yondu got tons of character development and the stakes were flowing out the ass with the Earth getting absorbed and Starlord going to have his power taken.

Without Thor Avengers would be confusing as hell as to why Loki is a thing.

It ruined twice as many serious scenes with dumb jokes though.

What? Phase 1 had the best CGI out of all Phases by a mile. Avengers was the point where it all went down the gutter

>It sets up Peter as Tony's protege rather than just a mutant child soldier he found to be a ringer.
Eh, not really.

Eh, yes really.

No. No one for one iota thought anything bad was going to happen to any of the characters, especially Quill. There was never a single moment of tension unlike the first movie where named characters actually died. And I'm going to go on record saying that Cooper phoned it in this movie.

who died in the first movie?

But Starlord did lose his power (that he didn't know he had until it saved him from being destroyed by the gem) and Yondu died.

it really does tho, we know they're gunna enter the realm and without Antman and Wasp it's just some random plot device that pops outta no where and it explains where Antman was during IW, and if anything Civil War shows Peter as Tonys prodigy so Homecoming doesn't need to be there

And that's stupid

Groot, he came back like a minute later.

This. "Viewing order" charts are made by retards for retards. What, you think people who watched the movies as they came out had a hard time understanding? Utter stupidity.

They set it up in the first movie

My personal list, agree or disagree this is how I'd do it

Attached: sketch1553884440320.png (1080x1920, 1.32M)

And no one cared. Seriously, no one was invested in his death.

I think Civil War was enough of a introduction, Homecoming could definitely be cut without much loss. I agree with another user that Ant-Man would be a little bit more necessary since he otherwise doesn't have much of a introduction and Pym tech is seemingly going to be a big plot point.

Attached: resonates-with-tony.png (500x490, 141K)

I disagree because you got rid of all the good ones and kept all the trash.

That's objectively wrong.

This is the correct. But personally, I would include Homecoming because Civil War isn't enough to give you the full grasp of his character and the Tony/Peter relationship.

Get out more often, shut-in.

It was hardly explained, he was in there for a minute and that's all we got

>Muh preservation of a plot twist everybody knows

yes because The Dark World and IM3 are the best MCU movies ever.

IM2 Has Incredible Hulk references of the battle in Harlem, fucking retard

IM3 is certainly up there

The worlds weren't planned in a vacuum retard
Lucas and company didnt build everything about these worlds when they made the first movie. Hell the series wasn't even planned to be a trilogy

I thought the kid was really lame

He doesn't do much and Tony constantly messing with him was fun to me

So what gamers do on a usual bases?

Captain Marvel literally ties into Endgame. I know you want to be contrarian and keep pretending the movie isn't important, but it also ties into it.

Yes it does, Ant-Man is more relevant to Endgame than Spider-Man.

Also Tony is setup as Peter's mentor in Civil War anyway

wow epic consequence

>Captain Marvel literally ties into Endgame
not by a lot, the after credits scene of Infinity War is enough. the only thing we got out of Captain Marvel is a basic understanding of her abilities and personality which will be in display in Endgame regardless.

But you still have no idea who she is, which means you'll be fucking lost when none of that is explained in the movie (because they sure as hell aren't gonna waste time doing that in Endgame). It's like skipping AM&TW simply because the post-credits scene only showed them turning to dust and the explanation was "too sparse to be important".
If anything, a new character by itself is relevant to be included, no matter your personal feelings on it. Sorry.

>But you still have no idea who she is
yes you will, it's not like she won't be showing off her personality and powers in Endgame. in a "absolutely necessary for Endgame" sense
Captain Marvel absolutely is not.

>no matter your personal feelings on it
what are you trying to imply

>what are you trying to imply
You know exactly what I'm implying, don't act dumb.
>it's not like she won't be showing off her personality and powers in Endgame. in a "absolutely necessary for Endgame" sense
The post-credits scene in Captain Marvel shows her already on Earth, and there's a big chance we won't see how that happened, she'll be there already. There's a big gap between both events that needs to be filled. And again if you don't show what she's capable of before the movie, anyone would be lost because she would've come out of nowhere. It's fucking ridiculous to argue this.

>You know exactly what I'm implying
yes, and it's completely undeserved and random

>The post-credits scene in Captain Marvel shows her already on Earth, and there's a big chance we won't see how that happened, she'll be there already. There's a big gap between both events that needs to be filled.
that scene was cut out of Endgame
literally all you need is Nick calling her

>And again if you don't show what she's capable of before the movie, anyone would be lost
why would they be lost
she has a simple power set, it'd be like saying people were "lost" with Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver's introduction despite no previous movie hyping them

>It's fucking ridiculous to argue this.
er

Take out Hulk, TDW, IM3 and that's all.

>that scene was cut out of Endgame
You don't know this.
>she has a simple power set, it'd be like saying people were "lost" with Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver's introduction despite no previous movie hyping them
I'm pretty sure if they hadn't been introduced, people would've wondered who the fuck they were.

>You don't know this.
the clip was literally used in the Endgame trailer
it's like the Civil War scene they put at the end of... was it Ant-Man?

>the clip was literally used in the Endgame trailer
... No it wasn't, at all. The fuck?

what
yes it was, it's the scene where Cap and Nat are looking at something and asking
>Is this footage old?
or whatever

????
Okay honestly, did you see Captain Marvel or not? Because that's not what happens in the post-credits scene at all. None of that happens in the trailers.

Don't watch capeshit

fixed

Attached: m.png (1067x1416, 1.27M)

Unironically better.

I'm mistaken
but still, it's obvious that scene will be in Endgame in the same vein as the Doctor Strange credit scene and the Ant-Man credit scene
it alone doesn't make Captain Marvel a necessary watch

It still does because people don't know what the fuck is she capable of. You simply don't want to add it because you got a stick up your ass about her, that's all.

>It still does because people don't know what the fuck is she capable of.
you will if you watch the movie, she mostly shoots energy we've already seen a bunch of characters with similar abilities
Scarlet Witch didn't need her own movie before AOU for everyone to understand her character

>You simply don't want to add it because you got a stick up your ass about her, that's all
and where did you get that from
I'd also count something like Homecoming as not totally necessary too

Even having seen Infinity War, I momentarily thought they were turned into ants.

Chronological orders are retarded.
The best bet is clearly the chronological order, but if you must alter it, the next best thing is a narrative order:

Iron Man goes first and leads into IM2 which has references to Hulk and leads into Thor. Thor leads into Cap1 with the Tesseract, and Cap 1 leads directly into Avengers. IM3 is the fallout of Avengers, Dark World is kinda disconnected but it leads to Guardians via the Collector. Guardians 1 and 2 happen within months of each other. Then you go back to Earth with Winter Soldier, which ties with Ultron by way of Nick going underground. Ultron leads into Ant-Man by setting up the new Avengers HQ, and sets up Spidey for Civil War. Black Panther is a week after Civil War, Spiderman is a couple months after, Doctor Strange happens around the same time, and leads into Ragnarok. Infinity War starts right after Ragnarok's ending. AntWasp goes after IW, but could be before if you watch the post credit scenes separately. Nick's pager leads into Cap Marvel, and then there's Endgame.

I feel like infinity war was a contradiction of homecoming, at the end he's all like "I'm going to make my own way" and then in infinity war he's right back to "gee golly mr. Stark."

You could argue Homecoming truly isn't necessary simply because it doesn't tie into the Infinity Saga, though. Every single movie that has a post-credits tie-in directly linked to the larger arc should be included.

>This fucking order again
Why did the person who made this put Doctor Strange after Ant-Man & the Wasp? A&W takes place 2 years after Civil War (they repeatedly say this in the film), so this order is implying Doctor Strange happens maybe a few weeks before Infinity War, which obviously can't be the case.

there's a bit of a disconnect
>I don't accept your mech suit
to
>Whoa this mech suit is awesome!
but I can understand given the circumstances. it's not like Peter wouldn't be a team player in a dangerous situation like this. it would've been annoying if he wasn't. honestly though I don't really like his characterization in Infinity War with all the pop culture references—it's like they took that joke about him referencing Star Wars in Civil War and turned it into a reoccurring gag.

Avengers: introduces the team, the enemies and the mcguffins well enough that you don't need the earlier solo movies.
Dark World: it's one of the worse movies, but it introduces another stone and more vaguely "the relics/stones"
Guardians 1: introduces the Guardians team, expands on Thanos, the universe, and the Infinity Stones
Winter Soldier: SHIELD falls, sets up the Maximoffs
Ultron: expands more into the Infinity Stones and grows the team
Civil War: Breaks the team, introduces more characters, also Wakanda, and sets up the status quo for IW.
Doc Strange: More on the Stones and the magical side of the universe
Ragnarok: Shows what the last unaccounted members of the Avengers are up to, sets up the start of IW
Infinity War: First part of the finale
Endgame: Second part of the finale

Depending on how important the Quantum realm turns out to be in Endgame, AntWasp may be there as well.

More than "I don't accept the mech suit", it was like "I'm gonna try to keep things small enough for me to handle for now", and then in IW the escalation is high enough that Spidey has to step out of his niche to deal with the situation.

>>that scene was cut out of Endgame
>You don't know this.

He means the scene is from Endgame, not that it was eliminated from Endgame. It's quite obvious, like the Bucky scene in Ant-Man.

Jesus Christ, dude, she'll show up and they'll ask who she is. She'll say she's an old friend of Nick's, Thor will probably say something about the Kree/Skrulls maybe even that he heard rumors of her, then she'll say she's got big powers. It's even confirmed by those scenes they showed to shareholders or something that she'll say, paraphrasing, "let's go after Thanos, this time we'll win because I'm with you". Then she'll turn into Laser Lady during some fight and the other Avengers will be like woah.

That's all you'll need to understand who she is, without her movie.

>Just watch them in release order, it's not that fucking hard.
This. Minus Captain Marvel, never watch that.

fpbp

You're just scared to add it because you went so deep in the boycott that you can't see straight.

Dude CM adds nothing to the larger narrative of IW + Endgame.
IW already hints at her existence. Then she'll show up, there'll be introductions, maybe the typical "misunderstanding fight" and that's that.

She's nothing more than Strong Laser Lady and that can and will be established in Endgame. They did it with Doc Strange in IW. Spidey too. They even had kind of an introduction to the Guardians, their personalities, relationships and powers, for fuck's sake, and they pulled that off in a couple comedic scenes.

But that's the BEST MCU Film.

>Dude CM adds nothing to the larger narrative of IW + Endgame
Exactly, that's a huge part of why it's so good.

And we're talking about whether or not CM is a necessary watch for Endgame in terms of story.
Which it's not.

But it is, she's a new character that will join the team and you need to understand why she's there, It's like skipping Doctor Strange because "lmao he's introduced in Infinity War".

Here's mine

>why is Deadpool and Hurt Lo-
They're MCU films

>But they're not.
Yes they are.

Attached: personal way of watching da mcu.png (1690x1528, 1.73M)

Deadpool can easily fit there, considering the helicarrier and all that. I am pretty sure they made Deadpool purposely in a way that remained ambiguously in between FoX-Men and MCU continuity.
I have no idea what the rationale behind The Hurt Locker, though.

Hawkeye and Falcon never really had a backstory in the MCU beyond little bits of dialogue. Until they have their own respective movies or origin stories (which is incredibly unlikely), the Hurt Locker could be interpreted as Sam and Clint's escapades during the second Iraq War. If you remember, Sam was a recovering veteran, similar to his state at the end of Hurt Locker. Clint, in contrast, was a thrill seeker, and despite being a family man, was addicted to the thrill and challenge of combat. I could see Sam just giving up soldiering to focus helping similar vets, while Clint worked his way into SHIELD.

In my headcanon, it also may explain why Sam never really talks to Clint, even though they're on the same side - Sam is still mad at Clint.

Attached: Hawkeye and falcon.jpg (400x225, 23K)

Has anyone attempted a super cut where the entire MCU is in one epic movie?

II don't even care about Hurt Locker, but why the hell would anyone watch Ang Lee Hulk?

Are you saying Hurt Locker is Hawkeyes backstory? That is a pretty interesting idea and it does work really well nice idea user

I'm sure someone will do this once Endgame comes out.

By this logic, every movie is essential.

Look, only Avengers, Winter Soldier, Guardians, Ultron, Civil War, Ragnarok and Infinity War are essential, because they introduce new characters, change the status quo, or reintroduce characters from other solo movies adequately to the audience who hasn't seen said movies, and to the other characters in the story.

Yes, you can skip Doc Strange so long as you watch Ragnarok and Infinity War, for the purpose of understanding Endgame.
It's guaranteed that CM will be adequately established in Endgame for those who didn't see her movie. That makes CM one of the skippables, again, FOR THE PURPOSES OF WATCHING ENDGAME ONLY.

>and you need to understand why she's there
Because Fury called her
I don't have any plans on seeing Captain Marvel at least before Endgame, and I really doubt I missed much. Similarly haven't seen Ant-Man and the Wasp either.

>It's like skipping Doctor Strange because "lmao he's introduced in Infinity War"
I think it'd be more like seeing Civil War before watching Ant-Man, which I think did happen quite a lot

Attached: 68eed3c98dcf82aaf953f4f2371da090--marvel-heroes-marvel-avengers.jpg (236x228, 15K)

You get me. I also see it as Falcon's backstory, perhaps before he got into pararescue.

Look, it's already silly to consider the possibility, but there's no indication of Clint ever been in the military. For all we know he was an olympic archer and got picked up by SHIELD.
And Sam was in the Air Force, in an experimental program at that.

>By this logic, every movie is essential.
Well, mostly, yeah, that's why it's called the Infinity Saga you know?
>FOR THE PURPOSES OF WATCHING ENDGAME ONLY.
Exactly. So watch Captain Marvel, thank you.
>Similarly haven't seen Ant-Man and the Wasp either.
Why, this is stupid. Just watch them all, it's not like you have anything better to do.

>starting with literally anything other than Iron Man
That’s pure autism.

As a timeline, the image is fine. But if you’re going to rearrange the movies for a “viewing order” you should at least put some thought into it.

>Why, this is stupid. Just watch them all
I've been burning myself out watching these films since around Doctor Strange, will not go to the theatre to see them but if I ever get a good link for them online then I'd gladly watch 'em

One element of Ang Lee's Hulk ended up in the Norton Hulk movie - Norton Hulk started out in South America, where Ang Lee's Hulk ended. When they first approached the Norton Hulk, Marvel wanted a film that wasn't a direct sequel, nor an outright rebbot, but a "requel"

webcitation.org/6EdwMPN77?url=http://collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp/aid/8230/tcid/1

Besides, the Abomination and Leader never reappeared in the MCU, and Norton Hulk was replaced with Ruffalo Hulk. That has led me to believe that, like the Ang Lee Hulk, the canon of the Norton Hulk is a little dubious. Aside from Ross, no other other characters have reappeared, nor its events mentioned. I guess one interpretation I have is that the Hulk is a bit like the Joker - he doesn't really have a definite origin story. Like, sure, we know the Hulk "now", but his past is murky. Just like how he ended up being a gladiator on another planet for a few years.

Must you shill even as you concede the point?

You can headcanon that all you want, but there’s literally nothing dubious about it when it comes to official canon.
Norton Hulk is canon. Nana Hulk is not.

it would need to be under 8 hours to be considered a single, watchable cut. Origin stories would need to be trimmed down into montages, or cut all together. Most of the individual movie plots can be gutted except for the ones that directly tie into the Avenvers/SHIELD/infinity stone arcs.

It'd be a rushed, poorly paced mess, but it could work

>Aside from this character introduced in Incredible Hulk, who explicitly talks about the events of Incredible Hulk, there's no reason to think Incredible Hulk is canon

Guess Iron Man 1 isn't canon either because of Rhodie's actor change, or Cap 1 because of Skull's.

There's been several attempts, and they're a fucking mess.

You'd have better luck editing the movies into an episodic TV show.

Fair enough... The only movies I haven't seen are all the Iron Man ones and Hulk, because I don't like the characters. Other than that, I think every other movie that has come out since Doctor Strange has been good to great.
I'm not shilling anything, Ant-Man & The Wasp was very good and doesn't deserve getting sidelined like this.
Also the best way to do this is to basically cut the movies in a similar way you would cut a TV show: selecting specific short arcs from every movie and assembling them together, piece by piece, until they all find common ground. This necessarily would have to be two parts though, no way 8h can be remotely watchable.

I don't think we really know who SHIELD picks, but I think SHIELD would pick military types. Plus the character Renner played in Hurt Locker shared some elements of Clint. I'm not saying Hurt Locker is a definite telling of what Clint and Sam did, but I'm saying it may have been a similar vein. Just, I dunno, maybe replace the bomb handling with Clint's archery and Falcon doing pararescue and you'll have a story of Clint and Sam working together during Operation Iraqi Freedom, then Clint getting Sam involved in BS that makes the two hate each other.

I also see the Hurt Locker as a kind of bridge between The First Avenger and Iron Man. The First Avenger showed the "Good War", World War 2, and Cap representing America fighting what was seen as a "just war". Fast forward to Iron Man, and we see a weapons mogul whose profiteering from the Second Iraqi War. The Hurt Locker works as a bridge to reflect that war, and how second war, the more recent war, was far removed from war Cap fought in.

I would argue Norton Hulk is "more" canon than Bana Hulk. Yes, Bana Hulk isn't canon, but the Abomination and Leader have not reappeared in the MCU. You could literally skip the Incredible Hulk, and his introduction in Avengers 2012 still works. Its why I see Norton Hulk as an anomaly - until they make another Hulk movie, one that features the Leader, Hulk has a bit of a dangling plot thread.

To be fair, they got a Weaving lookalike for Infinity War. Also, Stark acknowledged Rhodey looking different in Iron Man 2. But I am waiting for the day they can digitally replace Terence Howard with Don Cheadle in the first Iron Man.

That'd be a sight.
I'd actually like a rerelease down the line, a special edition of sorts that fixed some inconsistencies, restored some scenes that deserved to be in, things like that.

But not if they Lucas it.

Abomination was addressed in The Consultant short. Sterns was addressed in some of the comics, which yeah aren't a primary source, but they're considered canon unless contradicted.

TIH events are seen in Iron Man 2. As you’ve already pointed out, Ross shows up later. It’s as canon as any other movie, dangling plot threads or no.

You can skip Iron Man 1 just fine and jump right into Avengers. You don’t need to know anything other than rich dude and cave.

Importance to the meta-narrative has no bearing on canonicity.

What you’re describing is literally the definition of “Lucasing it”

There was once an user who was cutting every movie and TV show into a complete timeline order. At the time it was like 60 hours long, I’m sure it’d be 200+ now.

Anyone know if he’s still around?

Speaking of canon, no one will ever be able to convince me that AoS isn’t canon. That show is great, and I’m not ashamed to admit it.

there's a bit of space between Ridley's Blade Runner Best Cut and pic related

Attached: 5652a055c2814424008b49be-750-375.jpg (750x375, 34K)

It is canon, and whoever tells you otherwise is a dumbass. The Russos were even considering adding them to the whole Snap scenario in Infinity War but decided against because it would feel bloated.

Jedi Rocks sucks, but Lapti Nek also sucked, albeit not as much
The kino of Victory Celebration makes up for it.
Hayden Anakin is also an improvement

well, a lot of """"comics and film""""" scholars do consider those primary sources
t. one of them

Explain what? The same thing Scott is going to explain to Cap in Endgame?

I guess you have a point there. I go with the meta-narrative since thats my own subjective approach to these movies.

Anyway I'm just talking about things like changing the 8 years card from Homecoming, adjusting the dates in Iron Man's life a bit to fix the Obadiah issue, maybe fix the mess of Thor's vision quest in Ultron, things like that.

The whole Quantum Realm thing would look contrived without context. Face it, you need to add it to the timeline, you can't just skip it when it's likely the city at the background of AM&TW will have some relevance too.

>it's just some random plot device
It's that regardless. Nothing established in the previous movies suggest it would actually be useful to undo the snap. They didn't establish it allows time travel or anything, it's just a micro-dimension where "time is weird or something, whatever fuck you".

The fuck? Contrived? It's just a vague dimension at this point, all the techno-babble is entirely fluff, the "context" doesn't bring shit, it could just aswell be the negative zone.

The trailer has a hint that Scott came out of the Quantum Realm in the past. If that turns out to be true, he'll have to explain "I got stuck in the quantum realm and fell into a time void, that's how you time travel"

I did a viewing party for Endgame. It wasn't so bad with other folks, we chatted during the duds like IM3. Six hours of sleep a night and we still had plenty of time before the late night showing of IW.

>The trailer has a hint that Scott came out of the Quantum Realm in the past
The future* (there's overgrown weeds all around the house and lots of Missing People posters)
>"I got stuck in the quantum realm and fell into a time void, that's how you time travel"
This explanation is going to happen for sure, but there needs to be a context as to how that's a possibility, since in Ant-Man he came and went from the Quantum Realm within the same minute, whereas in Ant-Man & The Wasp, it was established that someone could shrink at sub-atomic level (Janet) and come back decades later, somehow staying alive all that time.

Hard mode: Include the one-shots
Dante Must Die Mode: AoS and the Netflix shows

Ludicrous Speed Mode: Runaways

If I were you, I'd add Cloak & Dagger instead, which actually has links to the other MCU properties.

Oh man, I forgot that was a thing. Is it any decent? What are the links to the rest of the MCU?

I was watching Runaways but dropped it 2 episodes into season 2.

So boring.
But season 2 has an interesting link to Doctor Strange near the end.

I don't remember them all but I do know they reference Misty Knight by name, and then there's another reference to events in New York. Runaways was very contained in comparison.
And honestly? I thought it was pretty good, much better than Runaways, and I liked how the relationship between Tandy and Tyrone was building up. However, you won't like it if you get triggered at mentions of "privilege" and such.

>in Ant-Man & The Wasp, it was established that someone could shrink at sub-atomic level (Janet) and come back decades later, somehow staying alive all that time.
I'm not sure how you think that implies time travel in any way.

I liked Captain Marvel and I can agree with them that it most likely won't be a crucial part of Endgame . Endgame most likely will explain who she is, especially since it was written before they finalized the CM script and filmed before her movie and the Russos said they wrote her in Endgame as if she was making her debut in that movie.

>I'm not sure how you think that implies time travel in any way.
Because part of the reason why Jane survived that long was her expertise in the time vortexes she spoke about before getting dusted. That shit's important.

>However, you won't like it if you get triggered at mentions of "privilege" and such.
Not at all. Although even my boundaries started getting pushed with Runaways. I hate the term SJW, but Runaways was full of SJW shit.

Cloak & Dagger is much better though, nothing like Gert sperging out at dumb nonsense (which is part of her character, but still). This is real people with serious issues facing their lives as teenagers in their respective environments, with the whole powers thing added to it (like the comics really).

It's vague as fuck. Shit it's one sentence in a post credit scene.

>That shit's important
And exactly why they'll cover it properly in Endgame, rather than leave important information in a post-credits scene in the most side move of the MCU.

Absolutely necessary? Just Infinity War. You don't really need to know where the stones were before. You can understand everything that's going on but you wont enjoy it as much

>t needs antman and wasp to explain quantum realm tho
Well shit that's going to be millions of confused people watching Endgame then

Am I the only one that have a headcanon that Doctor Strange takes place before Winter Soldier?

Is that when Coulson has his rant about the list of other supers out there?
Is there any evidence elsewise that says it doesn't take place then?

It would at least explain the massive difference in power between him in his solo movie and in IW.

what movies are most watch to undestand the thanos storyline?

keep in mind im a DCHAD so i only watched guardians of the galaxy so far

Well you already saw GOTG so just Infinity War

The directors officially said that Strange takes place after Winter Soldier.

Insight wanted to target Strange because he was a wealthy, charismatic, and influential doctor that would chafe at HYDRA rule. Which makes more sense to me than HYDRA knowing about crazy dimension magic via computers

Don't listen to this faggot.

It would be so cool if TV show characters showed up in Endgame. Don't need to make a big deal out of it. Just have a scene like this: They're preparing for the final battle and someone says they need all the help they can get. A few of them have been keeping tabs on other superpowered people. Let's say Iron Man man picks up Deathlok and Quake, Doctor Strange picks up Ghost Rider, etc. Just have them mention their origin and/or powers in one sentence and then they just blend into the final fight scene. Not too confusing for people who don't watch the show but a nice little Easter Egg type thing.

If he only cares about Thanos there's nothing else to watch you queer

>Insight wanted to target Strange because he was a wealthy, charismatic, and influential doctor that would chafe at HYDRA rule. Which makes more sense to me than HYDRA knowing about crazy dimension magic via computers
Cool, I can get on board with that. Where was this stated, just out of curiosity?

They almost put the Netflix guys in IW, but schedule issues stopped them

It was some interview when WS came out. People were wondering why Insight wanted him and what his powers were, abd the Russos said he wasn't the sorcerer supreme yet, just rich and powerful

Depends on what you mean.

>Just Thanos's plot alone?
Avengers (sort of)
GotG
Infinity War

>All the Infinity Gem shit?
This is a bit muddier, but I'd say
Cap 1 (sort of)
Avengers
Thor 2
Age of Ultron
Guardians of the Galaxy
Dr Strange
Infinity War
Captain Marvel (sort of)

/thread

>You're just scared to add it because you went so deep in the boycott that you can't see straight.
More like I can't and won't see dyke.

Attached: Brie.jpg (1993x2225, 870K)

There was one user that combined the entirety of Phase one up to TFA, including the shorts, if that's what you meant

does everybody knows the best type of popcorn? the one that can last long during such a long streaming?

Attached: perfection.jpg (6437x5304, 1.29M)

/r/ing one with Tony Hawk's Underground

Attached: 1551651638056.png (2100x3006, 3.08M)