Do you think Gigantic will still get made someday? There's a lot of demand for it.
Do you think Gigantic will still get made someday? There's a lot of demand for it
20 fetishfags on Yea Forums doesn't equal a lot of demand.
They might pick up jack & the beanstalk for another project one day
Gigantic itself is never coming
>There's a lot of demand for it
riiiiiiight
Sounds like a boring concept but garbage like wreck it ralph sequel was made in its place so it kind of sucks it was canceled.
Delusional fetish fags COPE
Nah, I just don't see the potential. I get the fetish-fuel, but I don't see the narrative worth. So it's not like they're saying "I refuse to do this because some people might jack off to it." Honestly, Disney has never been so naive. It's simply that they said "Ok, I don't really see a story here that is all that enthralling to the modern world."
I mean Lasseter and his ego bullshit was probably the reason it didn't get made so maybe
Then again under Jennifer Lee WDAS is basically a (bigger) directionless corporate-run shithole so you know who knows.
It would be a good way to try out some new animation technology. Like, imagine the film was made in first person.
It feels like a really simple appeal though. You have a guy who doesn’t think he needs any help trying to save the only friend he has, forced to rely on a girl who’s both a giant brat and a bratty giant who’s driven away all of her friends. So both have to work together and be the only things they’ve got to try and do something unselfish for once. It seems like such a Disney plot arc. Fill out your setting with stock children’s fantasy “the good common people are enslaved by the big giants who seem evil but they’re just misunderstood”, badabing badaboom.
That IS interesting. I just don't think that you could sell that to anyone. Certainly not Disney.
Sounds more Pixar, than Disney, honestly. But you present a story that could have been done well, I think your post convinced me of that. And I guess it's probably redundant to say "regarless I'm not surprised to pass on it because they didn't have a good crew for it any it was only a B idea," but that's how I feel (now).
Not really necessary.
Ankama has already adapted this fable.
The "new" animation technology they were apparently going to try was rotoscoping hand drawn 2D animation over 3D CGI.
They did it with Paperman but they thought it's still impractical to do on a feature length film.
And one of alleged rumours on why it was canceled was because they couldn't feasibly do it on a feature length film.
But since Into the Spider-Verse came out and it was also 2D rotoscoped over 3D, there is a chance that Gigantic will get made.
Also:
>tfw Disney was going to do a new animation style
>but Sony, out of all studios, beats them to it
What if the giant girl turns out to be trans and that's the real reason why she lost her friends because they were very prejudiced people and that's what turned her into a bitter and mean person but Jack can see that she's still beautiful and through lots of character development she becomes nice again once she realizes that there are good people out there who are accepting of her. I think this would be very fitting for Disney and also something fresh, and the fan art would be even more excellent because the dick only makes it better.
Is that the technology they use in Land of the Lustrous because if so that one beat both of them to it and also looks amazing.
AFAIK, Land of the Lustrous was pure CGI that is cel-shaded.
Cel-shading is basically making 3D look like 2D through use of shaders and/or filters.
The technology that was used in Paperman and Into the Spider-Verse was rotoscoping, which is drawing over CGI by hand.
Rotoscoping is often done by drawing over live action but Paperman and Into the Spider-Verse used CGI instead of live action as a reference for rotoscoping.
You can see rotoscoping over live action in films like Snow White, Anastasia, Titan A.E., Waking Life, and A Scanner Darkly.
>There's a lot of demand for it.
I assure you that the majority of people who've seen every single Disney/Pixar mocie don't even know this was ever going to be a thing.
I don't see it. The only ones demanding it were fetishfags on Yea Forums; nobody else knew about it or was looking forward to it. If they couldn't make the story work in the past, I don't think they'll be able to make it work later either. And from what I've seen, most of the time when Disney scraps a project, they won't touch it again.
I've been wondering if their writing difficulties originated precisely from the fetish aspects of the movie. If you're writing a little girl who's also a giantess, how are you going to make sure her platonic friendship with a grown man doesn't encourage weird fetish creeps?
Some of the content they released already looked very much like size difference fetish art, which might otherwise be not that bad except that the giant was still a little girl.
Speaking of fairytales and ankama, when the fuck is abraca coming out?
I hope not. Fuck all of you giantess fetish faggots.
Someone who isn't Disney should do it and just go full fetish with it. Make the R-rated movie that people actually want.
How have I not heard of this before? You'd think this would be something Yea Forums would bring up all the time.
>There's a lot of demand for it.
Citation?
>There's a lot of demand for it.
By people who like vore and giantesses. What one are you OP
Giantessfags < Footchads
Why would there be any demand from people who like vore in particular. Also same size vore is pretty rare, if you like vore you tend to have macrophilia as well.
Like you said, vore is usually accompanied by macrophilia, and Gigantic had a size difference like that. Besides, the original fairytale that the movie was based on had a giant who ate humans. Gigantic would've attracted vore fetishists for sure.
Yeah but I don't think anyone has ever let fetishists stop them from making a movie. Like why would it even be a problem, it's wank material if you're into it and easy to avoid if you aren't.
>tfw no giantess loli keeping me as a pet
I don't know their exact reasons for abandoning the project, and it's entirely possible that the existence of fetishists didn't play a role. But since the premise of the story seemed highly similar to some giantess porn comics, I can't help wondering if they felt uncomfortable writing some of the core elements of the story (such as a friendship between a young girl and a grown man, or a giant using an unwilling tiny man as her personal plaything).
>There's a lot of demand for it.
Yet, Disney dropped it in favor of capeshit
No, they dropped it in favor of Wreck It Ralph 2 and Frozen 2. Marvel Studios works on films independent from Disney.
>footplebs
>above anything
Well, at least they had the self-awareness to realize that consent is important even if the woman is the one with the power.
I was not at all interested when learning about this movie potentially existance at that time. But now I'm just willing to take it just because I'm so fucking tired of disney sequels and remakes with nothing new to add. I'd rather have this giant fetish thing made than another remake, fucking kill this trend. I still feel physically sick after Hermione and bad CGI Beast the movie.
>Hey remember how foot fags liked Repunzel
>Make that but bigger
But in all seriousness, being made the Tangled writers was the reason I wanted it damn it.
Steven Universe is making me into giantism. I hope so.
I really wish I could have liked BatB but it was one of the safest remakes I have ever seen. The original film is a classic but I felt nothing from watching the remake. And now Disney is making dozens of them because it made so much money and I worry they're all going to be equally pointless. At least do something daring and new. I haven't seen Maleficent but I like the concept of it as a radically different take on Sleeping Beauty and I wish they'd at least do more like that. Make Aladdin a gay woman instead, people would be mad but I'd take it because it's something fucking different.
I haven't watched much SU, how frequently does it have that kind of stuff?
I think I actually saw a picture of giant Rapunzel in one of the threads about this movie, I have a feeling there's some crossover appeal here.
I hope not. As a macrophile, I don't want my fetish to be associated with pedos. And since she's underage, I myself wouldn't be able to fully enjoy it either.
He said while posting an Adventure Time character.
I hope your image was merely intended to convey your sarcasm.
Not that frecuently to be honest, but the BD porn is pretty good.
I'm pretty sure the macrophile fandom is filled with pedofags since it's conception.
She was Billy's girlfriend, I'm pretty sure she's not underage
fucking this lmao
Finn, however, is underage.
Remember, it goes both ways.
Really I think the fact that Gigantic was canceled wouldn't be as awkward or notable if they didn't explicitly make a reference to it in Zootopia.
>Do you think Gigantic will still get made someday?
It took Disney years to crack Frozen, but it happened.
Literally Astrid.
Which is probably for the best, it wouldn't have been anywhere near as delightfully gay if it happened back then.
It was a pretty minor joke, I don't think anyone besides autists like us even noticed it.
Plus, it was a shady weasel selling "movies that haven't even been released yet." It actually makes sense for some of them to be movies that didn't even end up being made, and you can presume the DVDs aren't the actual movies and are some sort of "7 Grand Dad" situation.
I don't think it's that awkward; that scene was too small and unimportant to matter.
Frozen is kinda exceptional in that they kept trying to make a movie out of that story over and over again. Most cancelled Disney projects don't get picked up again like that.
Also, Frozen started out as an adaptation of Snow Queen but went through multiple changes, and the end result turned out to be something entirely different than the original concept. If they some day decide to retry doing Jack and the Beanstalk, it likely won't be the same movie as what Gigantic was supposed to be.
Well it's pretty hard to make an adaptation of Jack and the Beanstalk that won't tickle someone's giant fetish so really the only barrier is getting that story adapted.
Personally though, I think it's high time for a new version of Gulliver's Travels but with a female protagonist.
Yeah, giants are a pretty essential part of that particular fairytale. But as for the giant little girl that people on Yea Forums wanted to see: she wasn't part of the original story, so if Disney were to retry making a Jack and the Beanstalk movie, it's not guaranteed she'd survive through story revisions.
It was OUR time!
You're right about that, but at the same time it is a Disney fairytale movie, and it's VERY rare for those not to feature girls. True, they might age her up, but they might not. I think she's more likely to survive revisions than other things might be.
Also, here's a cool idea for a change that would deal with one of the aforementioned problems: Make Jack a little girl as well. Then there won't be any problems with the age gap because they're the same age and there won't be anything sexual between them because they're both kids and they're both girls. Problem solved! Heh, heh.
This thread was made for the express purpose of showing giant lewds please, let's try to get things back on track
>how are you going to make sure her platonic friendship with a grown man
Isn't Jack from Jack and the Beanstalk always a BOY?
And about the rest of what you said, I really don't like that whole "She's gigantic and she's being abused even though she's the abuser! Oh what a world we live in the agony the degeneracy!" Fuck you. I am so sick of bastards like you going around pretending that if something bad happens to men it doesn't count because, men. Fuck you and die in a fire. Seriously die of a horrible painful disease as I'm I'm tired of the whining of hypocritical bastards such as yourself.
It was, but there's been a surprising lack of that so far. Usually some dude seizes on the opportunity and just starts dumping his folder.
Man you had better shut your mouth because when women gain the ability to turn giant you are gonna be in a whole lot of trouble.
I dont't think Gigantic will be made.
I'm just tired of the hypocrisy. You can have little boys who are underaged (they can be underaged teens or worse pre-teens like Ben from Ben 10) and no one says anything if a grown ass giantess woman shoves him into her pussy because, male. That is a load of shit. I hate this double-standard garbage bullshit that that son of a bitch likely represents. It's always what goes UN-said what explains what that guy is all about. And see this the image is A-OK because the underaged one is a boy. Fuck this shit.
It ain't fair bros.
There was definitely going to be a scene where she has to hide him from another giant for his safety. We were on course to have a big budget Disney sequence where a cute giant loli shoves him into her mouth and akwardly tries her best not to gulp him down into her hungry belly. He might even have taken a slip down her gullet while she frantically tries to hide her panic from her fellow giant as he plops into the half digested remains of her lunch sandwich down in her stomach. That could have even been the end of the movie. She has no gag reflex - and she breaks down in tears as he's slowly digested inside her for hours on end like food should be.
It's not fair bros! The furfags got a movie!
If she has no gag reflex she could get like a piece of string or something and use it as a rope to pull him out though. I don't think I've ever seen this kind of thing done in a movie, it would be a pretty fresh and new idea.
Dude, this was just the first giantessfag image I found on my computer. Well, technically, not the first one, but that first one would get me banned. But whatever narrative about hypocrisy you're trying to push here most likely doesn't apply. Finn is ignored not because he's a boy but because he's the tiny one. So if the tiny one was Fionna, it'd be the same deal. People usually find the giantess attractive, so it's her who matters more. It's not a gender thing, it's a fetish thing.
Also Finn could be 16 here, which is legal in Russia
Look up the movie's concept art. The Jack from Disney's movie looked less like a boy and more like a man.
Not sure how to even respond to the rest of what you said, except that you're jumping to (incorrect) conclusions and you should probably get off the internet if it's making you that mad.
Rest easy user, I'm pretty sure there are some particularly degenerate people amongst furfags just like you who dreamed of Zootopia ending with Nick slowly tearing Judy to pieces with hyper-realistic gore and jerking off to it. And it's just as stupid of an idea as yours, and they're just as pissed about it.
>Russia
Let me guess, you have one of Gadget?
Wow that guy got owned awfully fast. Makes me think a certain someone shares our tastes. Good to know, man. Good to know.
Is it time for a big girls thread again?
Okay I have a new idea for the updated version of Gigantic. Jack is now Raiden and he spends the whole movie fighting giant girls with awesome music.
Now that I'm thinking, the original story did feature a giantess; the wife who was sympathetic towards Jack and helped him out. So even if the current story were scrapped, the original source does still have a friendly female giant in it. I suppose she probably provided very rough basis for the girl in Gigantic.
yes
excellent
>I hope your image was merely intended to convey your sarcasm.
Because this is a very sexual image, right.
>There's a lot of demand for it.
really? show me proof.
Well, he is looking up her skirt.
!PUT EVERYONE IN JAIL IMMEDIATELLY!
I think there's more a demand for a new princess film which is possibly why this has been shelved Been shown time and time again that little girls don't want to dress up as other little girls, they want to be princesses. Can't make the giant older as you'd have a weird dynamic.
No doubt the next movie will be another culture exploration movie and we'll get another CONSIDER THE COCONUT element dominating way too much screen time and getting in the way of telling a simple tale.
Couldn't the giant girl be a princess? I don't see why they have to be mutually exclusive, not like this is trying to be a super faithful adaptation anyway.
I don't know why this is so heartwarming.
Instead it should be bellyfilling.
Yeah, filling her belly with so much of the white goodness that it comes out of her mouth.
Come on, man. You know we're talking about vore.
>Gigantic
Threadly repost.
Young princesses don't sell (see brave)
It still hurts.
>want giantess loli
>Not thick mommy giantess
It's sad that you even have this saved, let alone feel the need to post it every time.
The mother was going to be a storm giant.
I find it sadder that he spends so much time here that he's actually able to post it every time. People on this site really have no life.
>There's a lot of demand for it.
Size-difference/giantess/foot-fetishists=!a lot of demand
Watch, he's going to come back and say "Hi Diaz". People like that are too predictable.
"I only wanted this movie to get made for the porn"-the post
fpbp
I am the only one that was looking for it because the movie was going to be set in spain (my country) and not because has a giant fetish?
Wait. You mean you DON'T have a giant fetish?
I find it hard to believe that someone can have the fetish for these specific characters. They're so fucking weird looking. Are macrophiliacs so starved for size content that they'll take anything they can get as long as it's big?
>Come on
Don't mind if I do.
No sadly because it's still a millennia ahead of its time.
>tfw can look at this picture and see it as size art
Yes. Anymore questions?
This thread is disgusting.
>most of the time when Disney scraps a project, they won't touch it again
Beauty and The Beast, The Snow Queen. They may do something similar but it probably won't happend before a loooong time.
>sexual between them because they're both kids and they're both girls.
No, you've just swapped out the heterosexuality and standard lolicon fetishes for lesbian loli on loli fetishists.
>tfw terrifies of giants
if I ever saw one in real life I would fuckin have a heart attack there and then. Fuck giants and fuck this movie.
Maybe it'll be like Frozen, and finally get made 50 years later
Ironic, since you posted Gwyn
He’s not really a giant in lore, just a dude with the soul of sunlight. DS giants are much MUCH bigger
What if the giant is a cute girl?
That's half of fucking Yea Forums bub, from Yea Forums to Yea Forums
Why we shouldn't want a female Gulliver's Traves:
>Today would never depict a female as gullible as Gulliver
>No hilarious scene where Gulliver pisses on a fire to extinguish it
Not as bad as having a giant reveal of Gigantic at D23 2015 complete with panels & an inflatable bean stalk. Why the fuck would they announce anything they are not fully committed to?