Expressing Myself. My Way

Society doesnt give a rats ass about your expression. The more you try to force it the less they want to hear about any of this shit. You feel like a girl but you have penis? Well thats your fucking problem not mine.

Attached: penguins-fact.jpg (1170x530, 78K)

It can help. Otherwise youre in gamestop threatening to beat up a kid wanting to be called a lady

Best Girl Tier
>Renee

Great Tier
>Darla/Darren

Good Tier
>Ariana

Average Tier
>

Bad Tier
>Skyler

Shit Tier
>Charlotte

Yeah, it's just fashion. In various periods of the past it wasn't unusual for guys to wear skirts, dresses or jewelry.
However, clothes are a form of non-verbal communication. They represent our social status, function, rank, subcultural affiliation, personal preference etc. Wearing a highly unconventional outfit is like saying something in a wrong place or at a wrong moment. In a situation like this it's your call whether you alter your clothes to fit in or simply ignore the weird looks. Don't expect the society to be able to figure you out when you don't play by their rules.

Attached: e066a96dffdc56dc399c01c9edbb2cbd.jpg (768x1000, 181K)

HOLY SHIT
THEY DON'T WEAR CLOTHES AT ALL
The liberals fucking lied to us again

I get fashion and self-expression I just disagree with the gendered labels the animation put on an otherwise cute cartoon, especially after establishing that it was ok to be a tomboy (but no girlish boy counterpart hmm).
They were correct in saying expressing yourself shouldn't depend on whether you're a boy or a girl and should have left it at that.

Girly boys are just traps in denial.

Yeah. It’s like if I wore a loincloth and started identifying as an African or Indian.

What if you identify as an African or Indian penguin?

I see we're both spamming the same thread.
Renee is best btw.

Who is second best?

They are naturalists.

>gender is a social construct
>but if you're a boy that likes girly things and dresses like a girl and vice versa that means you identify as that gender
I don't understand this bullshit.

Lewds of Charlotte when?

What if I'm a guy who likes girly things and would like to be a girl but I'm perfectly comfortable being a guy and I prefer dressing in a masculine manner in any case? Which Hogwarts house does that put me in?

That entire video was pure autism.

Attached: 6a7.jpg (479x451, 30K)

That means you have a fetish my friend.

So, what I'm getting from the video, is that all this gender confusion stuff would be solved if everyone just stopped wearing clothes. I agree.

Attached: mime ok.png (405x663, 394K)

Ok everyone shut up, where the fuck is the porn already?

Attached: ducks.jpg (640x436, 59K)

What would you search the porn under?
I don't know what people would tag this.

youtube.com/watch?v=4z9_L9FXA3o
this channel has good waifu material

>Thanks for watching, and have an AMAZE-ing day!

because that would actually be sensible, and is what society WAS working towards before trannies ruined it.

it doesnt help that society has had a lot of its gender shit backwards for a VERY long time
I used to think I was just being "different"
now I realize no, i'm the normal one. roman-influenced western culture is the anomaly. a short haircut on a man is what's deviant and effeminate.

It's a scam to encourage people to be hopelessly self-obsessed so they don't pay attention to getting swindled by government and crony-run big business.

the human condition is a litany of endless suffering
what does it matter how you dress and how you feel when ultimately you will die and be forgotten like the trillions of beings that came before you

Ow, the edge.

Fun fact, only 2 of these penguins are the ones doing the fucking.

tfw no cute trap penguin bf
why even live?

You have to find her.

i reported the youtube vid for animal abuse

>T. PETA

Attached: you're all degenerates.png (1144x641, 863K)

Attached: 1552756406821.jpg (1170x530, 108K)

NOOT NOOT

All their eyes look the same to me.

it's the little eyelashes

Oh shit, you are right.
Immersion ruined.

Bryce

That's a bit racist.

Tracksuit girl, definitely.

Then killing themselves afterwards.
Should just have skipped the surgery.

>1990's
>don't judge a book by its cover, how a person dresses doesn't define who they are on the inside, being a bit effeminate doesn't make you less than a man, there is more than one way to be a girl.

>2010's
>Your clothing defines your identity, if you don't adhere to rigidly defined gender roles you are no longer that gender.

How is this helping?

Attached: ariel.jpg (163x169, 3K)

It is just not helping.

Surgery is a last ditch effort.

Sex is genital. Gender is your identity. Yes, it is bullshit and don't believe their bullshit.

There are many proofs, experiments and evidences that behavior and interests are made by your hormones from your genitals. Or else how did our ancestors survive through many bullshit generations?

Funny how we've actually gone backwards since the 90's "progressive" era. They were actually doing a much better job at making things gender-neutral.

Attached: c6f86bab3302a6892800889bcddd3dc1.jpg (902x1274, 265K)

Similarly, if the term "tomboy" is slowly being considered misinformed because it implies that certain interests don't pertain to girls, why is the term "non-binary" not seen as equally stupid?

The 90s was the last period of actually progressive thought, 9/11 was the event that began to pull everyone into increasingly nonsensical and radical camps

Bitch, say that to Chuck Jones' face.

Attached: chuck jones.jpg (276x193, 46K)

This insanity of today has roots in the '60s if not earlier.

The 90s sense of progressiveness had its roots in the same things, in fact the 90s fucking loved to glorify the 60s. The difference is that people are now championing the parts of the 60s about that used to be considered extremely fringe, like the actual not even misusing the word communist mob riots of the late 60s.

Eh only in the last 80 years or so.
This is a young FDR.
Effeminate clothing was seen as acceptable on boys because it made them look more innocent and precious.

Attached: k2_items_src_97aa066dcc42404e7602768333af5659(2).jpg (406x520, 112K)

The elements that are now in power had their roots in the 60's, particularly the power/linguistics people who equate actual physical violence with unkind language. There are a cadre of unknown philosophers championing a complete destruction of ALL social structures, including language. It's fucking insane. It's how we have people today screaming that racism is limited to certain races, or that burning down Baltimore and rioting in the streets is an act of "protest." It's nihilistic solipsism.

Attached: Capture.png (1276x715, 520K)

And then she grew up to be a carpet muncher.

Gender is SEMANTICS. Different people have different definitions. Obviously they are talking about gender as a societal role not biology, and societal roles are changing whether you like it or not. Can you retards get that through your head? Fucking no one thinks putting on a dress changes your biological gender, but if you act like a women in all aspects and dress like one then you essentially fit the socially defined role of women.

She also grew up ready to shit on the lady who made her career and was insanely eager to take her spot in the show.

based trannies

>Gender is SEMANTICS
It literally isn't, though.

>Fucking no one thinks putting on a dress changes your biological gender
In at least three countries it is a criminal offense to point out what you have just pointed out.

>act like a women in all aspects and dress like one then you essentially fit the socially defined role of women.
How does a woman act, user? You silly goose you.

The percentage of suicide successes has never been researched. Try finding it anywhere, it doesn't exist. You can make an inference with some research in related fields as I have in the past and it roughly translates to a 300%-600% increase in suicidal teens. Even if it was investigated in depth the success rate would be skewed as many parents would not report the truth or choose not to participate due to their grief and direct involvement in the death of their child.

The truth is, letting your kid embrace an untreated mental disorder is in fact detrimental to their life. Shocker.

>In at least three countries it is a criminal offense to point out what you have just pointed out.

Which?

Taught monkeys about the concept of money then the female monkeys will start prostitution themselves for the money.

>It literally isn't, though.
Words are subjective. Just like "Liberal" means something different now than it used to mean, the meaning of the word Gender in SJW lingo is not the same as the way you're using it. Neither of you are incorrect, and the societal definition is somewhere in between.
>In at least three countries it is a criminal offense to point out what you have just pointed out.
I'm fairly sure I would not be arrested for saying "Wearing a garment of a certain gender and fitting the stereotypes of a certain gender does not change your DNA" unless I was saying it a harassing way.
>How does a woman act, user? You silly goose you.
"Woman" is a role defined by society, however the people we call Women act is how a Woman acts.

Words are not subjective. They mean what they mean. Deliberately misinterpreting words is not how language develops. You cannot Finnegan's Wake your way through a conversation and accuse someone of being intolerant for not understanding you.

And yes, in Germany, England, and Canada, you can be criminally prosecuted for saying "wearing a dress and pretending to be a woman does not make you a woman."

"Woman" is not a role defined by society any more than "infant" is a role defined by society. It is a word referencing a biological reality that exists independently of social order. The social roles assigned to women are "social roles," not the designation "women."

I want to fuck the one in the kimono.

You are a furfag, Harry.

Hey you didn't read my post to prove your bullshit, fucking mutt.

>There are many proofs, experiments and evidences that behavior and interests are made by your hormones from your genitals. Or else how did our ancestors survive through many bullshit generations?

Or read image related

Attached: 41XHmSrdm5L._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (334x499, 21K)

>Words are not subjective.
For a society as a whole they are subjective. And they are actually changing as of now. The word women now refers, at least in some parts of the world not just to biological women but to transgender people.
>"Woman" is not a role defined by society any more than "infant" is a role defined by society. It is a word referencing a biological reality that exists independently of social order. The social roles assigned to women are "social roles," not the designation "women."
The biological reality, assuming it exists can exist alongside a social role that is different from the biological origin of the term itself. The word can stop referencing that biological reality, as it is currently beginning to.

>Words are not subjective. They mean what they mean.
being prescriptivist, yikes oof wow

Wowser.