Post movies that are technically Disney movies, now that Disney owns Fox.
>There's an animated Disney movie in which a ten year old boy's penis is depicted.
Technically Disney
Josiah Garcia
Michael Scott
It's not technically Disney. It's owned by Disney but was made entirely by pre-buyout Fox.
Colton Nguyen
>formerly Fox
Liam Nguyen
>inb4 a million autistic complaints that they should have shown Lisa's...
Bentley Nelson
Won't stop Disney from giving Matt Groening and Seth MacFarlane Disney Legends awards at the D23 Expo this summer.
Bob Iger has decided that once you get bought out by the Mouse, your history is now the Mouse's history.
Chase Rivera
This is my new favorite Disney princess.
Daniel Jackson
Lisa has a penis?
Thomas Perry
The best new Disney Fairy
Chase Garcia
No, no they don't.
Connor Thomas
>It's not technically Disney. It's owned by Disney but was made entirely by pre-buyout Fox.
what is pixar
Levi Gray
Well this will be getting cut from future broadcasts..
Gavin Richardson
Will Disney give us the sequel we've been waiting for?
Leo Collins
Random question: Anastasia, the animated film that every other person thinks is Disney, was actually produced and distributed by Fox, right? So now that Disney has purchased Fox, do those rights go with it? Is Anastasia now actually a Disney movie?
Grayson Diaz
Stan Lee, Jim Henson, Jack Kirby, George Lucas, all given Disney Legends status for being part of things that Disney devoured. It's an easy way for Disney to draw attention to the D23 Expo and put all the focus on Bob's newest acquisitions.
Nathaniel Miller
Good taste, user. Don't dream it, be it.
Justin Clark
Yeah, but they probably aren't going to literally rebrand it as such.
Tyler Bell
I just wanted to know. Now I can be an obnoxious asshole twice as hard at parties.
Elijah Sullivan
No. It's a Fox movie which Disney now owns the distribution right to. And no she will not be a Disney Princess. I find in extremely poor taste anyway given she was a real person who was brutally murdered with her family and this movie makes light of that. Similar to Disney's version of Pocahontas. Not accurate at all and very disrespectful.
Gabriel Taylor
>It's a Fox movie which Disney now owns the distribution right to.
People no longer make a distinction between Pixar and Disney. Same diff.
Jackson Roberts
Now that Disney owns Fox that's never going to happen.
Wyatt Young
Fox owned RHPS?
Ethan Williams
I'm sure that's been the case since the 30s
Henry Thompson
Because Pixar owes its existence to Disney. They were a failing money pit before Disney contracted them to develop the CAPS system that was behind the Disney Renaissance and gave them a shot at their own full CG feature.
Adam Cook
I hope so
Dylan Bell
If you're going to do it again might as well do it right and start from the beginning. Besides kid Goku would be much easier to market as a kids movie. Just take out all the adult jokes. Besides it could definitely be it's own cinematic universe.