What is the difference between a cartoon character and a furry?

>the closeted butthurt coming off this image
Sure, sure, and traps aren't gay right?

Attached: 743e.jpg (372x356, 41K)

Didn't you get the memo? Everything is furry now. Just like how anyone androgynous is a trap.

But plucked chickens aren't sexy.

It's the intent. Unless it's by the furry community with the intention to be seen as furry art, it's not furry. It's like anime and manga, you may be some white kid in America drawing big eyes and small mouths, but you're not making anime or manga.

Attached: 1550549752562.jpg (1034x955, 72K)

>Cartoon character
The word that you are looking for is funny animals, user. Funny animals are pretty old, the most recognizable examples are Looney tunes, but they started in german ilustration around 1870-1880.

Attached: 1547913894338.jpg (600x437, 46K)

/thread

>they started in german ilustration around 1870-1880.
They started way before.

Looney Tunes are now considered furry.

They are cartoon characters.

>intention
I like that distintion.

Attached: obamadown.jpg (3581x2686, 893K)

Why TAWOG has no problem showing Gumball's pixelated dick and Richard's naked ass, But never naked Nicole?
Is this another Dexter's lab situation?

Attached: ZDEZ.png (2950x506, 2.28M)

Because Richard is a funny asshole

There isn't one. You guys are just in serious denial.

furries were around for longer then you think.

In fact, when Disney, Hanna-Barbera and Warner Brothers started using anthropomorphic characters, they coined the term "funny animals".

This was because back then "furries" where known as "Anthros" and they did not want any association with the anthropomorphic community.

Attached: 15380796_1206877276027431_3803890614029581993_n.jpg (261x196, 12K)

And it's here. The retard who thinks he is smart but doesn't what the fuck is talking about.

He isn't.

Defensive much?

So are you trying to tell me that this is peak comedy? a little boy's dick?

Attached: Gumball naked20.png (1108x455, 629K)

Yes, naked people is funny.

Why are americans like this? Why Is a underage cat penis waving around considered the "pinnacle of comedy" But a flat as a board cat with no feminine traits other than her eyes is considered too much? What a bunch of prudes...The land of the free, HA!

cringe

So the difference is if it is used in a cartoon setting, and the depiction is more animal then human they are called "Funny animals". But if the depiction is more human then animal and it is striving more towards human anatomical accuracy, it is a furry.

>Naked people
>funny

For a show that always use Nicole as a SJW device, They sure don't believe in equality.

>giving a shit about it
Your like the trap folk needing to justify to yourself that you are not this or that buzzword instead of just liking what you like and not giving a shit what autists on the internet think.

cringe

they're cartoon characters, they have no meaning unto themselves. Same thing applies when you start considering 2d lolis as human beings. They're not simply not real.

.Why are americans so afraid of naked females? I mean look at Nicole she's a fucking pole you can use that for comedy, Do they really think showing naked little boys ONLY, is the correct way to go? Shotacons are a thing you know.

>not knowing the point of OP's pic
Trapfags are retarded.

Whose the real autist? The fool who tries to make a distinction without a difference or the fool who tells him that's stupid?

>t. furry in denial

>And it's here. The retard who thinks he is smart but doesn't what the fuck is talking about.
>but doesn't what the fuck is talking about.
>doesn't what the fuck is
>The retard

Everyone is an autist in these discussions.

The joke is about the mods, newfag.

Anthro characters are as old as humanity itself. The fans of funny animals and anthro characters weren't a big fandom until 70's-80's-90's.

Why is Gumball pixelated cock the "pinnacle of comedy"? why they show his dick at least 6 times per season? Why are Anais or Nicole "literal stick bodies" sexual and any different than the penis of a little cartoon cat?

Attached: 1551383261371.png (528x612, 304K)

Penis=funny
Vagina=not funny

So giving free fap material to gay pedophiles is okay?

Attached: Gumball naked 52.png (2216x768, 1.9M)

Yes because Christians are ok with and even protect gay pedos.

This is wrong on many levels especially when you consider that intent is never really clear. Nobody is a mind reader.

The ONLY meaningful argument that can be made when referring to the distinction between furries and cartoon characters is when referring to the furry community exclusively.

We were played like a goddamn fiddle

Then Why is showing a underage cat penis okay? giving fap material for gay pedophiles, How is that any better than giving free fap material to straight guys?

I'm not a burger, but the culture of my country is heavely influenced by americans, and I can say, according to the popular media, penis jokes are pretty popular.

1. You made these exact posts the other day
2. Cut the bullshit you pretentious twat. This isn't about "equality" you just want to see naked females in children's cartoons so you can whack off.

It's not about sexuality, the female form is inherently sinful and must be covered. The male form is peak human aesthetic thus is fine.

Gay pedo fap bait=ok
Straight fap bait=not ok

if it's a talking animal walking on two les and wearing people clothes it's a furry
There are no super dooper special extra definitions that make you less of a furry for liking it.
If you like cartoon talking animals then you are a furry.
That's it

Attached: 4e2d838beddc6c698b002c8b.jpg (367x332, 20K)

This whole "naked little boys only" mentality is stupid. Do they like Gumball's dick more than anything? They show his dick and naked body at least 6 times per season, Why can't they show any female? Ben say they are not allowed to show adults naked, But then why they never show Anais naked either? Do they really enjoy Gumball's dick that much?

Attached: gh.png (872x1019, 567K)

Please, You need to be more progressive, Like Nicole!

Attached: 1551394661251.png (700x393, 446K)

Most people don't find a little girl naked funny, they tend to question the intent of the person who put it in.

What do you mean "now?"

Are you seriously going to lump together the normies who thought Lola was attractive in Space Jam with the costume-wearing degenerates?

Progressives hate depicting females naked, it caters to the male gaze.

So? You live in a shithole that enables gay pedophiles, How is that any better?

Women have secondary sexual attributes called breasts, men do not. It has everything to do with sexuality

fuck off diogenes

Nicole is flat, If anything Richard has breasts and they always show them.
If anything Ben is just gay and like underage cat boy's dicks and men with tits.

You asked for a reason I gave it, I don't see what the pedos have to do with things you seem oddly obsessed with them.

No, I'm going to lump the 1940s era looney tunes who were meant to be viewed by adults only and made to be your grandfather's fap material with it.

>insinuations can’t exist
>people aren’t mind readers so you can’t tell the difference just by looking at the art.
>oh, unless it’s intended to be furry art.

Why when people point out explicitly made nudity of male underage in a kid show, regardless of comedic purposes, and say how obviously, there is gender discrimination.

No the problem is that Americans are the pedos who keep wanting to inject their fantasies into kids shows

The only people who point it out are the ones upset they can't jack it to naked cartoon females.

Gotta problem with it move to Russia commie.

>This whole "naked little boys only" mentality is stupid.
Yes, it is, but this autistics jokes are so common around here that I've just started to give a fuck about it since 5 years ago.

Maybe because it's a thing of western culture, I mean, naked mans are not as outrateous as a naked woman. It's something cultural, pal.

Attached: Marilu thinking.jpg (869x903, 170K)

They must think Gumball's penis is the most hilarious thing ever since they show his dick so fucking often, I mean really? they are rolling this shitty joke on the floor at this point, Now it feels more like one of the crew or Ben's kinks.

Attached: Naked_in_the_bath_room.JPG.jpg (1920x1080, 196K)

Not him but people fap to cartoon females no matter what. Fanarts and other things.

Yeah but here we are with people complaining about the lack of fap bait.

So what? Do they really think no one faps to naked cartoon men (or little cartoon boys)? for a country that claims to be progressive America sure is more protective of the "poor" and "helpless" women that it is of any male.

Attached: Modelsheet_finn_-_naked.jpg (870x518, 45K)

I liked how the boys bullied Marilu.

"furry" is the most broad term at the moment. It literally means whatever tue fuck a person wants. Anthropomorfic animals in a cartoon? Sure. Furry characters drawn for the sole purpose of porn? Yeah sure. Fursuiters? People who just like the aesthetics of werewolves? Sonic fans, 10 year old deviantart kids with sparkledogs...

Everything is furry now.

And wondering why pedo fap bait is perfectly fine and actually being argued as okay by Americans. That shit makes no sense

If you masturbate to it, it's furry.
Nicole from gumball is not only furry, but it's a sure sign you have very low standards for your drawn porn.

I think you're just bad at making jokes
The whole concept of what a joke actually is seems to go above your head

Nah I'm kidding get fucked furry faggot

Why do you think it's a fap thing? The reason they can do males but not females is the advertisers don't give a shit about naked males.

read the thread asshole, we are on a different subject

Most on-model females aren't hot tho.

Pedo fap bait is only okay if the character is male, Americans are probably gay since they get very defensive about this.

Attached: ca5e0eb186e15942cdc20a814687ffb56f547fbcf02dea065166d1a19f62a319.jpg (571x444, 94K)

>And wondering why pedo fap bait is perfectly fine
Because puritan hate the female form not the male form.

I said it's not only a thing of cartoons, I've seen naked characters in movies and series and penis/butt jokes. So what's the origin, I don't really know, and to be honest I don't care enough to search. It's like boobs are not a sexual thing in african tribes, I'm pretty sure if they had a budget to make cartoons they would make tit jokes as we make weaner jokes.

When they do it once or twice I can give them the benefit of the doubt, But when they show a little naked boy's pixelated cock for more than 12 minutes in the whole series like they do with Gumball...Then I think maybe they are just gay pedos.

Do you really think that's a pedo bait? It's a dumb penis joke, for jesus christ..

Attached: 4real.jpg (655x647, 67K)

>The male form is peak human aesthetic thus is fine.
This. Prove him wrong.

Attached: 1511085966864.jpg (736x779, 198K)

showing a childs penis on screen is 100% pedo shit and nothing else, quit trying to hide behind "muh comedy" to explain it

Yeah sure, That's why bart show his naked ass on almost every episode and his naked penis twice one time on the movie then on the show for a few seconds, But no female can be naked of course.

It's a dumb joke, faggot, why would you Fox even try to target the pedofags? That's a nonesense.

Attached: 400.png (400x400, 215K)

>can't see nudity as anything but sexual
Careful user your american is showing.

Do you have any idea how many people fap to naked Gumball? why is okay to give official fap material to gay pedos, But any kind of female nudity is forbbiden even in cartoons aimed at "adults"?

Attached: 0ds12cbqh7.jpg (543x500, 55K)

I'm starting thinking you guys are triggered because the lolicon crap is not mainstream in western media.

Accept it, it was a fucking joke, I watched the simpsons in the movie theater, everyone laugh and no one got salty besides some autistic religious groups.

Attached: baad2ab8e3b9ed5d76726c83222ee00e9acbd5053634a65ed6896900083d1a1f.jpg (495x447, 39K)

A cartoon character is a cartoon character. A furry is a human being that wants to be an anthropomorphic animal and dresses up in fursuits.

>Naked pedo bait intentionally added to show

"I-it's just a joke guys.....I swear"

You're wrong on a simple level: Intention is often what defines art.

mods?

Ones a joke another is sexual.

>But any kind of female nudity is forbbiden even in cartoons aimed at "adults"?
Gee, you haven't watched french toons, aren't ya?

Then explain me why is this okay? But any kind of female nudity is not? If there's nothing sexual about nudity then why are Americans so afraid of it?

Attached: a9b9783cc1974b05e7061b46f29624ce.jpg (1000x1571, 246K)

And I think you are triggered by someone pointing out your pedo shit and trying extra hard to damage control that situation

>I...I can't se nudity as anything b...but sexual
Okay, pal.

you can make insinuations all day long but it's a meaningless exercise and you're not going to convince anybody with them.

>Posting a Steven Universe pic.
Great! another example of a "progressive" show that only allows male nudity.

Attached: SHOTACON.png (877x900, 597K)

>I can't have a show without something to fap placed in it

I think you got a problem

>If there's nothing sexual about nudity then why are Americans so afraid of it?
Because American culture considers female nudity to be sexual. As well you see this phenominan in anime with young boys penises being depicted but not females and even in shows with no other nudity.

There's poeple who faps to little cartoon kids, Why is giving fap material to them okay?

Ntgb
In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

Because no one gives a shit.

Back in the can, furry.

Because the majority(read:straight non-pedos) doesn't consider it sexual.

Speak for yourself bitch.

Attached: 1548962359547.jpg (460x468, 50K)

>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.
Wow...That's no very "progressive" true equality? no such thing! lets act like women are special snowflakes that need more of everything than any man will ever get.

Or they absolutely do and that's why they keep adding it to their shows over and over again

Yes, They do.

Attached: nm_67__foster_s_home_for_imaginary_friends_by_jane1_dczbwk9-fullview.jpg (1024x384, 50K)

Yeah it's a double standard live with it or ask yourself why you have an issue with it in the first place.

Obviously they don't give a shit or else this would not have aired.

Are furry characters a recent contributor for the gigantic spike in LGBT people, considering a large chunk of the fandom is bisexual or gay?

Yes, Why is okay to show naked little boys? Why americans are so defensive about it? Do they like little boys dicks and butts?

>Obviously they don't give a shit or else this would not have aired.
Are you implying they don't air this because the guys in charge of the networks get sweaty and horny over it?

Obviously there are too damn many pedos in the industry or else this would not have aired

WHY DO YOU FUCKING IDIOTS RESPOND TO SUCH OBVIOUS BAIT?

HE GIVES EXACTLY ZERO FUCKS ABOUT NAKED DRAWINGS, HE JUST WANT YOU DOUBLENIGGERS TO ACKNOWLEDGE HIS EXISTENCE IN THE FORM OF (You)s BECAUSE HE'S TOO SOCIALLY RETARDED TO GO OUTSIDE AND MEET ACTUAL PEOPLE, SO HIS ONLY CHANCE TO INTERACT WITH OTHERS IS BY SHITPOSTING IN A TAIWANESE LOBSTER COOKING NEWSGROUP.

Friendly reminder that capslock is cruisecontrol for cool.

Attached: 1551413301132.jpg (1052x453, 135K)

>Yes, Why is okay to show naked little boys
Because that's the way it is.

We have what, 70 years of crossdressing Bugs to go by here?

Why are naked little boys ok? Why do American media shows naked little boys so fucking often? Why are females of any kind forbbiden to be naked?

Attached: dex.jpg (1024x1150, 325K)

I'm implying they did air it because no one gives a shit.

>I'I'm not a pedo I swear!!! Its everyone else' fault that fap bait is on tv every day in America!!!!

I'm not sure why you're trying to have this conversation. I'm not touting it as progressive values, just as a measure of why some things are more tasteful than others. It looks you don't disagree with the three answers I gave you, you just really don't like one of them.

Little boy naked=funny
Female naked=bad
Simple as.

And why is that the why it is? Why are americans okay with pandering to gay pedophiles, but no straight people? I mean America is always trying to get Japan to ban lolicon, But they are okay with Gumball's naked pixelated COCK?!

You just got three answers and didn't refute a single one of them.

...

>And why is that the why it is?
Puritans.

...

>Projecting this hard.

Attached: 151065769428.png (693x701, 407K)

So you guys are gay pedophiles, Got it.

>And why is that the why it is?
Patriarchal double standard, go complain about it on tumblr if it offends you.

Attached: nm_.jpg (843x626, 122K)

I too have watchd down the rabbit hole

None of them answered a single damn thing, nothing but avoiding the question and hiding behind "my comedy"

Just admit you want fap bait in your cartoons already. Things might be a lot easier for you if you just come right out and admit that you like naked boys in shows and do not care about the series as long as you get what you want.

Landwhales don't give a shit about this They enjoy being special snowflakes...If anything they fap to Steven and Gumball, Like Sugar faps to EEnE.

I told you the answer its a double standard it exists based on the patriarchal notion that males strong and female weak, don't like it be the change you want to see and make a naked loli cartoon.

Here you go, you can address these individually:

>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

>Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

>Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

But why are you continuing the double standard?

Because I don't care.

You forgot to answer the following, Why Americans are okay with underage male nudity like Bart and Gumball's dicks, But do everything they can to force Japan to ban any kind of naked loli?

I have the privilege to ignore it.

Suck my barbed dick, user

Those three answers are all answers to that question.

Something about WW2 maybe? I heard that's why they still censor porn and gave rise tentacle porn.
Other than that, probably
>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

>Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

>Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

Okay so... Americans are gay? They never complained about little Goku's naked dick when the original Dragon Ball series DVD was released in America, But Funimation censored a naked loli in DitB later, Why is a male underage dick okay but a bare underage chest is the end of the world?

Some more

Attached: sh.jpg (1024x381, 113K)

Furry is a subset of "cartoon character". It's a class that is "cartoon character" with extra functions.
Next time, you should ask a question along the lines of:
>what is the difference between this subset of X and that subset of X?
instead of:
>what is the difference between this subset of X and X?

>Why is a male underage dick okay but a bare underage chest is the end of the world
Very simple.
>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

>Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

>Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

You are not giving any response, You seem to enjoy naked little boys and are trying to hide that fact behinf "Muh comedy".

It's not so much about comedy as if is about
>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

>Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

>Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

I gave you the reason user, you can take it or continue bitching about pedos.

That doesn't make any sense, Why are Americans so afraid of any kind of female nudity, But are okay with normalizing gay pedophilia?
The fact that many anons including you get so defensive over shota's dicks goes to show how much the media can brainwash you into accepting gay pedophilia.

>Why are Americans so afraid of any kind of female nudity, But are okay with normalizing gay pedophilia?
Very simple actually.
>In the larger dynamics where women are more physically helpless and men can overpower then, rape them, and leave them with a baby to raise, male nudity isn't as offensive because males have less of a need for protecting.

>Females are seen as automatically sexual and are often measured by this while males are seen as less sexualized, their nudity more easily written off as a joke than something sexual.

>Males don't have the double standard of exposed breasts being indecent and sexual so they have more possibilities with nudity jokes.

I've never understood the hate for furry characters. They're just anthropomorphic exaggerations of animals. How is that any different than robots or aliens or whatever? Unless it's that weird fursuit shit I don't know why people freak out so hard about this. They've done this since the 20's.

Imagine being this actually gay.

Attached: n.jpg (700x519, 80K)

Okay so... Americans are gay? They never complained about little Goku's naked dick when the original Dragon Ball series DVD was released in America, But Funimation censored a naked loli in DitB later, Why is a male underage dick okay but a bare underage chest is the end of the world? That doesn't make any sense, Why are Americans so afraid of any kind of female nudity, But are okay with normalizing gay pedophilia?
The fact that many anons including you get so defensive over shota's dicks goes to show how much the media can brainwash you into accepting gay pedophilia.

Friendly reminder that you can't win, since you two are not playing the same game.
You think you're debating someone, but he's not interested in a debate. He just want (You)s because it helps him stave off the crippling loneliness for a little while, and he's willing to use every single fallacy in the book just to keep your (You)s flowing.

It's more people hate furries.

>user who doesn't like nude males characters in cartoons literally have a folder filled with nude male characters in cartoons
Wew

Attached: 152993922.jpg (348x333, 17K)

The absence of empathy for men and boys.

Why is shotacon okay but loli should be banned?

I stopped being serious when I called him a commie

Because

Diogenes!!!!

Then stop replying to him altogether. He doesn't care what you reply with, as long as you give him attention.

>lolicon
"You are a fucking degenerated, stop doing nasty things to little girls you fucking piece of shit"
>Shotacon
"Brave, boy, you are based as fuck"

At least, that's how my country works, I'm not saying Old woman-young man relationships are normal around here, btw but it's a common male fantasy.

Why are naked little cartoon boys so widely available in American AKA the country that wants Japan to ban loli?

Oh, goddamnit you are so fucking triggered because based america is trying to ban japan pedocrap.

Attached: 154541770659.jpg (899x719, 65K)

Japan sidded with Hitler this lolicons are Nazis.

Why America doesn't ban Shota? Why are naked little boys so common and widely available in American media?

Attached: 1525278744494.gif (316x231, 327K)

>Why is Gumball pixelated cock the "pinnacle of comedy"?
because in universe he doesn't really have a cock, the pixelated blurry mess it's what he actually has between his legs

Nips can tell the difference between drawings and reality.
Can you?

inb4
>tl;dr
Fuck you, read it.

Attached: 1507130496974.jpg (1222x2845, 2.39M)

tl;dr

Then why are only little MALE kids allowed to be naked on that show?
Tell that to Americans so they can stop bitchin' about lolis and trying to ban them.

Oh god, you are so fucking PISSED.

Attached: 3ba03d81d09ae098f8537d546b538a7b65e554a628d5c6edddb9ef90fb9fe329.png (477x481, 192K)

Intention is intrinsic to any art form, regardless of how obviously it’s conveyed or how receptive the audience is. The problem is the subjective nature of it; ask anyone what a painting or a sculpture means and you’ll probably get a different answer every time, but that doesn’t mean the artist didn’t create it with an express meaning behind it. Consequently, most people would look a Tony the Tiger and see a colorful cereal mascot designed to appeal to children and sell the product, whereas furries see a bara daddy they want to dom them.

i think nicole was shown naked, with the hands covering the bits, no pixelation.
honestly, i would have guessed they'd do that more often, since they apply slapstick to anais pretty frequently when the situation calls for it

Yeah but that was a split second, Gumball on the other hand has show his naked pixelated cock and bare ass for about 12 minutes or more in the entire series.

Attached: 2BDC00A5-47C6-4530-80F7-D5CC28620616.gif (500x269, 883K)

Cool argument, Read here

Attached: 1510363496096.png (528x432, 212K)

Americans only care about getting rid of fictional naked girls, They are more than Okay with Arabic guys getting married with real little girls since trying to get rid of that wont give them snowflake points.

>naked pixelated cock and bare ass for about 12 minutes or more in the entire series
do you have a compilation to post?
because you obviously went through the entire series to mark everytime it happens so you might as well.

honestly tho, darwins feet being pixelated because he has no torso to dangle anything from is hilarious and you can't tell me otherwise

>If someone draws something in anime style, it's not anime

First of all, everyone recognizes it's in anime style. Second of all, 'anime' is a classification of media based on form and geographic-national identity (Japanese). What makes something 'Furry' has nothing to do with that sort of classification, as 'furry' classification is distinctly sexualized characters with animal traits.

Attached: 45322458_10155557239221326_1841200510690918400_o.jpg (990x990, 137K)

Yes I have.

Nicole is the one that deserves slapstick.

>'Furry' has nothing to do with that sort of classification, as 'furry' classification is distinctly sexualized characters with animal traits.
I disagree. A furry can make something non-sexualized and it still be furry art. Furries often have quadrupedal fursonas stylized after Balto and it's still furry even though Balto is not.

I consider the term "furry" to refer more to certain fandoms or groups who are just obsessed with sexualizing anthro characters more than referring to the characters themselves.

Like how if you were to talk about Wreck-It Ralph, you would describe him as a big guy. But anyone who sexualizes him is a barafag.

Just don't buy those weird suits or roleplay in chatrooms and you'll be fine.

When you see it, you just know.

Attached: tumblr_p0nv5grTmU1ts1i17o1_500[1].png (500x268, 207K)

Kitty Katswell is the last female character that I remember being beaten up constantly, Most cartoons are afraid of hurting girls in any way.
Of course female slapstick is more common in anime than cartoons.

Attached: ZKIT.png (765x1051, 710K)

Attached: ZKIT2.png (954x1080, 594K)

Raven and Starfire in TTG.
>Of course female slapstick is more common in anime than cartoons.
It's not.

Phineas and Ferb had no problem beating up Candice every episode

OP and the derailer are both faggots.
desuarchive.org/co/thread/106165273/#106165273
Improve Yea Forums by reporting them.

>It's not.
Don't tell lies on internet, user.

Attached: 1477592657403.gif (500x281, 819K)

If its a cartoon, and animal, and talking like people then you've got a furry.

I really wanted to like that show because of Kitty, but I couldn't even make it through the first episode. Dudley being a ginormous retard and the main character, which presumably means he gets most screentime, completely ruined it.

Attached: 1492575410802.png (675x517, 297K)