What a fucking waste of Jude Law

Now it's 1/10, nobody gives a shit about spoilers.

I was really surprised by how generic he was. Yon-Rogg in the comics is a scheming power hungry bastard. Jude Law just followed orders.

Cool in theory but she doesn't sell it, especially when her acting is contrasted to Jude's

Webm should include when she offered an hand, it was cool to show her as kind of above their conflict (even though technically in the end it was still to drag his ass back to Hala)

I don't see Law as being wasted, he was cool, and he might also come back (kinda doubt it tho)

>Jude Law just followed orders.
Not really. He lies to Ronan and obviously has his own scheme with Carol but it falls apart and he concedes in the end.

When did he lie to Ronan?

All the Kree characters were boring and uninteresting.
I honestly didn't expect to be more emotionally invested in fucking Skrulls

Ronan wanted to immediately purge the planet with Vers and the skrulls on it, but Yon-rogg played dumb and didn't tell about Earth until Carol's betrayal forced his hand

I wanted more Kree vs Skrull fights, like the one on that beginning planet where they kept hissing saying go back

>male villains in female-led capeshit
Always shit.

I'm actually incredibly disappointed that they didn't choreograph a great fight where she arm-bars him and says the same line and THEN blasts him because that way it shows that her mastery of her powers is a matter of discipline. It seems like a cop out for a one-liner and was one of two moments I felt like rolling my eyes at this mediocre film.

But user, if they had a fight there would be actual tension and we can't have that!

Tumblr is praising this scene a shit ton, as an abuse victim standing up to her abuser

To be honest, MCU is great equalizer. They turn EVERYONE into meh tv-tier actors no matter how good you are. Remember when they wasted Mads Mikkelsen by turning him into another shitty marvel villain? That's right.

was he fully subservient to the Supreme Intelligence or did he have ulterior motives?

Jude Law wanted to use Carol as his attack dog to take over the Kree empire.

It's luck of the draw, some good actors like Keaton and Kurt Russell managed to get good villains to play. Blanchett and especially Mikkkelsen didn't. Who knows what'll happen with Gylennhaal...Playing villain roles is risky.

That was such a blueball.
I believe Mads' portrayal of Hannibal is the scariest villain I've seen on TV in ages so I was hyped as fuck. Should've known better.

Hela was cool, but the movie was more focused on hijinks than giving the main villain screentime and development.

>as an abuse victim standing up to her abuser

But they weren't dating and aren't related?

Maybe because that's what it is

Yes that is in line with his original character and is clearly what he was trying to do. Maybe, just maybe, they should have made that the central conflict of the movie!

You know you're in trouble when they turn Mads into a character who was formerly nothing but Baron Mordo's errand boy and try to act like he's the big bad.

Rate the MCU villains:
>Iron Monger
>Abomination
>Whiplash
>Loki
>Red Skull
>Killian
>Malekith
>Winter Soldier
>Alexander Pierce
>Ronan
>Yellowjacket
>Zemo
>Kaecilius
>Ego
>Vulture
>Killmonger
>Thanos
>Yon-Rogg

His blood is inside her now

>Ultron, Hela, and Ghost were THAT forgettable

Attached: IMG_4920.jpg (500x355, 49K)

Pretty much all terrible but Vulture

>Ego that low
what the fuck user

Now I understand how Lifetime is still alive and what kind of people actually enjoy their movies and shows.

shit I just realized this is order of appearance, I'm retarded

It's in chronological order...

Iron Man 3 had Ben Kingsley AND Guy Pearce, but was 90% RDJ being sad about thangs.

Villains exist for the hero to overcome. This is true even in "masterpieces" like TDK.

We've forgotten to see Alita Battle Angel instead.

Attached: 1552072541404.png (2518x1111, 954K)

I'd tell you to kill yourself, Alitashill, but your existence is much sadder than your death could ever be.

MCU does this shit often.

My point is the movie booked really good actors to do nothing with them. The mandarins could've been played by Kevin James and Sean William Scott and it wouldn't have changed anything.

>Alitashill

Does the idea that Alita might... gasp..
actually be a good and enjoyable movie elude you somehow? The only people who don't like Alita, have never watched it!

Fuck off, shill. Your flick is garbage and so are you.
>gasp
I changed my mind, stick a knife into your artery.

Mads was great though. He was in 75% of Dr Strange and was creepy as fuck.

Have you even seen Alita, user? How do you know it's garbage?

I downloaded the camrip because I'm not paying for throwaway trash.
My money is for something special, like The House That Jack Built.

You should get used to it already. It's rule of a thumb in MCU. All the big ass movie stars are hired to play one-time villains, not the recurring characters.

>jude tells her not to give into emotions
>brie gives into emotions and blasts him as evidenced by the look on her face as she does
>jude actually shows emotions during this exchange, brie delivers her lines cold and uncaring

how is she giving into her emotions and proving him wrong? (where she wants to prove him wrong, not where he wants her to prove him wrong). shes cold just like everywhere else in this movie when she delivers the line, so does she care or not? wheres the consistncy, where is the reality? if u were getting revenge on someone that was lying and controlling u, shouldnt u be angry, woudlnt u go for the kill? if ur above it and beyond it. why not just walk away.

cant tell if this is bad writing, bad directing, or bad acting. either way its jsut another 'huh?' moment in a hero movie of 'huh.' moments

Have you watched the camrip?

I saw Alita, and it was pretty meh.
Sacrifices all the grungy despair and personal tension of the original story for a PG Disney tour of "Iron City" featuring terribly uncompelling villains who make Ronan and Yog look like timeless masterpieces.

Not saying it's AWFUL, it's just a totally harmless Syfy flick.

I mean it's a good deal for them. Get that sweet Marvel money and media attention then go do the artsy/weird shit you want to do without worrying about money to much.

i still liked her 'but mostly to kill people' line

>All the big ass movie stars are hired to play one-time villains, not the recurring characters.
This avoids the Norton Effect, and generally A-Listers at the top of their career are reluctant to sign onto 6-film movie deals, especially ones that turn into ensemble stories.

But A-listers/Legendary Stars used in bit roles has been a thing in cape movies since the Donner films.

Attached: Jor El2.jpg (275x183, 7K)

Alita wasn't bad. problem was they ate thru plot points faster then I did my popcorn. that movie spiderman3'd hard. if it hadn't it might have been more enjoyable

>alita doesn't know who she is
>jk she does, shes just helpless
>jk shes not helpless, shes just weak
>jk shes not weak, shes just naive
>jk shes not naïve, shes in love
>jk shes not in love, shes out for revenge
>jk shes not out for revenge shes battle angel
>jk shes out for revenge again

Wow, its not often I get to talk to someone who had a Disney sooper-hero movie go over their head. What will you do when Walmart lets all of you greeters go?

prolly go back to fucking your mother.

the entire movie is a waste

My Mother is dead. You've been fucking my ugly aunt Leslie, and good on you, that poor uggo needed some action.

/thread

>terribly uncompelling villains
In my book that's one of the worst sins an action (or a horror) movie could commit.

Attached: Josef.png (550x306, 325K)

Your mom should have swallowed

>He's still alive too so they could bring him back
That's what I thought too. But then I remembered that this very movie brought back Ronan and did even less with him than GotG itself.

Attached: 1537104933077.jpg (508x508, 14K)

a jiggalo's got to do what a jiggalo's got to due, Walmart aint payin all the bills with they part time min wage.

sorry about ur favorite IP being DOA. hope u didn't ruin all those comics shooting sperm on them. one day u might be able to return them for cashback

Yep.
Chiren is just a mashup of Ido and Hugo's motives, a stupid character who becomes a tuner for psycho cyborgs BECAUSE her daughter was killed by the psycho cyborg her husband was working on. (???)
Grewishka is just an imbecile in love with the catchphrase "little flea".
Zappan is just a petty one-note Chad.
Vector is the sort of character Luke Cage would have actually made interesting, but is a total waste.
Nova, a literal mad-genius, is reduced to dull "Villain Monologue #43". Not a single memorable line. Just boring "Kill her, don't fail me again" bullshit.

Attached: Full Retard.jpg (450x373, 42K)

Why does everyone ride Ronan's dick so hard? He was a generic villain for decades and was barely more interesting as wannabe space Dredd. That shit with Crystal was fucking embarassing

This. Guys we've been doing this song and dance for 10 years, they're not going to bring characters back and flesh them out later. MCU movies outside of Avengers are essentially one shot episodes at this point. How many sequels have been set up that we never heard anything about afterwards? (Looking at you Dr. Strange)

>imbecile in love
Words cannot describe how much I hate this archetype. I get that it's point to be creepy and rapey, but it just comes off as laughable and unthreatening to me.

There was also a female vilain. Carol whoop her ass.

They can only make so many movies a year. They just haven't got around to the Strange sequel yet. That's also where there's usually no point in bringing villains back.

Two really, though one was an AI fucking with her.

>HOW DARE YOU NOT ENJOY WHAT I ENJOY

This isn't your hugbox.

They fleshed Loki out after Avengers 1. I'm sure the Spider-man villains will also be fleshed out in more movies and others will have stuff added like Red Skull did. Ronans CM role did suck though

YASS QUEEN

Really? It was really hammy and I saw her blasting him a mile away especially since she had done it before.

>Being on tumblr after the purge

For what purpose?

Is it me or does this seem anti Israeli?

>The ", good guys" are hunting down"terrorists" who are " refugees"

>Call in their war hungry blue allies to bomb the "terrorists"

>Main "terrorist" Hunter was acted by JUDE LAW

>The "good guys" have stars on their chests

Attached: 1465584663973.png (1661x515, 1015K)

Not really. The Kree have conquered a vast Empire, and aren't reliant on a more powerful Empire's resources to stave off their enemies.
They are as much Roman-esque as anything.
Also, the Blue Guys are also Kree.

Why do so many modern female-led works have such weak villains?
There used to be a time when female-led works had great villains. (pick any classic 80s horror that stars a female lead)

If Carol is not with the Kree anymore why is she still wearing their symbol? Hell even that little Skrull girl freaked out when she saw her despite Carol wearing different colors.

Attached: 1486436585729.gif (231x365, 1.52M)

Such as?
Difficulty Mode: name 3 that aren't James Cameron flicks.

Freddy Krueger was a great villain in the original film. Yes, sequels ruined him but in the original he was menacing as hell.
Buffalo Bill though that's 90s but I'll cheat because the book is from the 80s
Xenomorphs from the Alien franchise.

Alien isn't female-led, Ripley is just the survivor in that one. Aliens is female-led, and its Cameron.

What's the significance of being played by Jude Law?

Well, then OG Halloween then. Archetype is only tired because everyone copied it.
Black Christmas too for goo measure.

Buffalo Bill is barely in Silence of the Lambs.
He's a pathetic idiot who manages to fuck up a complete advantage over an enemy. Every villain in Captain Marvel is better than Tuck-and-hide Laddie.

Agreed. Too pure for this garbage. Just too pure.

You are really confusing "we need a chick to run around and scream" with "female-led".
Resident Evil is female-led.
Underworld is female-led.
Hunger Games is female-led.

Halloween is just Curtis dashing around a house scared of a menacing creep in a William Shatner mask.

>Resident Evil is female-led.
>Underworld is female-led.
>Hunger Games is female-led.
All of those are garbage. And so is Alita. At last I see the pattern.

I think it's less that they ride his dick so hard, but that he fell into a very specific niche. He was in a really interesting position (Head of an intergalactic invasion force with legends, an interesting aesthetic, and good actor) without being explained much and completely underutilized, so there were many questions. The mystique of possibility was fresh and new, especially considering that 90% of Marvel's villains have been bastardized or misused the whole way through. They mostly die and don't do much or have personality.

That's why Kingpin and Killmonger in the TV shows were so beloved. They actually had character development and did things other than scream and create blue lasers and apocalypse scenarios. It's why people like Loki, because he has a style, a personality, and conflicts.

Ronan managed to be so underused and un-fleshed-out that it accidentally created the mystique of potential, so people wondered instead of just writing him off. It's a shame that Captain Marvel did nothing with it whatsoever.

Attached: 1538659304495.png (606x843, 445K)

>Alien isn't female-led, Ripley is just the survivor in that one
She's the second in command, promoted to leader when the captain dies, and the person that the narrative spends the most time following. I don't know how that isn't female-led.

Mads actually wanted a bigger part in dr strange. The problem was his schedule was conflicting with other projects.

>Killmonger

Killgrave, I meant Killgrave. Christ that's so easy to fuck up. Killmonger is also a great example, though.

People deserve to like Black Panther because it was written like an actual film with actual struggle and a villain with actual motivation and a point.

I hate to put it so bluntly, but despite the refugee stuff currently about, if you miss that they're literally making the Skrull be Space Jews you're blind. And that's even a really bad idea considering the really unfortunate accidental implications therein.

>The mystique of possibility was fresh and new, especially considering that 90% of Marvel's villains have been bastardized or misused the whole way through. They mostly die and don't do much or have personality.
You admit Loki was good, and he was a villain in 2 of the movies before Ronan. Zola was done well IMO. Having the Red Skull be Cap's Loki would have been a bit much. Obidiah Stane was a solid villain. Justin Hammer wasn't that great and Malekith was never given any depth, but that hardly accounts for "90%" of their villains.
If you want a franchise with 90% shit villains, you ought to look at their Distinguished Competition's current universe. They have a single decent villain (being charitable).

Attached: Incubus.png (636x397, 294K)

Kilgrave was awful, m8.
I have absolutely no idea why anyone likes that faggot other than boner for Tennant.

The movie doesn't follow her perspective. She haS slightly more time than anyone else simply because she's the last person left alive.

I hope you're referring to Zod and not your pic related

I am. But the only thing that separates Malekith from Zod is that Malekith got his ass beaten by the All-Father, whereas Zod got curb-stomped by Science Dad. Otherwise they are exactly the same tier of "Muh Dying Race" evil generals.

I mean, fair points, perhaps 90% was overshooting my mental math. Point is, people love fleshed out villains. Say what you will about it, but one of the reasons Batman is so popular in the scale of DC is his famed Rogue's Gallery, who all have interesting backstories, aesthetics, and motivations, and that has been consistent across even adaptions, famously in BTAS.

If the villain isn't solid and interesting, all you have is a hero with little to go against, little resistance, and absolutely nothing without internal conflict or strife. Someone said a bit earlier about the caliber of actors being wasted, and that it could be anyone. I agree on it, but my point goes further, and DC absolutely does the same shit. If the villain could be replaced by a cardboard cutout with an evil red button to press to make bad things happen, no one should rightfully give a shit.

How was he awful? Wasn't truly the greatest but he was good. And a lot of it is Tennant boner, but that's because he's a good actor in this situation used well.

See above. He had motivations, a consistent and interesting aesthetic that was used as a visual cue, and a backstory that tied strongly into the hero. He also not only gave the hero something to do, something to fight against, but drove internal conflict and question into her own morals and actions. He was an incredible foil too, because you have this invincible protagonist who could beat the fuck out of most typical MCU problems, but had a villain that entirely worked around that and made her feel powerless against him, which further played into the theme of their relationship.

Say what you will about portrayal or writing, but that's an excellent duality to deal with for a hero and villain.

Attached: 1498166576208.jpg (311x395, 40K)

Michael Shannon hamming it up was fun at least. If Hela can scrape by on that (and I'd argue that Blanchett got both less to do and less interesting material than him), then Zod can too.

How wasn't he awful? A fucking idiot who's not even remotely menacing or scary is hardly a good villain. He doesn't even have a personality to make up for that, what with him being a boring cartoonishly evil psychopath and all.
>but he was good
No.
>good actor in this situation used well.
He was overacting the shit out of his role.
>He had motivations
Ah, yes, the extremely boring and overused one you'd find in every cop and Lifetime show.
>interesting aesthetic that was used as a visual cue
Now I know you're shitting me.
>a backstory that tied strongly into the hero.
That doesn't necessarily make the villain good.
>He was an incredible foil too
Not really. An interesting foil would've been someone not so one-note evil instead of someone whose every line screams "look at me I'm a sociopath", it's frankly very boring.
>and made her feel powerless against him
On paper, maybe. In practice he felt like a boring creep whose neck she would easily break. With the reveal that his powers don't work on her that became only more apparent. Legion did that much, much better and had a much better villain.

>Ego
>Vulture
>Killmonger
Hey, these villains are actually cool, maybe Marvel is learni-
>bastardized Thanos
>Not-Ghost
>Yon-Rogg landing on the Whiplash tier
What the fuck happened?

Attached: 1543811759307.png (289x320, 26K)

This has just reminded me there's going to be at least a 5 year gap between Doctor Strange and the sequel. I know he's in Avengers but it's not the same

The Supreme Intelligence as a fine villain. Yon-Rogg was fine as an anti-villain. He didn't need to be a Zod Hambone villain.
Your problem with the lack of Abstracts in the MCU is your problem.

I like that the pressure's off the movie. Derrickson and Cargill had years to work on the story and the script and no one is expecting Strange to be a replacement for Iron Man anymore. He could easily follow the same trajectory as Cap did, where the first movie flew under the radar and the character only blew up with the sequels.

>look at how they massacred this franchise

did jude law not want to have blue skin? i think carol would have stuck out more if she was the only normal colour person.

Is he a good guy, or is the orange man bad?

Korath isn't a blue-skinned Kree either.

Attached: Korath.jpg (1280x718, 106K)

He's a loyal soldier for an Empire that's conquering the universe in a ruthless fashion.
Make of that what you will.

So are the Kree a race or a corps like Green Lanterns?

As long as he's making the universe great again.

They are a race. Wiki can give you the long answer.

You don't have to be dating or related to someone to abuse them, what the fuck

I was sure he was going to be Mar-Vell.

He's a fairly complex antagonist. He's not fond of the overly zealous Accusers, legitimately gives a shit about his soldiers (even "Veers", who he is deceiving to serve the Empire). He tries to avoid entangling civilians in the Kree-Skrull War. He's not a one-dimensional scumbag like Zod.

What's worse. Mar-Vell becoming a villain or space Hillary?

I'm sure we can just agree that Mar-Vell being a woman was awful, women are awful and icky, and go back to 2D waifu-fapping ourselves into extinction.

You're trying to hard

Imagine if "it" put half that effort into passing, lol.

The MCU is a waste of Marvel comics as source material.

And "Space Hillary" isn't?
You shit post, I shit post back at you.

i remember watching that scene and wondering if we were supposed to care about carol's squad

for supposed air force propagana, it didn't really have much of that camaderie

i thought that scene where he's talking to carol on the phone and is genuinely patient with her and doesn't call lee pace in was nice.

How so?

>it didn't really have much of that camaderie
I'd disagree there. There are points where Yon-Rogg is obviously misleading his superiors, and yet his squad is going along with it without even raising a serious complaint. They clearly trust the guy a lot. They also have one another's backs in fights.

>Creepy as fuck.
What are you, 10? There has never been anything unsettling, creepy, or even macabre in any Marvel film, including Dr. Strange. If you genuinely believed Mads Mikkelsen to be "creepy as fuck", you may be emotionally and mentally stunted. Seek help. Furthermore, you wouldn't really be able to tell if Mads was good or not, considering his role in the film was practically minute and hardly rememberable.

DC has 3 good villains though

Jesus Christ does her face EVER fucking move!?

No.

The only thing the scene got going for it, is that its in the right stage of the power escalation.
Once she removes her limiter and starts increasing the yield we have seen a very steady increase over the scenes.
From causually murdering her former crew
To moving over the battlestation
To fighting in orbit
To fighting even more in orbit
To fighting the missiles
To defeating warships
To letting them go on mercy alone
So at this point the movie could have gone full metal jacket. Instead we basically get a Superman moment, a great one.
But the soul in me would still wanted that Full Metal Jacket insane final action scene.

Attached: Whatiwatched_cpt-marvel.jpg (1050x1240, 361K)

How should Ronan have been better utilized? I don't get it. Lee Pace does a good job, he's menacing in the scenes he's in, the Guardians have to think outside the box to beat him. Like, what more do you fucking need? A deeply reflective scene of him crying about what doodoo heads those Xandarians are?

>Full Metal Jacket

I'm having trouble putting together what you mean remembering the actual movie. Like just balls-to-the-fucking-wall?

Honestly, the continuity fuckery, the poor writing, and the constant dour face really kill it for me, but there's bits of good in this. I just wish she acted like she wasn't 200% angry all the time. People always shit on the quips in these films and I get tired of them, but fuck me did I forget what edge would feel like.

I think he was fine as is, but didn't get much development, use, motivation or anything. And I don't get why everyone around here assumes "I wanted to see more of them and get character development" automatically means "THEY HAVE TO CRY AND BE EDGY." I mean, that's practically how modern comics are written so that's probably why, but still.

The problem was literally what he was in the frame of a movie where we have to introduce and develop a whole team of people in one movie. It would be like if Loki wasn't in Thor before Avengers and that's the first time we saw him. It's a fault of the situation and writing, but there wasn't really a way to solve it.

Except they had the chance bringing him back now, and it was wasted. Because bringing him back implies popularity or purpose they way they marketed it, when it was really a cameo. Which is odd, because again, he didn't fucking do much the first time and it doesn't add much artistically and barely touches continuity, so who fucking knows.

>tl;dr: He couldn't have, it's an endemic problem with villains and how they write these movies, and that's the point

>Mads Mikkelsen
At least he was pretty much the main villain. Now think about Ben Kingsley

I don't think it's the same thing with Loki. Loki is a personal villain of Thor. They're brothers. You have to have numerous scenes establishing his relationship with his various family members, how he pretends to feel about them, how he really feels, how he's planning to backstab them, and so on.

Ronan's not like that. He's doing what he does because he has a religious hatred of Xandar that goes back for generations. The only personal connection he has to the main characters is that he killed Drax's family and was Gamora's boss for a hot minute. Otherwise it's all incidental. All Ronan has to do is be menacing and Lee Pace does a great job of that. I don't rate him highly as a villain but he fulfilled his role well enough and there's nothing about him that I felt was left wanting.

>Honestly, the continuity fuckery
There's honestly little-to-none of this.

>I don't think it's the same thing with Loki
I don't either, my point wasn't character similarity or anything. My point is, considering everything that happened in Avengers, considering they re-introduce Banner, to a point Black Widow, and Hawkeye at all, and deal with all the plot, imagine if that was the first appearance of Loki and they had to explain his history and set him up as a credible threat and character with no prior audience engagement in that film. I wasn't talking motivation there, I was talking screentime relative to all the other stuff. It just wasn't there.

>He's doing what he does because he has a religious hatred of Xandar that goes back for generations.
Which is fascinating and we know nothing about. You're right in that he needs to be threatening and he achieved that. That's why this started, this is what I'm saying. He was interesting and threatening without the time for character development, so people wondered because he wasn't just there for some reason. The time just wasn't there in the structure of Guardians for it and it's a shame. I don't think he's this in-depth awesome guy here either, but think of what they've done well with some of the other villains. They could have done something.

Implicitly retconning some of Fury's motivation and a whole scene in Winter Soldier sucks. The Avengers thing sucks but is small. The whole fuckery with the Tesseract, Shield and its name, and a whole lot not matching up to the later films sucks. There's only so much to be waved away with Fury being a super-spy and not telling people stuff. It's small stuff but details matter to me and it shows that the movie was lazily written. It was done without any care to any of the other films or the shared universe and the focus was just it doing its thing, which considering Danvers is being billed as the new face for the MCU, ostensibly, isn't a good look.

This is so god damn silly

This scene has utterly awful staging. It's a Kirk's Rock battle scene except in a 200 million dollar movie.

I feel like an idiot because I only realised here that holy crap he's Jude Law!

I thought he was good as a representation of the elitism/superiority aspect of Kree society that we really hadn’t seen in other movies.

This seriously looks like a budget TV show

What the fuck Yea Forums? You told me the skrulls are bad guys. You lied to me.

>Honestly, the continuity fuckery
?
None of it
> the poor writing
At the least it crops up in one spot around the 'Carol finishes her flashbacks and the Skrulls are victims' part of the movie.
And it stays there.
>and the constant dour face
I will give you credit for that.
Larsen isn't no Schwarzenegger. Stoicism can't carry a movie with only facial expression, you also need body language or movement to compliment it.
Its a pretty general failure Hollywood movies have.

Oh, you are right.
Not Full Metal Jacket
Lethal Weapon
Lethal Weapon 1 ends with a fight
Which can be summed up as
>They arrive in time to prevent him, and Riggs agrees to a 1v1 fight with Joshua in a violent brawl on the front lawn.

Are the Shiar mentioned or shown at all?

because she doesn't happen to have another fucking space suit, dumbass

This is TV tier acting.

Jesus christ, is the bitch even acting?

>Killmonger that low
>Thanos that low
>Loki that high
Opinion discarded

>I got chills.

Attached: oh.png (196x546, 54K)

Jude Law's acting really shows the difference between something that is refined and something that is trash.
You can watch that whole bit and fully read what he is feeling, the build up and anger without sound and she has no fucking range and is just kind of 'duh im acting' the entire time.

>Yea Forums becoming populated by SJWs

Shit, is the site going to need a /ss/ safe space board?

But why is Jude Law yelling at that block of cheese?

>/ss/
>safe space
Are you new?

>/ss/
everyone here loves /ss/

Attached: ara.png (390x254, 27K)

>Malekith above Ego
>Whiplash that high
>Ego and Vulture that low
>Thanos not at the top 5

What your post in the other thread didn't get enough attention?

I still feel bad that they wasted Michael Stuhlbarg and Rachel McAdams on Doctor Strange.

Attached: MV5BMDI2OTgyMzMtZDhlNS00OGE3LWI0ODMtOGUwYzQxOWEzODM2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUxMjc1OTM@._V1_SX1777_CR0,0,17 (1777x747, 68K)

This actually bums me out to read. I really do like him as an actor.

Based retard

>No. 1
>Not Carol
Bitch ruined the MCU.

from a screenwriting perspective, there's nothing worse you can saddle an actor with than 'i don't remember my past'. it gives them absolutely nothing to work with

What the fuck was her Oscar Bait role about anyway?

Maybe it's because I like fucking men, but this movie holds no appeal to me.

she was a kidnapping victim in room

To condemn degeneracy and protect the West.
Beginning Lenny > Ending Lenny
>Law goes all the way
>Bitch Larson looks and acts like a disinterested valley girl
So THIS is the POWER of... FEMALE EMPOWERMENT!

Attached: popewink.gif (480x276, 1.65M)

Absolutely underrated

I wonder if that season 2's still in the works.

It might have even wrapped filming. John Malkovich is playing The New Pope.

Attached: gianni-fiorito-hbo.jpg (1000x563, 715K)

She kept making the same face after she remembered her past and in the one future scene

Holy Shit, you're right. That movie is like a graveyard of thespians propping up a mediocre television actor.

I liked his relationship with Vers aa a mentor, in the sense that it's clear that he actually believed in what he was trying to teach her and it wasn't just part of an evil scheme

I realized yesterday the movie put the two of them in contrast with the relationship between Fury and Coulson. After the latter spared the former Nick tells Carol how proud he was that Coulson disobeyed orders to follow his instincts and trust, which is literally the opposite of what Yon-rogg tries to teach Vers earlier in the movie when he calls impulses and emotions a distractions. And what's also ironic is that while she's following her own judgement by the end Carol still kinda incorporated those lessons. During the training Yon-rogg specifically says "your rage only helps your enemy", and when in the end he challenges Carol she's not angry, she doesn't kill him despite all the betrayals and manipulation, she's clear-headed just gets the job done kicking him back to Hala, she ends up incorporating the best of both worlds we could say. Her offering an hand is really what sold the scene to me