So apparently the MPAA FORCED Marvel to remove Stark's alcoholic behavior in End Game to keep the PG-13 rating

So apparently the MPAA FORCED Marvel to remove Stark's alcoholic behavior in End Game to keep the PG-13 rating.

Welcome to Obama's Republic of Hitlerstan.

Attached: 1551387520388[1].jpg (1723x2500, 3.24M)

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt0332452/parentalguide
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Can't believe this is happening.

No shit Stark’s alcoholism was censored. In other ancient news, RDJ badly wanted to do Demon In a Bottle plotline, but the closest they got to it was his red flag/dying behaviour in IM2 because they didn’t want to have alcholism in the movie.

I always liked Stark and Warbird dealing with their alcoholism as a plotline, though. Shame Carol entered the MCU so late.

Attached: 871F4FCA-2168-4ED2-9E93-3D563F3D1D21.png (500x465, 364K)

I missed you

RDJ has no say in the iron man films because they're owned by marvel and warner brothers.

I really appreciate you guys making the exact same threads every day. It really helps me work on my retorts without having them lost in the depths of a 200+ replies thread.

He does in that they have to give him 50 mill to show up and waggle his eyebrows. They probably take some input.

Please keep trolling outside of Yea Forums, thanks.

Uhh end game isn't even released yet.

They just pay him because they're forced to. If they could get away with keep him quiet and paying him a regular actor salary they would.

Thats why they want to kill him in endgame

Please don't brigade the report function, it'll just ruin things for everyone.

>RDJ has no say in the iron man films because they're owned by marvel and warner brothers.
>owned by marvel and warner brothers.
>marvel and warner brothers.
>warner brothers.

Attached: EF71374E-52EC-4EE3-9A88-5D2FDD06A80A.png (211x244, 72K)

>50mil

Lol he gets like 300k per movie because disney is cheap as fuck.

Is this Tommy's new thing? Did he get tired of making Doom threads?

I... what?

It's almost like Marvel wants children to watch their movies, weird.

And?
It wouldn't been seen by kids, which means "mommy mommy take me to get an obese meal um happy meal with the free toy and then buy me more marvel toys thank you mommy!"

That's the reason why - it's not that they care about alcoholism but that they care about not advertising to kids

>casuals falling for an old meme

WB has had a big steak in Marvel ever since they bought out DC.

Why does alcohol = not for kids? Kids will eventually need to learn about it, grow some balls marvel

Kids think anything adults do is cool, so having drinking in the movie would just attract more kids and make more money.

Yeah but mcdonalds, burger king, toy companies etc won't sell shit like that

They could make way more on online sales than burger king sales, They're just retarded.

This nigga serious?

>ITT: NEWFAGS

>2019
>using reddit terms like newfag on Yea Forums

jesus

Mcdonalds sold toys about murders before man I don't think they care.

Bruh toy companies are progressive now haven't you seen all the naked anime girls and warhammer toys for kids?

I guess most people haven't been in touch with the mainstream for a while now.

Where would he even find booze in space? It's a little late in the game to bring alcoholism, if this is the last movie.

Why wouldn't the guardians have a bunch of booze in their ship? They're actual space pirates.

Pretty sure their equipment is mostly powered through alcohol, at least in the comics.

Trolling in Yea Forums is a bannable offense.

You need alcoholism to feel all grown up watching superhero movies?

worst part is the hypocrisy

Alcoholism has nothing to do with age. It's a problem with all ages and ethnicities.

Still, you can't show alcoholism with one bender during a space journey that will almost definitely be his last.

Could just be nothing but alcoholism, then when he is about to reach earth he runs out of fuel because he drank it all. It would be epic

>alcohol
>grown up

lol wut

Alcoholism killing a hero would be a fantastic sendoff.

You want him to quip about his journey home after everyone else was murdered?

I seriously doubt they'll kill any of the Avengers in this,

They've been trying to dump RDJ for years since they have to pay him a percentage of the gross profit, so they end up paying him like 50M or more every movie. There's no way he survives end game.

They weren't murdered just snapped out. Pretty humane when you think about it.

Isn't it already confirmed that Chris Evans isn't coming back? They basically have to kill him.

...

They really don't have to kill the characters. They'll just have them ride into the sunset and never show up again. Or recast them. Avengers movies are for kids primarily, they're not gonna conclude them with the main cast dying.

I mean they already avoided regular "death" by snapping them to death so I don't see why they won't just do something similar. They also just had Thanos toss gamora off a cliff.

Trolling in Yea Forums is a bannable offense.

Gamora is a nobody. I mean, I liked her in her movies but she's supporting cast; those are all expendable. But the heroes from the first Avengers movie are untouchable, I'd say.

Already confirmed by the directors that people will be getting gruesome deaths.

Yeah. Villains, probably.

why is no one else talking about this? This is censorship of art plain and simple.

Most people on Yea Forums are afraid of real world issues it seems.

You can't seriously believe that the MPAA can strongarm Disney, anons. And it's not like they have to, because they censor themselves plenty and make sure their movies are kiddie appropriate.

MCU films are made for teens and adults. That's the point of the PG-13 rating. If you want something for children, there's more appropriate choices. Treating alcoholism as an R-rating only subject matter is a misuse of the rating system which only serves to coddle the audience.

Considering the power MPAA wields it wouldn't surprise me if they could demand anything they want from disney.

Disney has made films like pulp fiction bro you don't know what you're talking about.

i concur

>Pulp Fiction
>Production companies: A Band Apart
Jersey Films

Sure thing, bro. Also, It's totally the same. Superheroes are mature and Marvel Studios movies have had adult, controversial issues like... Uhh... That one. Yeah. You know.

You must be living under a rock because marvel films have grown out of being kids films for a decade now.

Your development is so stunted that you believe MCU flicks touch upon adult issues. I really pity you. What parts did you think were "not for kids"? Give a few examples, so I can have a laugh.

Bruh this is some reddit level shitposting lol

Not an argument. What a surprise. You're hilarious.

I know right? What an asshole

Yeah people like that making it so blatant and so low effort... don't know what goes through their heads.

hahah tru what a twat

>RDJ has no say
and yet people love to blame him as the number 1 reason for why something they dont like happens even when it makes inconceivably no sense

Well he does have leverage. If he didn't renew his contract before they killed/replaced him there would be a massive PR shitstorm. It's his decision to take money over creative control.

The only creative control RDJ has is the Russos having him sit down every so often to discuss how his character's development plays out and if he has any input. He doesn't have control over absolutely everything like a lot of anons love to think.

>Well he does have leverage
yeah and he's used that leverage to get his co-stars better pay cheques while taking a percentage out of his own to make it happen

That's what leverage is for ya dingus

Tell that to edward norton and terrance howard, got a big fat $0

I dont know shit about norton's situation but howard was being a big bag of dicks throughout and is genuinely insane plus that was before rdj started making big bucks and the mcu became as large as it did. he wasnt in the same position he is now that he could easily hold something over their heads.

They cut howard's pay dramatically. Of course he'd be bitter about it.

RDJ admitted himself that he could've had creative control but instead wanted more money. Sold out the universe for a bigger paycheck for him and his cronies.

>Considering the power MPAA wields it wouldn't surprise me if they could demand anything they want from disney.
Considering the power the CCA wirlds it wouldn't surprise me if they could demand anything they want from Marvel.

Wow, what a dick

English motherfucker do you speak it?

could've replaced it with dazed behavior from drinking fucked up root beer.

lol this had me rollin

rofl

okay, this is epic.

Change the r to an e. I fat fingered it. Fuck's sake I was parroting the quoted text.

Attached: fuck up.png (237x345, 29K)

LOL!

Now you'll never live it down.

What manga is that image from?

Moron. There is no alcoholic behavior because DISNEY doesn't allow it. It's not the MPAA.

Uhh Disney won't allow it because the MPAA won't allow it. That's the whole point.

Looks like homestuck

MPAA has more regulatory power than the Disney.

This is why we need netflix. With netflix this problem no longer exists.

>[citations needed]
>Iron Man 3 was 7 years ago

What does iron man 3 have to do with this?

It looks absolutely nothing like homestuck.

So Tony's final scene before he dies won't be some kind of bookend to the opening of Iron Man 1 where he's sitting in some kind of vehicle and pounding back some kind of alcoholic drink?

This movie can go fuck itself then.

Attached: Tony.png (1351x573, 598K)

Looks like the homestuck style imo, which is varied and not unique.

Considering the path they've chosen for movies after IM1 it seems like they're trying as hard as possible to forget IM1 even existed.

No, it doesn't. Homestuck has a few artstyles but none of them look like that at all. Homestuck characters aren't drawn with black outlines, for example. Or ears, or noses.

I don't know what to tell you but it's 100% homestuck style.

I know what to tell you, you are wrong.

t. Read homestuck since the beginning and at no point has it ever been drawn like that. Here's what most Homestuck panels look like. Flat colours with no outlines. The second most common panel style is the sprite comic format, where characters have black outlines but are super-deformed with giant heads and no arms.

Attached: 05291[1].gif (650x450, 9K)

Who cares? I wont be seeing any new Disney movies ever again after their Star Wars and Captain Marvel shenanigans.

>posting outdated webcomic images instead of the full renders

You being serious right now? Trolling isn't allowed in Yea Forums.

?? Disney's star wars sequels have been pretty great, haven't hjeard anything bad about captain marvel.

(you)

Excuse me?

????

Are you dense? Are you fucking stupid or something?

Can someone explain this post to me?

Anybody have the screencap that applied this meme to Casablanca?

Uhhh Casablanca hasn't been in theaters for like decades.

What the fuck are you talking about? Homestuck is a webcomic, there are no "full renders" different from this. There's a print version, but it's 1:1 exactly identical to the webcomic.

Just stop being retarded and accept you were wrong.

I get the feeling that these are samefags trying to get a reaction.

Are you dense? Are you fucking stupid or something?

Homestuck hasn't been webcomic exclusive for years now bro what the hell are you smoking?

Well, they could have gone movie R rated, it's not like it stopped people from going to see Deadpool and it would not stop people from seeing this movie either. This isn't really censorship, just over-sensitivity to alcoholism.

R rating bans kids from seeing it so it is defacto censorship.

No it doesn't it just means you have to beg somebody over 17 to see it. If it was NC-17 then yeah, that would be censorship.

This thread again? There isn't even a source, don't fall for the bait, people

They have revival screenings sometimes.

But it also replaced Obama with Roosevelt I think.

Name one (1) movie that got an R rating just because of depiction of onscreen drinking.

What?

Attached: 1522841265792s.jpg (125x125, 2K)

It's a good movie. I'd put it in my top 3 list with finding nemo and the god father.

Deadpool.

Homestuck has never been anything other than a webcomic, and it has never, ever had that artstyle. You are fucking retarded.

Homestuck has had rendered drawings now for over 5 years get out of your parent's basement.

Theres so much wrong with what you just said I'm not sure I can unpack it all.

>strong bloody violence, pervasive language, disturbing images, alcohol use, and crude sexual content and graphic nudity.
Looks like a bit more than just the alcohol. In fact, if you were to take out the drinking scenes entirely, the nipples in the strip club scene alone would have gotten it an automatic R, because the MPAA are a bunch of prudes.

Other than the image the rest of the post is pretty accurate imho.

says right there alcohol use bro you just played yourself.

Really? That's your take out of all of whats happening recently?

It's not. R ratings are generally for boobs and really graphic violence. Tony's drinking wouldn't have cracked above a PG-13.

>just because of depiction of onscreen drinking
>just because
>it says alcohol

Are you functionally retarded?

Attached: 1400007583308.gif (350x250, 686K)

Like this guy said, alcohol use gets you an R rating. It's fact.

They don't list it as a reason unless it is 100% the reason for the rating, it's literally how the MPAA works.

...

>They don't list it as a reason unless it is 100% the reason for the rating
They didn't, that wasn't actually the MPAA rating, it's from Common sense media. the MPAA statement is "Rated R for strong violence and language throughout, sexual content and graphic nudity"

What is this comment trying to say?

And alcohol, which you're excluding just to fit your narrative.

Am i getting trolled or are you really this stupid?

You can admit you were wrong now.

Attached: MPAA.png (796x122, 8K)

R ratings are for boobs and graphic violence. No movie has ever gotten an R rating, and the only stated reason was drinking. Prove me wrong.

Deadpool already proves you wrong.

Why must you insist on trolling? Fuck me for wanting a regular conversation on Yea Forums.

Where are you getting your information from?

I know, right? Are these guys idiots or are they just trolling?

Deadpool doesn't even mention alcohol in its MPAA rating. Only violence, nudity, sexual content, and language

You realize your source is a post edited with inspect element, right? Alcohol is the reason deadpool got an R rating.

imdb.com/title/tt0332452/parentalguide

Probably trolls, no one could be this stupid.

Hes just trolling you dude drop it.

How are you getting baited this hard?

what?

He's obviously just arguing in bad faith, why are you still falling for it?

i guess

Further proof that Yea Forums is going down the shitter.

You serious?