What you need to know about Milo Murphy's Law

I wish for more Cavendish and Dakota.

Attached: Cavendish and Dakota29.jpg (1920x1080, 275K)

There's plenty of that in Season 2

At least Wile E has a goal in mind. Milo just seems mindless and gets dragged by Murphy's Law.

Maybe they should expand the cast a little?

They have Doofenshmirtz.

Attached: IMG_pkt6gt.jpg (1079x425, 88K)

a certain Drusselsteinian and a platypus could help

Imagine Melissa as a Fireside Girl.

Attached: 1551374196600.jpg (662x285, 47K)

I'd respect it a lot more if they had the guts to let the show stand by itself. But, no, they HAD to make it Phineas and Ferb 2.

I hate this and P&F's horrible bland art style

They should do a Doof 101 show already.

I want more of this guy.

Attached: IMG_l1wej5.jpg (293x247, 23K)

Attached: Screen_Shot_2018-10-25_at_11.53.37_PM.png (380x341, 192K)

The Fireside Girls were an important part of Phineas and Ferb, and seeing how Candace and Melissa already know each other, it's not implausible Candace would invite her.
If 15 year old Candace can join, so can 13 year old Melissa.

Attached: download_20180913_213608~2.jpg (702x683, 69K)

Anyone else feel like there's something "off" about the show on a structural level? It feels like the show focuses on a joke for just a few seconds too long until it's not funny anymore. It's like they realize that they don't have enough jokes so they just pad out the individual ones until they lose their flavor.

There's also something off about the composition when it comes to the physical comedy but it's hard for me to put into words.

For me, it's the way they handle story arcs. They just don't flow well as most of the episodes don't serve anything to them.

A good sign that they're handling them poorly is how they have an episode with negative continuity.

They could try using some of the classmates like Mort or Bradley I guess.
It would have been better if they kept the PnF characters for the crossover and maybe little cameos. The show and it's characters should be able to stand on it's own instead of borrowing from another show.

Attached: 1549216811028.jpg (1920x1080, 171K)

Given their dislike of Milo Bradley and Elliot seem really underused.

Attached: Bradley02.jpg (1920x1080, 94K)

You're not wrong.

>Anything that can go wrong near him will

How the fuck is he not dead or at least in the hospital?

Attached: descartes.jpg (480x360, 9K)

Going to the hospital will just kill others.

Attached: photos.jpg (1920x1080, 727K)

No

Attached: photos02.jpg (1920x1080, 764K)

>external bad luck is hereditary

You worry me, you have to overcome this character.

Not all episodes have anything to do with any of the arcs. Episodes like The Math Book or Cast Party is just having a good time with these characters and that's fine.

Elliot has episodes, but Pace Makes Waste seem more like a setback for the character.

Bradley is really underused.

They have a Murphy wing in the hospital.
Maybe Milo and his Dad subconsciously regulate the law so that it doesn´t kill.

>Going to the hospital will just kill others
I meant for leukemia or being in a coma or something like that.

Attached: 1527604424186.jpg (1920x1080, 678K)

"Come on, Zack. Inside me."

If they serve nothing to the the story arc, might as well throw them away, in my opinion.

Even if the episode wants them to have fun, it should at least contribute something to the arc, no matter how small. JJBA Diamond is Unbreakable is a good example of this.

With MML it just seems inconsistent on whether it wants to stick to the arc or not, which is arguably the main reason I stopped watching.

Milo Murphy's Law got 333K views last week.

Attached: images (5).jpg (739x415, 27K)

They're a couple, right?

Not explicitly. Some of the crew ship them, though.

Sure why not.

Attached: Melissa and Zack02.jpg (1920x1080, 639K)

This shit looks like the Six for the Six campaign

Attached: 1543155439315.jpg (566x960, 108K)

>It needs your help
Disney, you refused to air it for about 18 months, while other countries got it, in English.

Attached: tumblr_ow2350DmqZ1rdlfnuo4_540.png (540x389, 101K)

Attached: trust me the'll be gone before mom gets home.jpg (1920x1080, 132K)

>Wonder when MY neck will get that long

Attached: Candace's neck.jpg (1920x1080, 181K)

I have no problem with it that way. I do not need to see a pistachio plant or an alien ship in the background to remember if the series has any story arc or not.
Obviously there are episodes where nothing happens, like that where Diogee is an agent and "faces" Doof, those are boring.

They sure act as one. Officially? It's anyone's guess.

I sure do. Then again, we have different priorities in what to look for in the show. Based on interviews, I got the impression that the episodes and its details would build up to an impressive story. Unfortunately, in my honest opinion, it didn't turn out that way. Or at least they attempted to do it but what they ended up with was a story arc that didn't flow well.

>I do not need to see a pistachio plant or an alien ship in the background to remember if the series has any story arc or not.
It doesn't need to be that way, but I would personally like the events in the episodes to mean something in the future. They did it pretty well for The Llama Incident, but not so much for seasonal arcs.

>Based on interviews, I got the impression that the episodes and its details would build up to an impressive story.
Then the disappointment can come from external information to the show. That's why we should always have neutral expectations, so we avoid being blinded by ideas or false plots that we create ourselves.

>I would personally like the events in the episodes to mean something in the future
Some things do, obviously not all with the main story arcs. I think it's good to see the characters do things and get to know them in things not related to arcs. Otherwise they would look like robots doing things "only because of the plot, the plot and the plot."

>That's why we should always have neutral expectations.
If that were the case, trailers and promotional interviews shouldn't exist. Though not gonna lie, I'd usually avoid promotional material nowadays and the only things worth looking at are sneak peeks.

Anyway, I think if I hadn't heard the promos, I wouldn't be as disappointed but I would still find something wrong with it. My problem with it would be that a serious plot is jumping around with no warning.

>I think it's good to see the characters do things and get to know them in things not related to arcs. Otherwise they would look like robots doing things "only because of the plot, the plot and the plot."
Characters and relationships can develop while still being relevant to the plot.

Milo is OP as fuck if you think about it.

No fuck you, I'm ending this show myself.

Some of you guys are alright.

Don't come to the writer's room tomorrow.

Attached: 1551696532662.jpg (576x768, 159K)

Candace all grown up

>If that were the case, trailers and promotional interviews shouldn't exist.
Those exist to give knowledge of what is coming And as I say, we should remain neutral to those things.

>Characters and relationships can develop while still being relevant to the plot.
True, they can but it is not an obligation and this is not exclusive to MML.

I recommend you see the "Half-Arc Season" or "Season Fluidity" pages of TV Tropes.

yeah if he was in infinity war thanos would do the snap and thanos would be the only one to disappear.

>Those exist to give knowledge of what is coming
And also to provide hype to the potential audience, telling them what to expect. That's marketing 101.

>True, they can but it is not an obligation
And I'm not obliged to like it. By arguing against my personal preferences, you're implying that I'm obliged to.

>"Half-Arc Season"
One of the examples is Gravity Falls, and I was expecting MML's episodes to be that, the kind where tiny details lead to a larger story.

>"Season Fluidity"
The problem I have here is that some of the episodes fall under Fluid (like Game Night) while others fall under Dammed (like The Substitute) or even Abrupt (like Abducting Murphy's Law).

What I'm saying is that it feels as if the show can't decide on what sort of series it wants to be, Fluid, Dammed, or Abrupt, and that's what I don't like. You can be fine with this, but I'm not.

>give knowledge of what is coming
>we should remain neutral

"Neutral expectations" usually applies in a context where expectations are high or low on the quality of the media the promotions are advertising, not the context of the media. When you have neutral expectations, you just don't know whether what you're consuming is good or bad. When you're given knowledge of what's going to come by promotional material, it's almost impossible to have a neutral (or you way call it zero) expectations. That'd be the equivalent of someone walking into a theater and choosing a random movie to watch (though even the poster and title can give certain expectations).

*not the content of the media

>When you're given knowledge of what's going to come by promotional material, it's almost impossible to have a neutral (or you may call it zero) expectations.

By this I'm saying that it's impossible to have no expectation to what content the media will have. I'm giving this argument because you used the "we should have neutral expectations" argument against my statement that's basically "I expected a, but I got b and I don't like it" instead of "I expected something good, but I got something bad", which is different because you can dislike something that's not necessarily bad.

Fuck that, I want the Doof teaching highschool spinoff

>The problem I have here is that some of the episodes fall under completely fluid (like Game Night) while others fall in the middle (like The Substitute) or even highly abrupt (like Abducting Murphy's Law).
OK, I fixed it. But you get the point that I don't like how the show couldn't firmly decide on how to deal with the seasonal arcs

I think that's what Buford said in the Phineas and Ferb effect.

I thought that was an opinion.

Morbid.

Baljeet was also flirting with her when he heard she had studied Murphy's Law extensively.
After he apologized to Zack, he claimed "WE'RE NOT A COUPLE!"

They were on a Nazi blimp?

Is that good?

It's lower than the last two weeks.

A show with a reformed Doof interacting with teenagers that is largely set in a school environment and a minimum or less of Perry the Platypus is what we got though.

At this point, Doof 101 was less of a pilot for its own show and more a proof of concept pilot for Milo Murphy's Law that showed Disney that they could do a show aimed at an older group of children.

That does not answer the question.

Refer to The recent numbers increased the chances of the show getting canceled. It can be either good or bad, depending on who you ask.

February 8th ratings:
>Milo Murphy's Law, Saturday 7AM, 319K
>Pat the Dog, Sunday 6:30 AM, 327K

Looks gay and lame.

For a moment I thought it was some sort of troll post. I mean, "Milo needs your help"? I expected this to encourage kids to give up their parents' credit card info like in that one meme.
youtube.com/watch?v=5P-Yk-Q2bWk

We have a KND version as well, IIRC.

I thought Doof 101 would have had perry pose as a student to keep an eye on Doof or something though?

That would be cool.