>all you need for your mediocre animated movie to make money and be fellated by everyone is a "unique" artstyle and the illusion of diversity
Do you think it will set off a chain reaction of copycats that will ruin animation for the following decades like Shrek did?
Go to sleep Wes, you lost fair and square
Anything great will do that. The hacks always chase the last popular thing, to the point it becomes a standard until and sometimes lasting after the next popular thing. Do you even remember the age of shitty platformers in games?
Not every copy is bad, like the flintstones, but for every successful cooy theres a river a dog vomit.
Name one other movie that looks as good as that, OP
This. Nobody gives a shit about "Pan Up, Pan Down, French Song, The End" anymore, Wes.
Literally any this year. Another movie that looks as tryhard appealing to millennials though, that's a tough one
>Anything great will do that.
But Shrek and Spider-Verse aren't great, they're successful, which is a vastly different thing.
>"unique" artstyle
Is there a reason for the quotation marks? Do you think the art style of the movie is not unique, and if you do, where have you seen that style before?
Oh you weren't trying to make a point, you're just stupid. My mistake
You're accurately describing this movie and its audience somehow though