Please explain the meaning of the ending of the video

Unironically this. Just a very complex way of saying Fuck you to Jim Davis and his never ending cycle of mediocre garbage

...

I think the last batch of video is the last we'll ever see of lasagna cat.

They said they created hundreds that they just didn't feel like using, or spent years improving. They also set up the Garfield and Odie YT channels for the Firestarter video years in advance, and footage from an FX shows that the Dingleball one was made all the way back in 2009.

I wouldn't count 'em out yet.

Attached: PfHCAsB.gif (313x232, 956K)

Personally I just want those videos that were deleted/muted to be made available again.

DESPERADOS

Don't they have them on their site?

No, when they started they didn't like Garfield. They said in an interview after this round they kind of accepted it. They didn't love it, but they didn't really hate it either because they spent so much time on these videos.

I heard they were also working on a show that takes place in the Old West. Fatal Farm apparently has some stuff in the works and producing commercials on top of that.

>and footage from an FX shows that the Dingleball one was made all the way back in 2009.

The Dingleball and the Mouse-in-the-Cupcake ones were made during the first wave, they just didn't feel like releasing them with the first videos. I've never heard them saying they did a lot, because i know their original intention back in like 2007 or whatever was to do a video a day based on a Garfield comic that day, and then they thought that got repetitive.

It's a cycle. The Garfield jokes are stale and monotonous, yet it's still going. Like an old man that dies yet is destined to be reborn again and again.

Your face got repetitive lol

Yes but they heavily re-edited those videos over the years. The Dingleball and the Birthday video is a lot different than the earlier versions.

soundcloud.com/nerdyshow/nerdy-show-interview-fatal-farm-returns-to-lasagna-cat

tl;dl:
They just wanted to end the whole thing on a completely ridiculous, over the top note.
There's no real hidden or deeper meaning behind it.

Attached: lasagna-cat-bts15-b286d12b50c72b4814ecf12f0726e2ba5ab092da.jpg (2448x3264, 1.92M)

Still a little bummed my call never made the cut. Maybe I called too late.
But then again there were enough 0s listed.

I think they said the guy with the staff also showed up in their Robocop video as one of the guys who got his dick blown off.

The “there’s no meaning” is always bullshit said when they don’t want to reveal the meaning and let people theorize in it. It’s standard

Link to video please.

vimeo.com/86014703

I felt like they kinda dragged the joke too long on this one, but it was great to hear about the behind-the-scenes in the interview in They said that they went on Robocop forums to find a fan who had the costume, and were lucky to find out he also had the car as well. Then they had a friend who was working on some show that dealt like a hospital or something and she made like a bunch of prosthetic penises and smuggled them out for them.

I admire how much effort they put into calling Jim Davis a hack, its a masterpiece.

Fergalicious and Breakfast with Tiffany's is linked to Vimeo, but Desperados is linked to and blocked on YouTube.

Or because THERE'S NO FR*CKIN MEANING DUDE!

Sorry that your two hour long "THE DARK MEANING BEHIND LASAGNACAT" video got obsolete.

These are the people who think there’s no meaning to the sopranos ending because the creator wouldn’t say what it’s about

>m.youtube.com/watch?v=KgmoMO66uPg
>be from Poland
>never watched it before
>only saw 07/27/1978 so all I knew was that this channel uploads english videos
>it's a woman giving birth scene
>starts speaking in polish
welp, that scared me more than it should had.

There's a difference in the creator not telling you what it's about and the creator flat out admitting that it was never meant to have a meaning.
Hell, stuff like the Polish dialogue just happen to be the result of a coincidence since the actress wrote in their resumee that she could speak it and FF thought it would be funny and increase the pretentiousness of the scene.

I'm going to take the creator's words over the meaning behind their work over some random nitwit. Except maybe if Victor Salva tries to claim the monster in Jeepers Creepers totally isn't based on him being a child molester.

Why is this type of people always trying to kill any sort of fun discussion about the possible interpretation of thing by "LOL DUDE THERE'S NO MEANING"? Ok, so you personally wasn't invested in a work enough to derive any meaning from it. Why should it stop other people from sharing their speculation?

The creator's words are not the end-all-be-all en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author

Death of the author is nothing but tripe created by college professors to justify keeping their job after authors called them out on their nonsense.

A true artist doesn’t give up their intentions with a piece. Some find it too personal to give up or don’t want to stop speculation. It isn’t always final
And it very much can just bring a ultra-pretentious way of saying Garfield isn’t funny. That’s still a reason.

Oh my god shut up nerd.

Because it's an elitism thing. Initially, with artsy movies, it was like this: if you "understood" the metaphords, you're smart; if you didn't, you're dumb. Of course, no one likes to feel inferior, so the people who just watched movies for pure entertainment inverted it: if you didn't understand anything, you're normal; if you found some meaning that literally isn't there, you're a pseud. I'm pretty sure this has existed for almost as long as cinema itself, but I think socialist countries like USSR kinda popularized this approach worldwide in the 20th century, with their cult of "simple-minded working folks", which, in turn, created a wave of "marginalized artists" like Tarkovsky who could get famous by the sheer virtue of being oppressed and misunderstood by the regime.

tl;dr because people cannot fucking discuss movies without projecting their inner insecurities

Cringe
user.exe has broke

>the article literally states when and where the term originated
>but surely the epic Yea Forumsntrarian knows better

Garfield isn't funny. That's all that is being said.

>objectivity
>in [current year]
eat shit pseuds

Aurora Borealis, who?

Attached: Good Lord What is happening in there.jpg (1366x768, 231K)

>Implying twisting the author's work to fit your own ideas isn't peak pseudointellectualism

I'd make a Lasagna Cat wishlist of strips, memes and songs I'd want to see for S3, but the element of surprise has always been what makes these vids.

I want them to make a video on the strip where it's revealed that everything is a figment of Garfield's imagination and the second part of the pipe strip.

>implying taking everything the author says as final isn't peak plebeianism

Shut up Justin Roiland.