Into The Spider-Verse has incredible animation

youtu.be/jEXUG_vN540

video analyzing the animation of Spider-Verse, now that its leaked and people can comb over the movie frame-by-frame

I think most people on this board noticed the obvious things like, the most mostly animating on twos but switching to ones whenever anything acrobatic happens. And the animation smears as opposed opposed to motion blurs.

But then there's shit like
>both Spider-Men swinging through forest
>Peter is animating on ones
>Miles on twos
>both in the same shot
>this conveys that Peter is more experienced and acrobatic while Miles is clumsy and fumbling

Sasuga!

Attached: miles.jpg (1920x1080, 534K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2-Nn1vGLDjw
youtu.be/-gH-eBfgj1E
youtu.be/1LqnoYdg2bM
youtube.com/watch?v=i4tNuM9XttM
youtube.com/watch?v=Ala8dGr1soU
youtu.be/sY5MmhLQBng
youtube.com/watch?v=5nKelKIwHbs
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Incredibles 2 has better animation

>106071331
Lol

Not even close. I2 was merely aiming for "what looks good according to our data about who we want to buy tickets" and had the budget to hit it. Spider-Verse boldly tries things that are radically different and artistically motivated knowing that it would risk losing everyone.

If I2 does win the Oscar, the Academy doesn't have any hope of reclaiming any credibility in the category. They're already on thin fucking ice by whining about "opportunities for independent filmmakers" in the shorts category, then turning around and saying "lol didnt watch" about anime that isn't Ghibli.

never saw, but it probably does in at least few ways

still, I made this thread because it's about appreciating the way Spider-Verse uses 3D CGI animation in a more traditional way. Smears, playing with the frame rate, comic book stylings, the whole shebang.

Are the Incredibles movies worth watching in one session? I only ever saw the first one like 15 years ago.

>Are the Incredibles movies worth watching in one session? I only ever saw the first one like 15 years ago.
Might as well since the sequel might as well just be the first movie again.

how did they make CGI smears? did they draw it traditionally? man i really need to rewatch this film.

some of them are hand-drawn, and I think in some cases they just had Spider-Man's hand repeated several times in one frame to create an old-school smear

Honestly I don't care if the film always succeeded in it's animation.
The fact that it was innovating is way more valuable than the same good CGI animation that's been done before.

I suppose that has been done with ghost frames, most of the 3d packages have it as helper to see the movement
youtube.com/watch?v=2-Nn1vGLDjw

You can absolutely do smears in 3D, even in live-rendered animation, like a video game. Overwatch has a bunch, they look hilarious when frozen.

imagine having such shit taste to see this movie and think the animation was bad

>muh 10 fps

the layman is just really used to seeing nothing but Pixar/Dreamworks clones, all the see is the lower framerate sometimes and call it choppy

personally I can't imagine, the movie is still visually gorgeous even without the animation. The fucking coloring during the big fights at the hadron collider was fucking intense man. So glad I saw it in theaters.

stop being such a shill - especially for a movie that really had nothing spectacular about it animation wise' - it was all stuff you can see on short subjects on Vimeo or You Tube

I agree that the marketing of "THIS SHIT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE" is a bit overblown, it was still cool seeing this shit on the big screen in a big-budget movie

but do link the short subjects because I'd probably like watching them too

>that really had nothing spectacular about it animation wise
Well it wasn't revolutionary but the mix of 2d and 3d is good, and it's nice to see something diferent in 3d animation from time to time, they also added all the work from the movie to OpenColorIO which is open source

I think what overwatch does is more like exaggerated stretch & squish than a smear. Although the line between the two is a little blurry anyways

>did they draw it traditionally?
yes they did. there were videos on facebook explaining it frame by frame, but they are already lost to time.

Sony Animation is a talented studio. Anyone who watched the Hotel Transylvania movies with an animator's eye would know that. They're just usually burdened with awful scripts. This time they lucked out.

>If I2 does win the Oscar, the Academy doesn't have any hope of reclaiming any credibility in the category.
You poor naive child

>Anyone who watched the Hotel Transylvania movies with an animator's eye would know that
explain

any of the Hotel Transylvania movies has better animation than anything Pixar has shat out in the past decade.

Attached: Peni spats1.png (336x2507, 997K)

>106071331

Attached: 1547439926784.png (540x544, 376K)

I think it was a separate model with just the body part

I don't understand what you mean by this

BAGEL!

Attached: BAGEL.png (1920x796, 1.62M)

also not just the Hotel transylvania movies
youtu.be/-gH-eBfgj1E
but even the fucking lego movies
youtu.be/1LqnoYdg2bM
like the video in the op said. All because 3D cartoon movies these days are primary made to mimic real life movies that SHOULD NOT stop it being being a cartoon.
youtube.com/watch?v=i4tNuM9XttM
youtube.com/watch?v=Ala8dGr1soU

Attached: BAGEL2.png (1920x796, 1.68M)

>Popeye (2016) movie
Why haven't I heard of this?

because it got cancelled and replaced by something that will make you mad the instant you read the movie title
The emoji movie

This makes me sad.

Disappointing, but it makes sense from a business perspective. Like what are kids going to be interested in more, emojis or an old sailor that's been around since the 30s and hasn't really been used in over 30 years?

Attached: 1550682427983.gif (500x379, 933K)

WHAT
THE
FUCK
YOUTUBE
IS THIS SHIT IN MY RECOMMECONEDATION
youtu.be/sY5MmhLQBng

It's not like no one knows who Popeye is.

well it gets worse
youtube.com/watch?v=5nKelKIwHbs

Where's the violence?

>violence
>current generation
cant show mild femininity
and violence is getting toned down from the root up
what will cartoons be like in 10 more years?

Attached: 1525910898183.jpg (1200x800, 97K)

>no popeye movie by Genndy, a director with both action and comedic experience
>instead we got "Popeye for kids" with bad animation and without violence, where in the 1930s kids liked it because of the violence
>instead we got "emoji movie", a movie that is almost universally hated
Who fucked up with this?

$0.70 has been deposited into your Disney account

Sony and their incompetence, don't you remember those email leaks?

Any chance they'll be fired?

Yes, thank you user.

Into The Spider-Verse actually has bad animation.

Absolutely not. It's too garish and much too fast. You have 0 opportunity to appreciate the craft because most of the best animation is only present for a few frames and you have to pause over and over to let your brain register what it just saw.

This overproduced mess leaves the same tacky aftertaste as the Emoji Movie. It's doing everything short of giving a handjob to maintain your attention ever second with corny jokes and visual diarreha and there's no way to respect this level of desperation. Animation is meant to be slow and deliberate, to let people study it.

Attached: fishgun bait.jpg (124x125, 3K)

Watching it now.

>that jab at Raimi-man 3
>Miles has Benis on his contact list
I'm enjoying it.

i think it's because of how stretchy it is. Pixar is more focused on realistic models and effects, while Sony embraced traditional animation techniques.

Maybe you're just old and slow.
This sounds exactly like the shit people say about the 90's Spider-Man cartoon. You were wrong then and you're wrong now. Up your brain-power, dad!

Incredibles 2 wasn't the first of its kind, user.

Anyone over 22 is old enough to have seen traditional animation die.

>Animation is meant to be slow and deliberate, to let people study it.
who said that

Attached: 1537606525381.gif (395x408, 1.96M)

Incredibles 2's animation is just trying hard to emulate the physics of reality and make it more like the live-action movie, but Pixar and Disney are starting to ignore what animation should stand originally. Spider Verse gave the great lesson to the industry how the future direction of animation should be.

>great lesson to the industry
To bad no one cared to notice, and it had no influence whatsoever

here's a (You), thank me later

Attached: 1550504561471.jpg (607x607, 28K)

Name one thing it influenced

This is the most pretentious thing I've ever read on Yea Forums.

Cartoons have been pussified shit since the early 00s. Columbine and 9/11 completely fucked western animation. Netflix might be able to save it because god knows TV has given up.

Explain this

Attached: Cecil_With_A_Gun.png (285x284, 68K)

Pussified shit.

Explain how this is pussified shit

Attached: 1522965852900.webm (1280x544, 2.31M)

It only came out a few months ago shit for brains

>things can only influence something else if its been in the public eye for years

>Early 00s
Anything made after TMNT, aka "We have bladed weapons but never stab people", is automatically faggot shit for babies.

>video analyzing
cringe

No blood means no kill, having blood inside you means you are alive so when someone is popped open they must bleed to die. Those clones may as well be droids in the eyes of the one true God.

How many pre-2000 animated children's shows had blood, you whiny fuck?

That's exactly the point , it goes way further back than that. Hell that user isn't going far enough. I wouldn't hesitate to say that cartoon's have always been for pussy ass children. Only very rarely did we get anything where people are legitimately turned into flesh, gore, sinew and lots of blood with powerful attacks. That's what animation should be. Destruction and blood.

Sounds like Family Guy or South Park would be right up your alley

106071331
Laziest fucking bait I've seen all year, come the fuck on /co, you're more creative than this

>animating on 2's and smears are now considered revolutionary
>the absolute state of the animation industry

>people actually saying Spider-Verse's animation was bad

I don't understand how you could possibly be so fucked in the head. That movie was gorgeous.

Also, the Easter eggs.

>The "Clone College" poster in one of the alternate Spiderworlds (I think it was Peter B. Parker's) complete with older Ghandi and Abe looking out from a billboard onto Times Square
>The flawless fluidity of the pan-shot when Liv is "examining" the newly arrived Gwen, with that look of absolute wonder on her face (she really does want to dissect ALL the spiderpeople)
>The fact that the only reason Peter B. was wearing sweatpants in the Lab heist was to differentiate him for the audience, but then they had to animate scientists realistically reacting to a Spider-Man in sweatpants, hence their nonplussed faces

This movie was a gift and I'll happily bitchslap anyone who says otherwise. Get your pretentious heads out of your asses. We should be glad films like this exist to inspire us to do even better animation in the future.

Attached: 1489869055884.png (772x319, 185K)

Animating on 2's doesn't work for CG animation. In some scenes they animated on 3's. Pretty bad. That and the terrible epileptic flashing lights and the chromatic aberration ruined this movie.

>how did they make CGI smears?
well, I know in the Lego Movie they used Legos to make smears. Here's a shot of Benny when he's spazzing out.

Attached: benny smear lego mive.jpg (1366x570, 108K)

that's why Disney killed it

>the three gets their origin stories told at the same time
>noir and peni getting confused halfway their monologue from hearing porker's story
It's the little details

>I think most people on this board noticed the obvious things like, the most mostly animating on twos but switching to ones whenever anything acrobatic happens. And the animation smears as opposed opposed to motion blurs.
Uh yeah sure I did haha

Done by the same guys, too

>Prowler vs original Peter is the best and shortest fight
I'm a tiny bit annoyed