The irony of The Simpsons pulling a Michael Jackson episode off the air because of fake news

The irony of The Simpsons pulling a Michael Jackson episode off the air because of fake news

Attached: giphy.gif (480x360, 1.26M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6pnoQqlygQs&t=
youtube.com/watch?v=9yTTEwBLfUQ
youtube.com/watch?v=zYx0vLfpRYY
amacdonaldlaw.com/blog/2016/may/what-is-the-difference-between-innocent-and-not-/
nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/05/us/harvey-weinstein-complicity.html
youtu.be/jTVxiarGTPs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Sep.

They can't help themselves being retarded.

>"What happened to you, Al Jean? You used to be cool."

Attached: 1315758344351.jpg (200x148, 8K)

>i cant believe a corporation is avoiding controversy what happened to muh artistic principles??
can you stop talking like a 12 year old for one minute you underaged faggot

>Another episode of Yea Forums defends pedophilia
Like anyone except boomers watch the Simpsons anyway.

>i cant believe a corporation is avoiding controversy
They only create controversy by pulling episodes, no one would have paid attention to one in hundreds of simpsons episodes otherwise, and even if they did it's highly unlikely it'd become a big story

It was Brooks that pulled it and issued the statement.

>fake news
What fake news?

>They only create controversy by pulling episode
what controversy? a fucking article on some geek website and then everyone moves the fuck on. that's not a controversy that's some nerds giving free clicks for nothing.

>Michael Jackson has been proved innocent by the law
>"But...the mainstream media tell me that he is pedophile!
Can you be more NPC?
youtube.com/watch?v=6pnoQqlygQs&t=

You aren't defending pedophilia for watching the Simpsons.

It's like holy shit what's the plan, erase everything done by Michael Jackson???

Just one of the most famous bastards ever.

The ones that keep accusing Michael for pedophilia

You know they never found him to be innocent, they found him to be not gulity but not innocent.

Nah. You've changed, man.

That's what it's called "innocent", retard. Or are you still butthurt that justice did their job right and the accusations have been proved to be baseless? Seriously, get a life.

The proof that Michael Jackson was not a pedo: no one defends him.
A guy who was as famous and beloved as him would have the entire population of Los Angeles defending him if he had actually molested kids.

Just look at how people still defend Polsanki for full on smashing 13 yo anus.

Attached: index.jpg (190x266, 9K)

In the legal world there is a huge difference between innocent and not gulity. The fact that there was trial means there wasen't enough to prove he was innocent

>How do you prove or disprove something that happened inside his house years ago.

He kept raping women after that, too, and no one cares. All I want is for this smug old fuck to die of pneumonia in a solitary cell, but noooo.

Same way you prove a murder with no weapon or body, witness testimony.

>no one defends him
Because millions upon millions of nobodies do that already. At the height of his popularity, MJ could've run over your dog, and you'd probably apologize to him for getting his car bloody.

I mean that pedos network with each other, right? Even shit-kicker Mussie ones have their grooming gangs.
The top level pedo network(s) are powerful enough to almost completely crush stories about each other.
That MJ's story wasn't crushed suggests he was not in that network.

Not saying that they don't, but he wouldn't have needed that. He literally had starstruck parents grooming their kids for him because they were so enraptured being that close to the King of Pop.

>defending pedophiles
Never change, Yea Forums

Innocent until proven guilty you fucking retard.

youtube.com/watch?v=9yTTEwBLfUQ

youtube.com/watch?v=zYx0vLfpRYY

Very nice but that dosen't change what I said nor does it change the difference between innocent and not-gulity.

Or did OJ turn innocent when I wasen't looking?

congrats on being a goddamn sjw enabler

amacdonaldlaw.com/blog/2016/may/what-is-the-difference-between-innocent-and-not-/

Innocence is still to be presumed if not proven guilty.
If Jackson were alive, he'd be able to -- and win -- a lawsuit for defamation against the documentary.

It's why Jonbenet Ramsay's brother won a lawsuit for defamation. You can't say "Well the court never said he didn't do it, just that he wasn't guilty, so he did it." unless you're a brainlet of the highest order.

There's a lot of real evidence that Michael was a pedo though.

Erasing history is what Communists do.

This is how you know that despite his appearance, Michael Jackson was still a black man.

No there isn't. His house was raided by the FBI numerous times and surveilled for years and the most they found was legal heterosexual pornography.

>actual testimony of dozens of maids and employees finding things like michael naked with kids or showering with them doesn't count
lol ok

Did any of those claims get verified in court? Because otherwise no, they don't count. The man was found not guilty, anything else is just NPC cope.

But it does pose for a good quote. If you want to reclaim your childhood, build a Disneyland, not a Neverland

>they never found him to be innocent
>they found him to be not guilty
My god Yea Forums you've done it again.

Attached: keyboard.gif (480x360, 623K)

>people don't lie
>people aren't paid to lie

Everybody knows that Michael Jackson is being cancelled in 2019 because he told people not to Jew him nor kike him.

>It would've been controversial to keep an episode in syndication that aired 20+ fucking years ago starring a man who died a decade ago

Going aside how stupid that is, there are currently 655 episodes of The Simpsons in syndication (And only on two channels: FOX and FXX) and the rate at which this specific MJ episode airs on a yearly basis I'm going to guess is as low as in the single digits.

he personally admitted to sleeping in the same bed as the kids - his bed - when they were on 'sleepover'

that was quite likely because the forensic evidence would conclude that the kids had been in his own bed, for which there was no reason on earth except that he was fucking them because he was a pedophile

he's dead so he has no reputation to defend, which completely invalidates your legalese semi-argument

you might as well be arguing that if Carlo Gambino were still alive he totes would have had his heroin trafficking conviction overturned

not gonna happen, irrelevant argument

it's what Franco and Hitler did too

Courts are fucking stupid. Not guilty carries a presumption of being innocent, but it's not proving you're innocent because everything legal has to be super fucking convoluted.

Meanwhile newspapers exchange the two because saying someone was proven innocent reduces the chances of some chucklefuck accidentally leaving the not in not guilty off and causing a huge lawsuit.

Shit's retarded.

>The man was found not guilty, anything else is just NPC cope.
says the brainlet who I'm sure also rants about how the courts cant be trusted because they're run by jews

imagine being this dumb

>it's what Franco and Hitler did too
When?

>Jews bad
>blacks bad
>BAD BAD
>Courts BAD rigged for blacks to get away with crime

The absolute state of brainlets in Yea Forums

Attached: iu[1].jpg (427x350, 31K)

Fuck off memeposter

>parent of child who MJ allegedly abused was deep in debt and had to pay over 60,000 in child support payments.
>Maids in question sold story to tabloid and were deemed to lack any credibility by investigators.
> Police questioned every other child and none of them testified that MJ did anything wrong.
>Parents of children accused the police of aggressive and illegal questioning hellbent to get a conviction.
> LaToya Jackson admitted that her claims were lies motivated to extort her brother's wealth.
>Child alleged that Jackson was circumcised and he wasn't.
>Kid wasn't aware of MJ's vitiligo on his butt.
>Second child's parents had a history of fraud and perjury
>George Lopez and Chris Tucker were both conned by Gavin Arvizo's parents.
>The rest of Arvizo's family's testimony fell apart on the stand when they forgot crucial details of the story they made up and blew the case apart.

No wonder Jackson was acquitted. Twice.

>people still buying the MJ pedo shit
Dude was fucked and acted sketchy, but if he actually did anything wrong it would be everywhere and not just in a bullshit documentary that only talks with the "victims."

>If you don't mindlessly take everything everyone on the tv says as fact without questioning it, you're a tinfoil hat alt Nazi conspiracy nut
Kek

JANNY ARE YOU OKAY
ARE YOU OKAY JANNY
JANNY ARE YOU OKAY
ARE YOU OKAY JANNY
JANNY ARE YOU OKAY
ARE YOU OKAY JANNY

Attached: 1539765118951.jpg (623x702, 177K)

If Michael Jackson actually did shit, they would have found out ages ago. Literally what's the point of trying to pull something from someone that died a decade ago and shove it back into the spotlight? It's just yet another wave of people trying to ruin the good name of MJ. The dude, despite all of his flaws and Peter Pan syndrome, legitimately wanted to change the world through his music and reach out to people that felt hopeless. Macaulay Culkin has also been adamant in his defense of the man. Just let the guy rest in fucking piece already.

The saddest thing though is that the moment someone is accused of rape of any form, that's just it for them. They'll never live a normal life ever again, especially with the way the media blows shit way out of proportion.

>MJ holds hands and cuddles with little boy
>little boy looks to reporters in that moment and tells them that "Micheal said if i love him I should sleep in his bed"

Choosing to not broadcast a tv show is not the same as unpersoning people.

>Literally what's the point of trying to pull something from someone that died a decade ago and shove it back into the spotlight?
To distract from Harvey Weinstein, maybe? Back when MJ was alive, Weinstein actually paid reporters to write nonsensical articles about Jackson. Not even joking. There's no proof, however, that MJ committed any type of sexual assault but the media is acting like it's fact. Safechuck and Robson both coincidentally recalled their abuse when they were having financial torubles and they can also get away with smearing MJ's legacy because there are no laws against the defamation of the dead. This whole case is such a fucking obvious cash grab.

Jackson wasn't a pedo because real pedos are protected and don't have the whole media trying to erase their very existence

There is no irony here. they pulled it on direct testimonies. The joke there was about someone who had never met Homer Simpsons.

>better singer than MJ
>superior writer; unlike MJ he never had to resort to outside songwriting from industry hacks like R. Kelly (a fellow pedophile)
>supremely talented multi-instrumentalist; didn't have to rely on session musicians like MJ
>produced his own music
>fucked 10/10 goddesses like Sherilyn Fenn and Vanity; didn't have to prey on children like MJ

Attached: prince-favorite-color-not-purple.jpg (2000x1360, 548K)

The depressing part is that people are actually buying into it because they just believe all the bullshit the media spouts at them.

>Using Prince to shit on MJ
Fuck off.

Direct testimony from people who've already swore in court that he didn't do anything to them, sure.
So their liars or purgerers

Personally I don’t care if Jacko was a pedo or not. He’s fucking dead. He made good music. Enjoying his music or voice acting for The Simpsons isn’t supporting a pedo because it cannot benefit him in any way, because he’s fucking dead.

>Nobody really quite knows the full extent of their rivalry, and I think both of those guys had an interest in keeping it somewhat mysterious because they are both mysterious dudes," Knopper tells writer Dan Hyman. "But when Prince was doing his Vegas residency around late 2006, Michael was living in Vegas. Will was a guest artist at the Prince residency, but he was also friends with Michael. So Will arranged it for Michael to be a guest in the audience at Prince's show. No one knew it really, but Prince knew it. There was a point during the show where Prince was playing bass and he came out into the audience with this giant bass—he knew where Michael was sitting—and he walked right up to Michael and started playing bass in Michael's face. Like aggressive slap bass."

>The next morning, Will went over to Michael's house for breakfast, and they're talking about Prince and the show. And then Michael goes, 'Will, why do you think Prince was playing bass in my face?' Michael was outraged. And then started going on. 'Prince has always been a meanie. He's just a big meanie. He's always been not nice to me. Everybody says Prince is this great legendary Renaissance man and I'm just a song-and-dance man, but I wrote "Billie Jean" and I wrote "We Are the World" and I'm a songwriter too.'"

Has there ever been a more bas(s)ed man?

You know how I know MJ wasn’t a pedo? Macaulay Culkin says he wasn’t and was never molested.
If MJ was a child molester there’s no possible fucking way he could have resisted prime child Macaulay.

>Over dinner in West Hollywood in late 2003 or early the next year, the men had discussed a plan to help Mr. Weinstein avoid embarrassment. While married to his first wife, he had become involved with someone else, Mr. Benza discovered. A clerk at a Los Angeles art studio where he commissioned a gift for Mr. Weinstein — a painting of a reimagined “Hollywood” sign reading “Harveywood” — volunteered to Mr. Benza that a friend, Georgina Chapman, was seeing the producer. Mr. Weinstein, who would later marry Ms. Chapman, was separated and wanted to keep the relationship confidential until he was divorced, according to his spokeswoman, Sallie Hofmeister.

>Mr. Benza, then between jobs, had a suggestion. “I could supply your P.R. girls with a lot of gossip — a lot of stories — and if people come at them with the ‘Harvey’s having an affair story,’ they can barter,” Mr. Benza recalled telling Mr. Weinstein. “He said, ‘A. J., it’s got to be good stories,’ and I said, ‘Don’t you worry about it.’”

>Collecting a monthly retainer, Mr. Benza said, he reported items on Roger Clemens, Michael Jackson and others and sent them to Mr. Weinstein’s communications team, though he didn’t know whether they were used to trade away stories about the producer. Mr. Weinstein’s spokeswoman said the payments to Mr. Benza were for public relations work during Miramax’s dispute with Disney.

>After 10 months, Mr. Weinstein said, “I think the coast is clear; I think we beat this thing,” according to Mr. Benza, who recently had a brief stint as a writer for American Media and also runs his own gossip podcast, “Fame Is a Bitch.”

Damn Wesintein really did play a pat in making a mess of Jackson
nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/05/us/harvey-weinstein-complicity.html

>he personally admitted to sleeping in the same bed as the kids - his bed - when they were on 'sleepover'
I did this with my sons' friends who were all male because we were in an apartment and there wasn't enough room for the fucking 5 kids that wanted to spend the Halloween night. I slept with my head at the top of the bed and my wife was working the night shift and didn't get home until after they had got up, so I had 3 kids in the bed and their heads were at the bottom of the bed where the air conditioner was.

I was 23 and completely flabbergasted when my wife asked me where the kids slept and I said 3 in the bed with me and she immediately scolded me, apparently having no faith in my purity and asked me to never do that again. The interesting thing was she never even said "what if the parents asked where they slept" where the misunderstanding could be serious, it was all about her bad faith.

It's not my fucking fault I didn't know the kids were spending the night until 11 PM and two kids' parents already made plans and I wasn't staying up until 4 AM driving who I could get home home.

This. In general I feel like the whole thing is dumb Americans overreacting to anything that doesn't fit the mold. Michael Jackson was pretty weird, he had some pretty clear mental issues especially later on and he loved to spend time with children playing with them, being childlike himself etc. and the media and populace were like OHMYGOD HE MUST BE A CHILD MOLESTER without any evidence and then the money hungry ones jumped in to claim like "oh yeah he molested me 15 years ago when I was 9 where's my money".

Last time Yea Forums talked about this there were some weird reports from Corey Feldman, though.

>weinstein framed jackson with sex crimes to cover up his own sex crimes

It sounds like conspiracy bullshit but it's true. Man, I hate Hollywood. Its nothing but trash.

I feel like whether he was a pedo or not, the episode should still air. Are people going to pull The Pianist from circulation because Roman Polanski was a provable pedo rapist?

Well, I used to sleep in the same bed with my mom and dad when I was a kid. I doesn't mean they fucked me, you nigger.

Feldman said MJ never abused him and couldn't see how that was possible but now he's retracting in case he is wrong because he's aware the pedos can be sneaky people. He doesn't want to say he is or isn't now because he's a fence sitter.

Half of Hollywood defends Polanski and wrote letters about how his art outweighs his crimes and the media still goes on about how he's a great director. When it comes to Jackson though, the media is brutal to him and they're acting like he really was a child rapist despite no evidence. The difference is quite striking.

Makes me think Jackson is innocent, honestly. The treatment they've been giving him is so damn bizarre. Feels like Safechuck and Robson are using the MeToo movement to frame an innocent man for money. I mean Hollywood will hurl fury at a dead Jackson but still give Bryan Singer work for fuck's sake.

I don't even want to ask rhetorical questions like that. Things that used to be extreme parodies only a decade or two ago are today real life. Everything's already gone so far beyond insanity that I really can't predict how much further it's possible to go.

>Yea Forums poster goes on Yea Forums to start a Simpsons thread and defends Jackson
>Yea Forums poster then turns around accuses Yea Forums of defending pedophiles

Nice try, Yea Forums poster

>he personally admitted to sleeping in the same bed as the kids - his bed - when they were on 'sleepover'

>that was quite likely because the forensic evidence would conclude that the kids had been in his own bed, for which there was no reason on earth except that he was fucking them because he was a pedophile

The parents were also there. The whole family would share the room. MJ's bedroom was the size of a duplex.

This. Safechuck's mother was always hanging around at Neverland (photographs and other people prove this) but he says that he was always alone with Jackson because his mom was never allowed at Neverland wtf?

safechuck sounds like a furaffinity username ffs

This differentiation has nothing to do with the legal aspect of being innocent and only to do with the public's opinion of you and the damage to your reputation that can occur after being found not guilty of a crime. Legally, he is still innocent because he was never proven guilty. But because he wasn't found innocent before going to trial the charges weren't dropped and so he had to prove he wasn't guilty instead, now retards like you can be all "duuurrr he's not innocent, he's just not guilty"

Because they're lying about the sexual abuse just like every other person who accused Jackson of hurting them as kids. I cracked up when the documentary said Jackson would walk around his house with an erect dick when everybody close to him knew him as a Christian prude in his youth who was ashamed of his own nakedness due to vitiligo.

>sources

>Half of Hollywood defends Polanski and
Not any more.

Yeah, I lived through all the Jackson trials and saw how his friends would exploit him for monetary gain so it's funny to see people STILL falling for it in 20 fucking 19, 10 years since croaked even.

>Because they're lying about the sexual abuse
When there is concomitant testimonies, it's a bit bold to call those lies as if it was a fact.

Book burning. The nazis did it, but no idea if Franco did. It's not implausible, given the whole facism thing.
In a similar vein, niggers are trying to do the same kind of revisionism with KANGZ N SHIET.

Attached: 1286316846833.jpg (490x635, 42K)

Also bold of the media to act like MJ was definitely a child rapist and his entire career and personality was something he created just to have sex with kids.

Idk the truth but a grown man continuously having unsupervised sleepovers with little boys even after being accused of molesting little boys is sketchy as fuck.

youtu.be/jTVxiarGTPs

Attached: 1542949346521.jpg (512x384, 47K)

The nazis burned books and writings by jewish and/or communist authors, anyone openly saying that facism is bad, and early sexual science. Basically everything that's memetically hated on here.

That's like saying supporting confederate statues doesn't support the south because those faggets are dead.

This, and because of how things were I had to until I was like 14. My room was given to a hobo.

>The nazis burned books and writings by jewish and/or communist authors, anyone openly saying that facism is bad, and early sexual science.
>Basically everything that's memetically hated on here.
Remind me what's the difference between Nazi Germany and EVERY WESTERN NATION back then?

And yet look At How fucked up you turned out to be

>and his entire career and personality was something he created just to have sex with kids.
That is not what the media are saying., don't do strawman fallacy, please.

>Book burning
You are aware that in Nazi Germany, the jews didn't willfully burn their own book right?

Sorry, but it's dishonest to compare this to Nazi Burning books when it's the creators's own choice.

Nobody is claiming the parents raped the kids. They're claiming the stranger the parents let rape their kids was the one doing the rape

Michael Jackson wasn't either of the kid's parent nor even his official tutor.

I can't tell if you're being stupid on purpose or it's just genuine lack of reading comprehension.

Attached: 1301870498926.png (604x453, 49K)

You know there were effectively african kingdom, right ?

Attached: GoldTrolling.gif (533x609, 98K)

They're also pulling it from blu-ray.

Nazi Germany kept records on who they killed, when, and how, which made retracing the tragedies and proof of massakers possible. Trail Of Tears for example doesn't have that.

I thought they weren't releasing Simpsons on physical media anymore.

>13 year long investigation by the FBI found no evidence of molestation
>one of his accusers was caught on tape saying he only wanted money
>another went back on what he said completely, too acting classes in preparation for the trial
>another supported michael for years until he was rejected as the lead choreographer for a 2012 tribute show, only then claming he was raped
>dude hes guilty lmao watch south park and family guy
never change, Yea Forums

Attached: fce3333.png (645x729, 32K)

>>another supported michael for years until he was rejected as the lead choreographer for a 2012 tribute show, only then claming he was raped
That's actually quit believable.

No one is defending Polanski any more eihter.

Don't forget Safechuck is millions in debt as his whole family is suing each other over inheritance and his acting career is a failure.

>witness testimony
Oh wow so reliable.

Legally, they are considered to be evidences.

I accuse you of stealing my car. My evidence for this is my testimony. You are now guilty. You goin' to prison fool.

They're pulling it from distribution.

Im also a witness, he definitely stole your car, I saw it

Dubs confirm, case closed.

I just watched the docu and I don't know whether or not the stories are fake, but it cannot be denied they're very hot.

>I accuse you of stealing my car.
>he definitely stole your car, I saw it
Go to the police and report it, then. I hope your testimonies concur.

>You are now guilty. You goin' to prison fool.
I don't think you have a good grasp of how evidence are processed in a court of law.

Yea Forums you have to believe me. Michael Jackson went thriller all night in my ass when I was a kid

>I don't think you have a good grasp of how evidence are processed in a court of law.
yeah, sometimes the court decides that witness testimony isn't enough to proclaim someone is guilty.
Sometimes an FBI investigation lasting 13 years finds no evidence to say a party is guilty.

>I don't think you have a good grasp of how evidence are processed in a court of law.
Seconding this, the whole Vic Mignogna firestorm is fun to watch.