Why does the mcu ignore this movie?

why does the mcu ignore this movie?

Attached: hulk milkies.jpg (1330x1000, 240K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/WNm7R8Ws4Yk
youtu.be/ojni15tBlBA
youtube.com/watch?v=taLO2yKqxRg
youtube.com/watch?v=1oiG8KmKpqo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Too good, makes the rest of the MCU look incompetent

Because Hulk distribution rights are owned by Universal Studios, thus preventing them from making any money off any future Hulk solos. That's why Banner is regulated as a supporting character. They mention it offhand, but prefer to move on because of this fact and because Ed Nortion was originally Bruce Banner.

Attached: Hulk.jpg (1420x1500, 620K)

Because its actually good. Cant have that.

what's the real reason

See

Because they don’t own 100% of the Hulk rights, so a direct sequel wouldn’t make them as much money as just using Hulk elsewhere.

1) Because of what said, basically nothing about the Hulk movie is relevant to the current MCU. Remember that Leader tease? I guess he just died or something.
2) It's possibly the worst MCU film, because the action is pointless. Hulk just gets stronger than Tim Roth and beats him that's all there is to it.

Leader and Abomination were in SHIELD custody, but who knows what happened after that

what movie?

>Hulk just gets stronger than Tim Roth and beats him that's all there is to it.
Yeah that’s sort of how Hulk works.

Sure, and that's why his movies suck. There's no trick or question to beating the enemy, since Hulk can't die and only gets stronger as they fight.

>Ross eventually came back
>Movies like Avengers occasionally point at Harlem as the first public Hulk outing
>Just like the end of the movie implied Bruce is able to control Hulk
>They even referenced the deleted scene where Bruce tries to shoot himself but Hulk prevents him from dying

What's left to do? It's true the movie set up villains and Betty, but things just change overtime, like how Jane Foster is suddenly gone

The 2000s movie was smart tho, the final fight wasn't about Hulk throwing stronger punches

What the fuck are you talking about? The main thrust of the story was a Hulk version of Beauty and the Beast and Bruce having to comes to terms with the monster inside of him
>superhero stories only matter because of the bad guy
I'm not replying to you any more

Cause its awful and the only good thing about it is William Hurt.

look at this contrarian fag and laugh

>superhero wins in the end
You don’t say!

How does it feel to be the only person who remembers the Hulk movie's plot?

I hope Abomination comes back at some point, and not as a villain.

I-I remember it too. At the time it was the only MCU movie i wanted to see in theaters

Attached: 1466883567944.png (275x293, 5K)

1. Universal literally owns the rights to Hulk solo films, making this something Disney doesn't even want to deal with, which is the actual reason Banner's arc between AoU, TR and IW occurred instead of say a straight Planet Hulk adaptation
2. This movie wasn't particularly liked in part because of weak directing, zak penn's shitty script (thank god marvel stopped hiring him), norton going full primadonna like he always does and marvel editing out major portions to avoid it being too similar to Ang Lee's movie
3. Norton, obviously, was replaced by Ruffalo. This really muddies everything when the lead is a completely different person and they don't even approach the character in the same way.
4. Nothing really important happens in this movie. Don't pretend you care about Bruce and Betty hooking up or Tim Roth was great because he did a few flips before Hulk kicked him into a hospital.
5. Look at the budget versus box office. This probably broke even at absolute best which is the ultimate measure of interest.

Like, yeah, it would be cool to see Abomination fight the Hulk again, especially if they did Masters of Evil or even Thunderbolts, but that's about it. No one is dying to see Tim Blake Nelson's campy Leader.

Attached: I'm Very Dissapointed In All Of You.jpg (483x464, 41K)

Doesn't Ross coming back count for anything?
They were able to convince his original actor to come back too, unlike Red Skull.

>norton going full primadonna
The funniest thing about that was him forcing them to write in a whole side character just so he could get a guy from The Wire to do it since he liked the show, and it ended up getting cut from the actual movie.

That's because Hugo Weaving is weird.

This. It’s a legitimately good superhero movie that is faithful to its source material and doesn’t kill its tension with babbling “talk until a joke falls out” humor.

Therefore the MCU can’t acknowledge it.

>It’s possible the worst MCU film.
>Iron Man 2, Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Thor 3, Age of Ultron, Infinity War, GOTG2, Doctor Strange, Antman 1, Antman 2, and Captain Marvel exist

Feige pls

Forgot
>Civil War

I never understand him. He’ll agree to things, openly shit on them, and then rinse and repeat.

Thunderbolt Ross is in the MCU. They still showed footage of hulks fight from the movie. Tony contacts hulk about starting the avengers.

I really wish they would re-use Abomination, and would actually use Leader.

Leader should be played by Jeffrey Combs, though.

Because Hulk's a men's rights poster boy and Bruce Banner would be called an incel if he was properly portrayed in a film. Go find Steve Buscemi in The Ultimates to understand why.

Banner has had a ton of beav over the years.
You're that guy that shits his pants on every Hulk thread, aren't ye?

Why ain't there no (You) on there, friendo? Are you a leet hacker or something.

Hey, Doctor Strange was good.

Most people who have seen it could recall the main point of the story.

Abomination should get dissected by Oscorp to make Ultimate Goblin, fire, tail and flying platform. You know, like a Hulk Vulture mash up. Maybe switch things up for Spideys third film to be about something other that stolen chitari tech.

No, no it wasn’t

That's actually not bad

Because Comcast.

They don't. thunderbolt ross is still around and chipper as always.

Had to wait for a full audience before stomping Serp.

There will be She Hulk

Bendis's 20 year old idea.

It doesn’t, it just isn’t the most relevant movie, and like the second response said, there are legal reasons preventing them from making a movie that’s just about Bruce Banner and his imaginary friend, or whatever the Hulk persona is in this version, and they not only changed him to Ruffalo, but also kept changing his Hulk design, but they also did that with other characters, like changing War Machine from Terrance Howard to Don Cheadle, which makes his line near the end of the first Iron Man about “next time” either a lot sadder or a lot funnier.

>Hulk fans love it to death
>no one else gets it
Such is the life of the lonely men

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 11K)

So what's the consensus on Hulk (2003)?

>It's possibly the worst MCU film
not while Thord the dark world exists
>the final fight wasn't about Hulk throwing stronger punches
Maybe it was but we just couldn't see it.

It was a bold move to make the Hulk into an art house film, I loved it even if it didn't quite work

because of that webm

I've seen the movie twice. It's pretty good albeit one of the weakest MCU movie.

I'm one of the few people who liked it better. It also aged better than Incredible.

How does it feel to have such shit taste?

I wouldn’t know.

Except Hulk was getting his shit kicked in until he saw Betty in trouble, moron. The movie did the opposite of your claim. It made Hulk vulnerable, which made his win much cooler.

>That moment where he’s staggering, trying to figure out what the hell just hit him

there is no consensus.
For me every good idea is immediately followed up by two retarded ones

It’s two hours of a director smelling his own farts.

Because it makes the new ones look bad. Just compare these two clips.

youtu.be/WNm7R8Ws4Yk
youtu.be/ojni15tBlBA

Can’t forget this scene.

youtube.com/watch?v=taLO2yKqxRg

Not enough quips and the fact that the Hulk in the film was actually decently depicted compared to his MCU counter part. The movie actually took the concept of pre-control Bruce's being forced to deal with the Hulk and all of the side effects (AIDS carrier tier concern about blood contamination , pulse monitoring, etc. ) there in seriously rather than playing it off as humorous every ten seconds which is a big no no with the MCU. They also stuck to the idea that the Hulk really just wants people to leave him the fuck alone and isn't particularly shy about killing someone to see to that rather than just a big lunk that wants to hit things all day. Can't really make a kid friendly hero out of the guy that tries bisecting a man with a jagged chunk of metal.

this post reek of being born 00 and later

okay but Ultimate Hulk is ~literally~ hilarious
-Wants to beat up Freddy Prinze Jr because Betty got him for the rebound
-Talks about how Thor beating him up gets his dick hard
-Extremely homophobic and has issues with his own masculinity; all you need to do to convince him to attack /anything/ is say that they implied he is a gay/a sissy

Fpbp

The real reason? Because it was a fucking flop man

>eats people just for the hell of it
>has a harem
>offers Logan cocoa

No spoilers please, I'm not that far yet.
>offers Logan cocoa
That is legitimately adorable.

It's in Ultimate Wolverine vs Hulk, takes place roughly between Ultimates 2 #6 and #7

Attached: UHVW.png (677x1028, 1.41M)

cuz its bad

Attached: 5hukj.png (1098x581, 457K)

>third TIH thread in a week
What gives?

>norton going full primadonna
That was lie made by Disney so they can fool idiots like you. Norton did nothing wrong and is actually good actor unlike any one in MCU.

It's perfect.
youtube.com/watch?v=1oiG8KmKpqo

Attached: 1548403180041.png (388x483, 220K)

A score to match Danny Elfman's work in Spider-Man