ITT: Excellent double albums

Post any double album you think is twice as nice—and I'll start with Dylan's enigmatic magnum opus.

Attached: 5665F031-86F5-4922-BEBA-D78003E2BFB8.jpg (1000x1000, 616K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=BaOfBQ5uw6M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Double albums usually blow cause making 24+ songs all good is really fucking hard

Attached: ExileMainSt.jpg (500x500, 78K)

>enters the arena

Attached: e0656300-ec4a-42ae-acf5-4415967d091f._CR8,0,3664,3664_PT0_SX300__.jpg (300x300, 4K)

Attached: download (4).jpg (225x225, 6K)

That makes cases of excellence—that is, double albums someone deems excellent—even more outstanding, since it's an extended exercise in quality control. Double albums also have various other creative advantages, though, e.g. potential for more emotional impact, space for extended narratives that create continuity between tracks, etc. They can feel less like vignettes and more like contemplative experiences, even if there isn't some overarching concept.

ITT: Canonized rock albums that everyone here has listened to

This is a very good album

This is a very good album

This is a very good album

This is a very good album

Attached: 3586C98C-CAB0-43C4-9BDC-2735B5170D91.jpg (355x351, 25K)

Attached: Screenshot_20190527-024732_Chrome.jpg (913x899, 506K)

Attached: 1557126041209.jpg (4860x4860, 3.45M)

Attached: 9F810DC0-53DC-44B3-AA95-0914A453C041.jpg (355x355, 24K)

Attached: CS482356-01A-BIG.jpg (379x380, 22K)

thats neither a double album nor nice

Good albums, the others aren't.

Attached: swans are dead.jpg (500x443, 35K)

Attached: rock dream.jpg (600x600, 260K)

except it literally is, you flaming turbofaggot

Attached: 20190527_035752.jpg (720x1118, 313K)

This is a very good album.
This is a very good album.

I'm not allowed to post pictures for some reason but Goodbye Yellow Brick Road is wall to wall bangers.
London Calling has some rocky moments but pulls it all together at the end

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 6K)

Attached: 71pxyMaqlIL._SL1200_.jpg (1200x1200, 146K)

you sound like a pretentious cunt. fuck off back to RYM you egotistical prick.

extremely shit album

This is the definitive version. But the 1973 film soundtrack is worth a listen too, because the two original songs are really good and Judas absolutely fucking kills it.

Attached: 10DE326C-9B42-4D07-9EE2-EE8F6AB57103.jpg (400x400, 31K)

Attached: 00059174-D0F5-46DF-8819-3E9F44826130.jpg (355x355, 35K)

Attached: motorpsycho trust us.jpg (1668x1468, 344K)

Attached: MI0003755583.jpg (500x500, 30K)

anything under 80 minutes isn't a double album since it can fit on one disc

Attached: E7C88450-C4D5-41AF-8A96-DE58216296E3.jpg (352x355, 37K)

good choices

nice

Attached: 87AB0134-B701-43CF-8168-0EEF20B34FDE.jpg (1200x1200, 186K)

This album has grown on me so fucking much throughout the years. It's my favourite rock double album of all time now.

Attached: baroness-yellowgreen-artwork.jpg (2752x1400, 1.26M)

based scaruffi drones

Aside from Sing to God each of those albums has universal acclaim, even that is generally well repsected these days.

Big agree

Attached: can-tago-mago.jpg (600x600, 175K)

Attached: 81eMigz7JjL._SY355_.jpg (355x355, 41K)

Attached: folder.jpg (1200x1200, 326K)

Attached: tommy.jpg (887x887, 141K)

*blocks your path*

Attached: Quadro.jpg (300x300, 36K)

actually their worst album, black hole black canvas is better

The Who was the best of their contemporaries. There, I said it.

Great pick.

Greatest double album of all time

Attached: C64C8664-9547-4903-9A01-D5CF77A84B55.jpg (1024x1024, 62K)

Hardly counts as a double album, considering the 20 minute headache it ends with

Attached: 20180401_203258.png (720x718, 57K)

mother of based

this 2

Attached: 00DAB686-EE6B-4537-BCDC-7773DDD433CB.jpg (600x595, 171K)

But Dylan's best double album is pic related.

Attached: 1537250938511.jpg (1040x1050, 168K)

Attached: download-3.jpg (220x220, 12K)

This might be the definitive double album of this century for rock music so far

>if an album has a twenty minute song it’s not an album

Attached: 88c2809efa9074954b190f348269fea2fdf77d02.jpg (640x640, 215K)

But thats a triple album wtf?

Attached: 20180324_193017.png (584x585, 355K)

2 discs.

1st disc 79 minutes
2nd disc 77 minutes

Unless you're talking about the vinyl version?

nah, any album longer than 55 minutes is a double album desu

Attached: 220px-The_life_of_pablo_alternate.jpg (220x220, 19K)

>Unless you're talking about the vinyl version?
Yes, i guess everyone is talking about the vinyl versons

a shame that it hasn't been posted yet.

Attached: Twin_infinitives.gif (200x200, 4K)

If its buffed out with a 20 minute song of all the other songs mixed together then yes, it's not a good example of a DOUBLE album. Great album otherwise, but that 2nd to last song is a mess

>he completely missed the raga riff and thinks it’s nothing more than a mix of all the other songs on the album

Attached: WoweeZowee.jpg (301x300, 33K)

Attached: icanheartheheart.jpg (320x320, 25K)

this

The Who and the Kinks are severely underrated since in terms of musical innovation they were the only other British Invasion groups to rival the Beatles.

The Stones just followed the Beatles wherever they went and it was well known. They were just outstandingly competent musicians and pretty good songwriters so it didn't really matter that much to anyone at the time.

Herod's Song sounds so limp though, like someone accidentally turned the instrumentation down all the way while turning Herod's weak voice up all the way. Prefer this version

youtube.com/watch?v=BaOfBQ5uw6M

Woops disregard that, the 1973 version is pretty good. Was referring to the film version of Herod's song when I was thinking of the weak voiced one

*1970

The thing about double albums is that it doesn’t have to always be so that every track is great or worth standing on its own, it’s like in a comedy movie or tv show the main person needs a straight man, or just some kind of buffer. A flimsy track can still serve to add space to the album’s vacuum so long as it isn’t drastically awful or removing something from the album altogether. Probably a favorite example of something along this kind of thing is the Jarvoe track Volcano from Soundtracks for the Blind. In the flow of the album it’s just so startling and unexpected and deranged, and in the album’s unexpectedness and derangement works to the album’s benefit.

This album has that annoying ass "EVERYBODY MUST GET STONED" song so nah nigga, bad try.

The Wall did this pretty well I think. Not every track was going to be something that people were looking forward to hearing on a second listen, but they all had their place in the story and they were all competently done.

Misplaced sense of cringe on your part, how cringey

thats my favorite dylan song

>Dylan's enigmatic magnum opus.
I like Bob Dylan but if you find any of his work "enigmatic" then you're actually too dumb for first position four chord progressions, the most basic possible compositions.

just skip it, there's 13 other masterpieces to get into on blonde on blonde

Attached: MMLonesomeCrowdedWest.jpg (316x316, 14K)

>souless pleb

not even OP but enigmatic seems like a fitting description for blonde on blonde lyrically. also i think you severely overestimate people's ability to get into roots rock, especially the further we drift from folk, blues, and country in modern music.

Attached: 220px-Ween-ThePod.jpg (220x214, 18K)

Attached: E0A41270-9640-49DB-86B3-4928774688C0.png (300x300, 123K)

i heard this right when it came out and thought it was hot trash. maybe i'll give it another listen