"Bart, your mortal enemy is on the radio!"
"My mortal enemy?"
"And now it's time for more deeeementedness with Dr. Demento."
"AAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!"
"No Bart, your other mortal enemy. Sideshow Bob."
"I can't believe I'm only 10 and I already have two mortal enemies."
"Bart, your mortal enemy is on the radio!"
Sneed!
Why they always show Bart naked, But never Lisa?
Dr. Demento retired years ago. Actually that whole le Gen Xer shock humor thing should be left in the 80s-90s where it belongs.
literally the first result on google
They say that was an animation mistake.
Down with sexism!
Down with sexism!
Dr Demento wasn't a shock jock show, it was a comedy show.
Good episode, pity very few lines from it can be quoted because /pol/.
Besides they never show her naked butt (unless you count that French commercial)
Go back to classical Greco-Roman art. Little girls were seldom depicted nude, or for that matter at all. The male form was athletic and powerful (and erotic if you were gay), the female form was erotic, and little boys were impish. Little girls just weren't anything and their flat, featureless bodies not very interesting from an artistic standpoint.
So that is why they're rarely shown nude in cartoons and comics.
>KissCartoon
Can't picture a 10 year old listening to shows aimed at jaded college students though.
>So that is why they're rarely shown nude in cartoons and comics.
Because americans are gay?
You can when it's being written by a jaded Harvard grad TV writer.
> All right. This is dedicated to Bart Simpson with the message, "I amcoming to kill you slowly and painfully!"
"Crush criminals and rule you like a king!"
Intwesting.
i miss the YTMND's...............
Go read old Turma da Monica comics, at least before they censored them due to SJWs.
Still surprised they never had Howard Stern as a guest star.
So do you simpsons-pedos just camp these threads out, when you don't make them, or what?
Even if she were wearing an actual skirt, what school would let an 8-year-old girl dress like that for a play?
This, people forget that even that "Golden Age" was seen through the lens of Harvard-educated, National Lampoon-type writers. It's a very particular type of humor that still has its own very evident idiosyncrasies.
This tendency seemed to be at its strongest in Seasons 5-6 which is what the OP episode belongs to.
Is that why Bart is a fan of Mad Magazine even though I never knew a single 10 year old in the 90s, myself included, that read it?
Has Mad been relevant at all since the 60s? Even most of the Simpsons writers would have seemed too young to remember its prime.
Just download some Rule 34, your horny fucks
it's true, because animation was a mistake.
I read Mad when I was about that age. Kids can appreciate movie parodies and Spy vs. Spy,
S
N
no
E
E.
D
C-c-c-c-combo breaker!
>>>/2009/
I'd think only Harry Shearer and James L. Brooks might have been old enough to read 50s-60s Mad.
>>>>/2009/
I wish I could.
AHAHAHAHAHA
WIPEOUT
Among the Season 1-8 writers Oakley & Weinstein were some of the youngest, being both 29 when they became showrunners in Season 7. John Swartzwelder is about the same age as Matt Groening, he was one of the older writers. On the DVD commentary for 'Round Springfield they joked that Harry Shearer and Groening were totally in awe of Steve Allen, but the younger guys like O&W really didn't know who he was.
and Kelsey Grammer was/is a conservative, and it made fun of Quimby (who's a Democrat) a lot.
Simpsons was at its best when its sharp satire was aimed at everyone and everything. It clearly had a left-wing bent but still had a healthy amount of self-awareness.
You're kind of ignoring all the art periods after that when they did depict little girls.