Why do people want the underdogs to lose?

Why do people want the underdogs to lose?

Attached: LFC.png (480x480, 137K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wSJVL74OlQk
youtube.com/watch?v=tKzjMdU47C4
transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-liverpool/alletransfers/verein/31
youtube.com/watch?v=py7lWkC9upM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>underdogs

Attached: 1405033894055.jpg (231x363, 25K)

Because they have a history of murdering fans and getting English teams banned from international competitions

They’re in the top 3 of Europe. They aren’t underdogs.

They are United customers

You're genuinely delusionally retarded if you think Liverpool aren't the underdogs vs. oil rich Arab cock.

liverpol is possibly the most annoying team with most annoying fans in existence

Liverpool has the bigger fanbase, bigger history and has the media agenda behind them

They're murderers, chav scum and have the biggest complex in football

>Murderers being the underdogs
kek

Yea Forums is strong mind board while Liverpool is as weak minded as you be

this

no one should win
liverpoo fans aren't human
saud city customers aren't much better

Reminder that all ABL related posts should be made in the relevant /abl/ general

>media agenda
Does all the inbreeding create paranoia in you mancs?

Yea Forums is a Liverpool board

I like the idea of there being punching bags who exist just to suffer

But how can they be underdogs when their fans say they are one of the biggest teams ever?

Schadenfreude.

I don't care who wins as long I can shitpost to be honest

Attached: 1503771598487.jpg (456x667, 68K)

Contrarianism.
Cheering on a plastic oil conglomerate is preferable to hearing Some Bragging for a Season to these betas on this board.

That would be Real

Sauce me up

>heysel was a one off incident
fucking zoomers

Support an Irish team

they'd rather see their daughter shat on by a saudi prince than "le reddit" club succeed.

Liverpool is more Irish than English soft lad.

youtube.com/watch?v=wSJVL74OlQk

you can be as plastic as you like mate it doesn't change the fact that you have to be on the boat back to dublin for work tomorrow

Attached: lp.png (483x294, 128K)

Liverpool is owned by an American, it's as plastic as it gets

I'm scouse a neet mate, might wake up at noon and play far cry in the afternoon.

Attached: 1544296098061.jpg (600x600, 128K)

I want liverslip to slip for the memes and the massive amount of asshurt it will cause.

Right because Liverpoo didnt spend close to the same amount as Shitty has on players. Nope, Van Dijk, Allisson, Keita and Fabinho were bargain bin cheap buys la'

Stop trying to get Yea Forums to hate Lester, you stupid bandwagoning irish trash

no ones ass hurt tho, how can you be upset when it's been inevitable city are going to win the league for over a week now. klopp has a young team, they're in a semi final with a 50/50 chance of winning the cup.

>far cry
Wew a neet bin dipper with shit taste
Please kys

>underdogs

Attached: 1549921411688.jpg (356x374, 36K)

i like playing with the sniper rifle or bow an arrow taking out the checkpoints. i can listen to podcasts at the same time because theres no narrative to follow. super comfy.

>pic unrelated
Also EXPERIENCE THE POWER OF A I

Attached: download (6).jpg (300x168, 5K)

cmon lad that makes me sad genuinely imaging your existence

cost of team = underdogs. pretty simple to follow tacohead

reddit hates liverpool though

probably happier than you if were putting bants aside.

youtube.com/watch?v=tKzjMdU47C4

Imagine losing only once in 38 games and still not winning the title. Fucking hilarious 2bh

How much did liverpool spend on their team?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-04-30 at 22.50.03.png (620x522, 378K)

Sold Coutinho for 140m mate.

>muh net spend

based retard

>96

is that the best you can do.

Attached: 6f735f40aad158b7acb6ee8f9da02e6a.gif (373x450, 3.95M)

Why do Americans want underdogs to win?

18/19 Spent: £163.98m Sold: £34.65m =-129,33
17/19 Spent: £156.49m Sold: £166.05m =+9,56
16/17 Spent: £71.91m Sold: £76.41m =+4.5
15/16 Spent: £112.86m Sold: £81.50m =-31,36
14/15 Spent: £136.29m Sold: £89.34m =-46,95
13/14 Spent: £52.29m Sold: £29.34m =-22,95
12/13 Spent: £63.54m Sold: £9.41m =-54,13
11/12 Spent: £59.87m Sold: £20.61m =-39,26
10/11 Spent: £87.77m Sold: £91.35m =+3,58

Netspend: £306,34m
transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-liverpool/alletransfers/verein/31

based retard

missed 19/20 sold danny ings for £19.98m
so netspend 286,36

Nothing wrong with spending money lad. But arguing that Liverpool isn't is retarded.

you probably count terrorist attacks by muslins from the 12th of September 2001 onwards. Swedecuck

You are free to do the rest of the years. I went bt 10/11 since that what used

wut

Attached: Screenshot 2019-04-28 at 21.02.36.png (646x122, 84K)

nvm then. A quick check tells me netspend will be bigger anywho

>city wins: everyone is mad and the algerian gets to shitpost for a year
>liverpool wins: non-stop liverpool semen slurping from lifelong liverpool fans from wales and ireland
at the end of the day united are eating, and that's all that really matters isn't it?

Why didn't they win the title when they've spent double what Leicester did

because we are bitter losers, seeing liverpool win is like seeing one of us finally making it and succeeding. no, losers must remain losers.

>underdog
this is our anthem. never forget

youtube.com/watch?v=py7lWkC9upM

>biggest British club
>underdogs
I¨will never understand this meme

is this shit AI generated

looks off

...

gloria guida, italian actress. her and rita faltoyano are my waifus

Attached: ComplicatedRecklessGyrfalcon.webm (480x368, 315K)

Like your cuntry

Irrelevant. I don't care about your feelings towards the club, I'm talking about the facts. Liverpool are the underdogs in this case.

Disregarding net spend is retarded as shit, mutt. City buy without needing to sell, Liverpool always need to sell in order to buy. Enjoy that oiled up Muslim cock I guess.

They literally did not spend almost the same as city. They outspent almost everyone else, but not even close to city

Net spend is irrelevant. They're still just a soulless corporation club who bought their way to success. Doesnt matter how they got the money.

>A quick check

19/20 Spent: 0 Sold: £19.98m =+£19.98m
18/19 Spent: £163.98m Sold: £34.65m =-129,33
17/19 Spent: £156.49m Sold: £166.05m =+9,56
16/17 Spent: £71.91m Sold: £76.41m =+4.5
15/16 Spent: £112.86m Sold: £81.50m =-31,36
14/15 Spent: £136.29m Sold: £89.34m =-46,95
13/14 Spent: £52.29m Sold: £29.34m =-22,95
12/13 Spent: £63.54m Sold: £9.41m =-54,13
11/12 Spent: £59.87m Sold: £20.61m =-39,26
10/11 Spent: £87.77m Sold: £91.35m =+3,58
09/10 Spent: £39.15m Sold: £43.70m =+4.55
08/09 Spent: £64.31m Sold: £41.36m =-22,95
07/08 Spent: £81.63m Sold: £40.73m =-40,9
06/07 Spent: £41.40m Sold: £18.90m =-22,5
05/06 Spent: £39.65m Sold: £17.14m =-22,51
04/05 Spent: £52.56m Sold: £22.11m =-30,45
03/04 Spent: £14.09m Sold: £0 =-14,09
02/03 Spent: £28.35m Sold: £10.35m =-18
01/02 Spent: £28.17m Sold: £25.79m =-2,38
00/01 Spent: £30.60m Sold: £16.15m =-15,45
99/00 Spent: £45.54m Sold: £10.42m =-35,12

Netspend: -£506,16m since 99
transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-liverpool/alletransfers/verein/31

Because nobody in their right mind should like Scousers.

>net spend
is this the euro equivalent of bragging about how many draft picks they have?

it's the argument people use when they think they have the moral high ground against plastic clubs with a sugar daddy forgetting they also spend a lot of money and often are owned by someone equally soulless

Stop being retarded and just look at the total cost and wage bill of the current squad. This completely controls for net spend without introducing arbitrary time frames

It's meant to control for the fact that some big spenders are only enabled by selling their best players, which meaningfully offsets the impact of gross purchasing on overall squad quality

Do you have any official figures for those?
There is nothing wrong with spending money. Saying that liverpool have positive netspend and are >poor underdogs is however not correct

It reminds me of cheap ass owners in nfl who trade star players for draft picks instead of giving them contract they deserve.

also going back about 100 years more would add like £10m-£20m to the netspend

Yes. Uefa publishes them. A simple Google search will yield it. I'm not doing your work for you, but the links have been posted dozens of times in these threads, seething newfag.

Didn't know they did that thanks. It's 2017 tho the latest.

I don't know this Liverpol team you speak of

It’s almost as if you don’t lose points by drawing

Eat my butt u northern ass nigga

I'd rather not. Why u so rude my weight challenged fren?

I'm fat and grumpy with a dry ass. Post nudes pls

>Post nudes pls

Attached: you sure.jpg (1374x1425, 391K)

My ass wants it daddy

It's not that people want them to lose, it's that they cannot win. They already lost the Premier League title and they cannot possibly advance against Barca. They are in constant limbo.

Thanks for the explanation Mr. Simple Fucking Retard

damn...

Would be so much prettier without the weird USSR-style eyebrow plucking

>‘It looks like there’s a destiny that is against Liverpool. They dominated for such a long period in English football and suddenly from 89-90 until today they cannot win the Premier League. Every time there is small things against them.’

Attached: Arsene-Wenger.jpg (300x300, 16K)

Stop worshipping a bunch of strangers that died 30 years ago.
Stop singing that horrid shitty song at the beginning and end of every match.
Stop your bizarre behaviour. It's fucking cult like and extremely off putting.
Normal people would stop disliking you. Or at least hate you less.

the fact is nobody likes liverpool