LOL

Given the mods removed it yesterday it very much is against rules
Based mods taking out the trash

Pretty sure you can use dollars as fuel in a coal plant with minimal modifications

Get ready for your version soon stoney

Attached: 1483720525514.png (500x341, 168K)

I love how batshit insane she is

Attached: 1313684588753.jpg (374x250, 16K)

Post waifus instead

Attached: bc9e636b146d1857b73e455295052de3.jpg (500x659, 41K)

>mods giving a shit about the rules

>blatantly stealing jokes from Fairly Oddparents

Attached: 1551450418265.gif (460x347, 461K)

Best Disney waifu comin through

Attached: tangled_06_by_mihzu-d3b6nvr.jpg (900x678, 151K)

I-is he really against renewable energy? Then again, he was one of those deluded "bitcoin" guy.
We have limited amounts of coal and oil, someday we have to utilize other energy sources. I have my doubts about the efficency of solar and wind power but if Fusion doesn't work out, they are the only energy sources left. I have hopes that Fusion works out because there is a lot of progress made in stabilizing it.

Based

>left-leaning political webcomic
>I sleep

>right-leaning political webcomic
>OFF TOPIC OFF TOPIC REEEEEEEEEEEE

The problem of green energies is that nuclear plants are way greener than coal(sure waste and emissions are still a problem but not as big as coal ones) and yet no one fucking builds them.
Other like solar and wind aren't exactly as efficient as they should be to actually replace coal and nuclear

>The problem of green energies is that nuclear plants are way greener than coal(sure waste and emissions are still a problem but not as big as coal ones) and yet no one fucking builds them.
Nuclear also shares the problem with coal and oil of limited resources. Uran and other radiocative material only exist in a quantity that we won't be able to power civilization alone on them for the next century or two.

wew what fucking year did this come from?

>stonetoss sunlight is more expensive than coal

Attached: 1489987599336.jpg (898x701, 153K)

The problem of nuclear power is how long the shit is dangerous for and how risky it is if anything goes wrong.
Right now the time to build nuclear reactors is probably through.
Nobody will want a nuclear reactor in their area, or a nuclear dump, so it will be very hard to get built.
Should have happened decades ago.
Right now it will be much easier to up renewables and see where that gets you.
The problem of the USA is the crumbling infrastructure not being able to support solar and wind input effectively.
So it will take a major effort just to get to the point where you can get your solar generation at home into the grid without problems.
Not that the investment isn't needed regardless.

Attached: r l.jpg (875x520, 39K)

Adult Mission is looking delicious

Greens and Dems are generally against nuclear power. We're in this bizarre world, where Germany, a land of great quality control engineers, and little sunshine, shut all of their nuclear plants in favor of expensive solar; while they are supporting nuclear power for Iran (land of oil, sunshine, and comparatively shitty quality control engineers). It's totally upside-down.

For many Greens, solar and wind is an obsession, not a practical, or thought out plan; and they're aggressively ignorant to the human cost of the devastating economic effects of rapidly switching away from oil/gas/coal. There are some very sunny areas, and a few very windy areas where solar and wind power are practical, as a supplement to more reliable power sources. Texas put in a lot of solar, without government mandate or subsidy. That doesn't mean they are going to stop producing/consuming oil.

People most concerned about carbon also tend to oppose fracking. If they're paying any attention, they'd know that the byproduct produced by it (natural gas), has made the US one of the most rapidly de-carbonizing major countries as coal is replaced by gas. But they don't care about what actually benefits humans in the short and long term (i.e. they don't care about destroying the global economy, causing a drastic decrease in the quality of living in developed countries, and mass starvation in countries that rely on first world affluence).

LOL

Attached: not gay.png (340x244, 25K)

I took time but i'm used to his style now, i'm also sure Stone come here and post those itself half of the time.

Man, murdering an unborn child really does turn a woman into an empty soulless husk doesn't it?

Not to mention Wind turbines and Dams create OTHER ecological disasters of their own, and then you are back to fucking square one again.

Solar panel roads will pave the way to the future

Attached: 1528777096662.jpg (1200x630, 156K)

Attached: ZenPencils_AverageMan.jpg (980x4016, 952K)

literally fucking me

fuck

Average is not a bad thing, what about kids or a wife?

Reads kinda like a gibe against government-picked winners. Which is fair.
What you actually want is a price on co2 emissions and let the market find the cheapest solution, not gov spending taxpayer money on something that may not be best pick regards efficiency.

Hilariously that's what the supposed "fiscally responsible" party down under is doing tho. But then it's always been obvious they're doing it at the behest of coal industry. Essentially.

Why does StoneToss piss libs off so much?

Attached: 54215252524.jpg (1080x1043, 176K)

Mate the economic studies have been done. Not mitigating ASAP will lead to ever greater adaptation costs down the road. Total cost goes up longer we stand around dicking off.

And yes, there is awareness that you don't want an abrupt step change; that would have the problems you raise associated.
But the first step needs to be made - and the first step is a price on co2 emissions. My pick is cap&trade scheme on that.
Give the signal, and let the market deliver cheapest mitigation.

>wind turbines cause ecological disasters
U fukkin what m8?
And don't say "birds" Fuck the birds. Deer of the skies.

>turn a woman into an empty soulless husk
>turn

user, I'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you...

why the fuck does stonetoss' art style piss me off so much

Because political webcomics are dominated by leftists and they can't stand differing opinions.

What was so bad about this guy's life? Made his parents proud, had a pretty easy job for life apparently, enjoyed some luxuries, had easy credit, and was appreciated by his bosses and colleagues.

Because it's bad, the guy can't get eyes right and its the right alternative to Assigned Male.

Attached: leftright.jpg (1000x500, 88K)

>5. go overseas once or twice in your life, always to somewere safe and easy
as opposed to dangerous and hard to enjoy yourself? fuck out of here with that bullshit

It kind of is actually if you want to produce as much energy as coal can you would have to construct an enormous amount of infastructure by comparison

Because they all make the same exact face 90% of the time and have bloated lips.

BS. Unless you're calling the plants themselves "infrastructure".

>nuclear power is dangerous
Its not inherently dangerous, it's just very unforgiving of mistakes, which don't happen frequently because it's an extremely regulated industry. You can probably name every major nuclear incident in history because there's only been like three of them, and Fukushima wasn't even due to human error.

Even then, Fukishima only resulted in 1 death.

Idk putting your plant on the shoreline when your country's known for its tidal waves seems a very human error to me.

Solar panels and solar have to be built and in order for them to produce the same level of energy currently being produced by coal you have to build A LOT of them.

O make them more efficient. Hell, just put them in a desert. You'll get more power for less materials. Or perhaps do you think coal gave us 200% of its potential from the get go? It still hasn't do 90%, but coal's 90% power is nowhere near that of the sun desu.

That's fair, the point is the meltdown wasn't caused by someone in the plant not doing their job