What's the worst mainline movie in the disney renaissance? Pic related is my vote

>hating on hercules
come on, son

>it's 30 years old
so is fox and the hound

Get out of here, Doug

>horrible morals for children
Irrelevant complaint
>plot is all over the place
No not really
>prince is bland and shitty
Name one Disney prince that wasn't bland and shitty

I'd say Pocahontas. Beautiful animation and some good songs but that's about it

Naveen?

aladdin
naveen
hans
flynn

Attached: 1551410235939.png (266x266, 36K)

Animation tends be better the older it is, actually.

There isn't anything wrong with Ariel's personality or the things she does in the movie. The only problem comes from the fact that she never has to pay for her actions, as she did in the original story.

These are the some of the most nonsensical complaints I've seen about any movie

Attached: 1531258327431.png (282x302, 60K)

The Princes were amazing Chads

Another abomination thread. Disney has made only good movies.

Attached: deception disgrace evil as plain the scar on his face.jpg (960x1440, 277K)

hercules is so good that kh WANTED it in all the mainline games

Tell me what you want, what you really really want.

friends

I don't even know if I can count The Little Mermaid as an actual part of the Renaissance instead of just being the thing that kicked it off.

It has most of the qualities that the Renaissance movies would later emulate, but there's something so inherently ... classic and old-timey and unrealistic about the story that puts it closer to the classic princess movies in my head. Criticizing it feels like criticizing those movies; you CAN do it, but it feels irrelevant because they're more cultural icons than they are individual works of art at this point, reflecting an old-fashioned view on things.

Anyways, it's not the worst because Ursula's performance and the songs are so good. I miss Disney villains :/

It's so surreal to see Disney ape their competitor so bad. I've heard people say that they were ripping off the ripoff, but really, DreamWorks was distinct from Disney since the start. A great deal of their movies are shit, but there are a lot that aren't and they stand out from the generally formulaic Disney library.

Chicken Little was supposed to be one of those "subversive" twists on a classic children's tale, yet you could tell how uncomfortable the people behind it were. They had never strayed so far from the tried and true "Love story, two funny nonhuman sidekicks, villain dies off screen and nobody sacrifices anything" formula. They genuinely couldn't comprehend how to successfully break away from that, so instead we got that piece of shit. You can almost see the thought process that went into it
>we need to flip our usual style on its head
>our characters are usually cute or visually appealing, so let's make these ones ugly and grotesque
>we usually inhabit our world with appealing side characters, so let's make everyone here an asshole
>our movies aren't very funny, except for that one about that Mexican king or whatever, so let's fill this one with pop culture references. Those are funny, right?
>our protagonist is always likeable, so let's make this one voiced by Zach Braff

Honey, you mean hunkules

But the Genie was the best part of Aladdin and he wasn't the villain.

Shit taste.

That isn’t Tarzan
>Phil Collins everywhere

Underrated

Attached: 1487579780107.png (640x478, 431K)

Only correct answer.

t. Hades

>>horrible morals for children
Your kind should die.

>1st

Every time.

Is having shit taste a requirement to be a white person?

This
>muh savages
Literally the only above average part of the film.

>The Little Mermaid, only Ursula isn't evil and Ariel gets cucked

That'd be wild.

The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Boring story and characters that I didn't care about. I only watched it for Esmeralda‘s feet.

Attached: a911580e8caf0350e658ee42065dabeb.jpg (465x867, 47K)

Go to bed, Doug

>I don't even know if I can count The Little Mermaid as an actual part of the Renaissance instead of just being the thing that kicked it off.

The thing that kicked it off was Great Mouse Detective.

was not look at the sales

Where's Doug's 2nd Movie? it's been 20 Years, I'm starting to think it might not happen.

Why is it call Doug's 1st Movie? Did they expect it to be such a BIGJumbo critical and financial success that it'd warrant a Sequel?

I thought Herculad was weird too, does Hercules really need a smaller version of himself flexing constantly

Am I remembering wrong, or did this have the exact same plot as an episode of Goof Troop?

I hear ya. It says a lot when even the character animation manages to look bad in a Disney film.

I could understand it happening to one guy, but how are several people getting wooshed by that post?

Attached: pills.png (496x499, 230K)

they were gaslit

Mulan was pretty bland

>Characters
Bland
>Songs
Bland
>Jokes
Bland
>Art style
Bland
>Story
Bland

It has the best song in any Disney movie though

>Some of the best songs in Disney
>Story about an angry old guy with a LITERAL raging hard on for a curvy chocolate gypsy
>Deformed heart-of-gold-man watches as his master goes on a CRUSADE and burns down France to get into Gypsy's dress
>Movie ends with a riot outside one of the most famous catholic cathedrals on earth with spanning camera shots, and it somehow transitions to hellfire and the main villain falling to his death while clutching a demon from hell itself. One of the most brutal and metal deaths in all of Disney

>user only liked it for her feet.
Your opinion is factually wrong, sir.

Attached: 1536458638480.gif (500x372, 1.6M)

He is a footfag, of course his taste is bound to be shit.

Correct

Second worst is Home on the Range

If we understand Disney renaissance as starting from The Little Mermaid and ending with Tarzan, I've got two options: either Pocahontas or the Hunchback of Notre Dame.
When I was a kid, I found those movies unconventional and upsetting. I was used to seeing Disney movies with black-and-white morals and a happy ending where the good guy gets the girl. When those movies ended on a different note, I felt confused and unsatisfied.
Years later I grew to appreciate bittersweet endings, along with learning more about historical events and classic books. When I rewatched the movies as an adult, the knowledge of what they were based on made them feel too safe, censored, and watered-down.
IMO those two movies are too complex for kids and too childish for adults.

The post seems to be making references to some e-celebrity I've heard about but don't watch. If multiple other people don't watch him either, they wouldn't recognise the references.

>They gave Hercules a deformed clone of himself
I have spent the past twenty minutes going over the movie in my head and I still have no goddamn idea what you meant by this.

pegasus, I think

He appears at 47 minutes and 12 seconds, how can you miss him

This

The fuck? I grew up on nicktoons and didn’t even know this existed. How? Granted, I fucking hated the fuck out of disney’s Doug. Every tiny ounce of charm was left the fuck out.

is always the sameguy that hate one of best Disney movies.

Fox and the hound sucks

>Aladdin
Not a prince
>Flynn
Not a prince