Where the fuck is it?
Where the fuck is it?
First one was decent and somewhat original, the sequels are unoriginal cashgrabs and essentially the first one recycled for retards.
>he doesn't like DIGITAL STYLE
you should be ashamed
>cashgrabs
>use interesting visual styles and look like they took real effort to make
No.
I'm friends with one of the producers. I'm afraid it's not happening guys. Turns out is was way more expensive than they imagined. They are going to release one "city" episode (that's how he called it, I've no idea what that means) and set up a new kickstarter afterwards
But how much style have you had today?
Too much style makes your teeth go grey.
>muh speshul effecks
It's still a milked out motherfucker of a "series"
Proof or gtfo
Weren't they screwed over by AT&T lost their production company and everything
they are two different products, at least thats how i choose to see it.
you're wrong, but it's okay.
Was great until they entered retarded deep theory lore territory. When MatPat makes a video about it, you know its gone bad.
Matpat milks literally anything
whos matpat
The guys that made the Sans is Ness theory
There wasn't enough TIME
Matpat is a parasitic whore who latches on anything popular. Him taking a theory about something means less than nothing
The parody made by Yea Forums was the beat thing to come out of this.
youtube.com
They were but they did appear at Sundance film festival a while ago and supposedly were looking into potential partners to help the funding.
I don't think they really mentioned how that worked out though.
Most of them are better than the original though. I'd say the original is actually the second weakest one behind the third, with the fourth one being the best.
>PS3 games
I lost it
nice
That's how I look at it as well, at least in terms of meaning. Like how the first can be taken as it own sort of critique of teachers in kids shows but the whole series has it's own thing going on.
>vidya waifus
too fucking real, god I hate Yea Forums most of the time
DICK
put me in the screencap
could be a case of "My uncle who works at nintendo" but budget issues are the most likely candidate for sinking a project like this.
If I remember their partners actually got bankrupt like a week after the reveal.
Bitch ass hoe
I really liked the third. Catchy 'entirely too upbeat for the message' song, convincing edutainment style cult parody, neat message about gradual indoctrination that gets progressively weirder and further away from the initial lure, and a specific definition of fulfillment being pushed onto impressionable people.
Not the best, but it does everything I want out of these shorts. Which is present something bizarre and off putting in the guise of Sesame Street style baby shows.
>This is the story of Micheal
The first two were good, than it become recycled shit.
>gets progressively weirder
Lol so randomXD
>the initial lure
There was no lure, faggot.
Such a beautiful empowering parable 'tis.
>Ugly and WEAK!
>They called him a FREAK!!
>So he lived on his own underground.
I would EASILY give them Kickstarter money but I honestly believe the cost of this is SUPER high
>>gets progressively weirder
>Lol so randomXD
Are you retarded? Beginning with the first that's the basic set up for these. Are you really so contrary that you can't even take that at face value?
No, you're retarded. The first two had basic set up of something gradually getting worser and still in context to the original permise unlike the later ones.
>getting worser
You sound like you're nine years old.
>still in context to the original permise unlike the later ones.
The original premise being a disturbing parody of children's shows like Sesame Street. I don't see how 3, 4, and 5 don't share that premise.
Cashgrab is literally the opposite. All the clever hidden ironic product placements and trying to sell kids cartons of oats.
The "ransom" kickstarter campaign was dated to a date in the 1950s when the first commercial children TV in Britain was shown. It is literally a parody of Cashgrab children's TV. If you think it is a Cashgrab then it is a bit above your head, mate.
>The original premise being a disturbing parody of children's shows like Sesame Street
I talked about the original premise as of specific episode such as the first one being on creativity, etc, brainlet.
Only truly bad one was the love one, you're just too hard to please.
Are you ESL, because your sentence is a jumbled mess. I hate being a grammar fag but it sticks out so much I can't ignore it.
>first one being on creativity, etc,
And the third one being love, and the fifth being the food groups, etc. As the episodes progress they get weirder sooner, but the basic concept is still there as it was in the first.
>Blocked in your country
>When MatPat makes a video about it, you know it is something that exists.
2 > 3 > 5 > 4 > 1 > 6
These are good. Thank you.
*ring(
OHHHH! LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE MADE A SHITPOST!
A SHITPOST (SHITPOST)
SHITPOST (SHITPOST)
>As the episodes progress they get weirder sooner, but the basic concept is still there as it was in the first.
No, it went out of the original massage, meaning the weird shit no longer has any connection to it.
D I C K
And what, according to you, was the original "massage"?
didnt they have help from conan
>Love episode culminates in a love cult
>Computer episode culminates in a cgi mess
>Food episode culminates in Duck getting eaten
>Time episode culminates in everyone dying of old age
>Creativity episode culminates in a manic stream of consciousness
More like "When MatPat makes a video of it, you know you've made something popular that he wants to leach views off"
Mexican thirdworlder here, copyright can suck my dick. Leakbro delivers.
The computer one was great.
>that transition to neo folk for micheal's cameo
>When MatPat makes a video about it, you know its gone bad.
nah it just means it became popular