This 2 channels are literally the same channel

Also, the black1sout

Why do people even call them animators when their """animations""" have less frames of animations and poses than even fucking Seth MacFarlane's works?

Except circletoons is funnier.

The sad part is that Neros Q came back from the dead and has better animation.

I mean, he has near objectively worse views, but better animation.

Fucking this

Seeing as one has 20x more subs than the other, seems like people dont allow this. Why the fuck do you care?

To be fair, swoozie was doing way before odd1sout came along

Did you miss the part where Odd1sout was labeled as "white swoozie"

>better animation
Fuck off Neros. Tweening is the most laziest form of animation.

Stupid kids under the age of 17 and normies. There's your answer.

Is swoozie our guy?

>Why people allow this?
I'm sorry but I don't have the energy or enough bullets to find and evacuate them from life.

>white swoozie
amazin

Attached: hardudder.png (270x270, 77K)

I've always figured it's this . The kids are probably attracted to the simple style that are easier to draw.

Still better than ' youtube critics' who uses cartoon avatar that has loke 5 diffrent poses

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 81K)

the only one I can defend is blue shirt odd1sout cause he actually does stuff. He has a busk/stunt act he does and its mildly impressive. At least good enough to be flown down to NZ from his home in the states.

thats the average American/Anglo quality. what are you talking about

It's good if you're trying to upload videos with any consistency (which he doesn't)

i like a lot of these better than odd1sout desu

There is also a littlecommunity of DnD dedicated odd1out clones

The same reason you're allowed to exist even though you're a disgusting ESL and should be gassed.

The fact that everyone but Jaiden looks the same - and Jaiden is only different because of the hair - makes me think about how Youtube just keep promoting content with no real value outside the context of their walled garden.

Consider all their talentless vloggers who don't know anything and have no skills. They can't sing, dance, or paint. In spite of "reviewing" media, they don't know how to make a film or a show, and they don't know anything about writing structure. These people can't do fucking anything, and when Youtube tried to use them in their Youtube Red Originals, it was just a higher budget for low quality.

But though the Storytimers are better because MAYBE some of them might be artists who being simply underutilized, these white blobs all look exactly the same. Imagine if these guys released toys or something. How do parents know they're buying the correct white blob? And could you even copyright an image as simple as that? Could anyone say it's legally distinct in the first place? If Storytimers ever reached the same audience cable shows used to, bootlegging them would be easy, and indeed it's why so many Storytimers exist now, because the white blob is so easy.

Letting underages use the internet was a mistake.

Honestly he reminds me of myself when I was 16. An annoying cunt