Dude the revolution was...LE BAD

>dude the revolution was...LE BAD
Sigh, fuck this chud game.

Attached: assassins-creed-unity.jpg (1500x2127, 2.29M)

we wuz farench an shiet

It was bad.

Assassin's Creed Unity is one of the only games in the franchise worth playing and revisiting. It's the last good game in the series as well. There's much more emphasis placed on stealth gameplay. Assassin's Creed Unity is more of an evolution of the original Assassin's Creed. Chain killing has been removed, though you can still parry and stagger enemies in open combat. Unity has plenty of weapon variety and customization options for the character. Pole weapons, axes, one handed swords, maces, cleavers, much more. Though you have to enter numerous sub menus just to change your gear. The game needed some sort of radial menu to swap out weapons.

The story isn't too bad either. As a character, Arno doesn't amount to much more than a retread of Ezio in Assassin's Creed II. I liked the situations that Arno was placed in, however. Unity was pretty interesting if you find the time period of the French Revolution interesting. For a good chunk of the game, you're on the side of the French Royalists who defend the monarchy. Some missions have you doing activities such as destroying letters of correspondence between King Louis XVI and the Parisian leader of the Assassins, there's another mission where you put a stop to an assassination attempt on King Louis XVI, and you bring an end to the Reign of Terror when you capture a stereotypical demonized Robespierre. In Assassin's Creed Unity, the Reign of Terror is portrayed as though it were some sort of Templar conspiracy to gain control of the middle class through paranoia. When Unity first released around the end of 2014, there were a few leftist French critics who condemned the game for fueling counter-revolutionary narratives, but Arno speaks in favor of the French Revolution when he talks back to his assassin mentors from time to time, so the game isn't wholly counter-revolutionary.

Attached: 1542721823935.jpg (1920x1080, 1.48M)

It's a natural course of action for conspiracy theory cliches (Unity's depiction of the Reign of Terror) to come about through a counter-revolutionary narrative, and conspiracy theories are part of what made the original Assassin's Creed compelling. If anyone claims that Assassin's Creed Unity is purely counter-revolutionary it just exposes that person as short-sighted.

If there is anything weak about Unity's story, then it all comes down to Arno and his Romeo/Juliet romance with Élise . Arno is born to an Assassin father, then later on Arno is orphaned and the Parisian Templar leader adopts him. Arno's adopted father has a daughter (Élise) and she eventually joins the Templar cause while Arno follows in his biological father's footsteps. Even though Arno and Élise are of two different factions they love each other. As the French Revolution comes to a head, the Parisian Assassin leader and the Parisian Templar leader wish to secure their power structures so they sort of come to a temporary truce. And with Arno as protagonist, we see the story through his eyes and he longs for the days of security from his childhood. That's also why Unity gives the impression that the populist revolutionary movements are wrong, though some of the antagonists in the game have compelling viewpoints. There was plenty of nuance in the story. Arno was just too weak of a protagonist. Ezio playboy 2.0 doesn't fit this type of story that well. A more ideologically driven protagonist could navigate the mess of the French Revolution and find a better alternative. Unity raised a lot of questions regarding stagnation, extremism, corruption etc but everything gets swept under the rug in favor of Arno's romance with Élise.

Attached: AC Unity Faces.webm (1280x720, 1.46M)

REVOLUTION CREATED BY ROTHCHILD

YOUR EBIN REVOLUTION WAS CREATED BY BANKERS LMAO

cringe shill

>implying it wasn't
ok shmuel

Go back to the grave, Robespierre

I fucking hated Ezio, and Connor was my favourite
Arno is somewhere in the middle, not great but not terrible

Based. I really wish ac went in more of a hitman style game rather than the witcher style games. Ac unitys failure was what made ubisoft panic and copy the witcher 3

That’s not the moral of the story. Arno is embroiled in plans of both loyalists and revolutionaries and through interacting with them and being betrayed by them he realizes that dogma is not the way no matter which side you are. Both the Assassins and the Templars try to take advantage of the turmoil but get lost in the smell of their own idealistic farts. Arno chooses to follow only his heart and his own passion to fight for what’s right. That’s the moral message. And it’s very similar to AC1s anti dogma messaging as well. Unity is actually a really great story.

Feminism is a force for good
Because even though the monarchy was reestablished it spread liberal ideas in France and later in all of Europe, and it marked the end for absolutism. I don't expect a website full of literal nazi incels to understand that, though.

Shut up cracker simpcel

Doesn’t look like an anglogermcuck to me

Attached: 4A6C537F-4E46-49BE-B3D9-A4339A1A708D.png (640x393, 225.91K)

The fuck? He literally does everything for the sake of pussy.

Before I take your opinion into consideration I need to know what you thought of Black Flag

None of what I said contradicts that.

How is pussy "what's right"?

Oh god the Romanian schizo is back
Take your pills

Because in the end he does do what’s right. Stop oversimplifying shit retard.

>Connor was my favourite
I dont think Detroit Become Human was an Assassins Creed game

fucking connor? you're sure you didn't just like the way he used an axe and a hidden blade? connor fucking sucks

Why, it was like reading about France and the French, before the ever memorable and blessed Revolution, which swept a thousand years of such villany away in one swift tidal-wave of blood—one: a settlement of that hoary debt in the proportion of half a drop of blood for each hogshead of it that had been pressed by slow tortures out of that people in the weary stretch of ten centuries of wrong and shame and misery the like of which was not to be mated but in hell. There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

>All these rose colored goggles
Did you guys forget the part about four to five enemies that magically teleport to your location, and then proceed to hack away at you?

Attached: Just saying, fam.jpg (740x370, 37.19K)

The French Revolution was the bourgeois revolution, idiots

>literally got to a point people started calling it the "reign of terror"
>all smiles though

If anything I appreciate that Ubisoft at least tried to make the assassin vs Templar battle a bit more morally ambiguous in unity, rogue and three to an extent.

the terror is worst of any famine, at any moment even a single person who hate you can denunce and without proofs sending you to death.

this is true terror, can0t trust anymore your family and friends and live in a constant state of paranoia.
famine can just kill you, the terror is gonna destroy everything you love

communism elitarianism.
who controlled the state was a group of intellectuals

the burggeos supported Napolen

French here
4 is the only AC worth playing
Bye

>4 is the only one I played

If you can ignore retarded story and just want to enjoy running around the well crafted Paris than it is a solid game, better than woke rpg trash ubishit spews now.

Communism wouldn't be a thing for another 100 years and Napoleon was on the revolutionary side. You don't know anything about history or politics (or spelling).

France is a failed state. It has been since the revolution. They're on their what, 5th Republic now?

4 is barely even an AC
which makes it feel weird when they jam AC elements into it

It's been 5th republic for nearly 80 years

then call it proto-communism
a group of intellectuals use the oppressed class to obtain power and create a terror state.

>napoleon
backstabbed them at the first moment

>people shill 4 a lot
>praise the story and the ship combat most of all
>play it
>yeah ok story is pretty good for an AC game
>ship combat is the worst experience I've ever had in a video game, especially the stealth ship sections holy shit
I have no clue how any human being can enjoy the ship gameplay, it's less complex than even the basic melee combat, which is really saying something, and it's so fucking slow.

>then call it proto-communism
No, I won't, because it's literally the establishment of liberal capitalist ideals.
>a group of intellectuals use the oppressed class to obtain power and create a terror state.
Like I said, you are entirely politically ignorant.
>backstabbed them at the first moment
And historically ignorant.

Dude you are full retard, revolution was anything but communist as there were no conditions to make communist workers state.
90% of people were poor farmers who wanted more equal and liberal state, you are fucking retarded.

lmao this reads like
>mostly peaceful burnings
guess the more things change, the more they stay the same

>No, I won't, because it's literally the establishment of liberal capitalist ideals.
it's absolute nothing

was a terror states that wanted to eradicate all the religion and french culture

exatly the goal of communism
>Like I said, you are entirely politically ignorant.
and you are a political fanatics
communism is contolled by an elite of intellectuals who use an oppressed class as their slaves to obtain power.

workers, poors, can0t decide nothing
>And historically ignorant
fucking retard and is even in this game

Napoleon was an opportunistic who joined the revolution to obtain ranks and then bacjstabbed all their bullshit and declared himself emperor

>French here

Attached: c00.png (800x800, 878.86K)

communsim is an oligarchy

that cabal don't care if you are a peasant or a worker just want to use you to obtain power

ordinary people rising up against authoritarian leaders wasnt invented in 1700s france dumbass

>resident schizo thinks the assassins vs templars plot is a realistic depiction of history

>was a terror states that wanted to eradicate all the religion and french culture
>exatly the goal of communism
You are beyond retarded
There isn't even anything to say except that you're wrong about literally every single thing in every possible way
Pick up any book at all

What you're describing is by definition not communism.

You have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about, i mean fucking zero.
Its like explaining to village idiot who doesnt know how to count that 8/4=2

>dude the revolution was...LE BAD

Attached: 1518728574942.jpg (1776x1000, 783.62K)

No communist revolution has ever ended with a worker state though. It always ends up with the leaders who riled up the masses taking over and becoming the new oppressors while the poor farmers just get killed or put back on farms

what communist think is not communism is reality.

communism in reality was a disctatorship of a group of intellectuals who used a terror state to keep the power

total equal to the french revolution.

both hate religion
both hate culture
and both wanted export their revolution everywhere.
and both controlled by pedos

>gommunism is when capitalism
the absolute state of americans

If a kid dying of infected rat bites after a long period of neglect makes you cry, wait until you hear about his father's subjects

All you've proved thus far is that the liberal state and the socialist state were both born from revolution

That doesnt have anything to do with retarded shit of your previous post.

Why are you trying to argue about something you have absolutely no idea about?
Open some 5 minute youtube video or wikipedia page, it will take you less time than to write these abortions of post.

communism is when an elite use the current victmin to obtain power and create a terror state.

>political system is when the economy
the absolute state of shitskins
liberal was england and usa
in france a single gov officier could steal all your money and propriety

the communism dream

Technically communism is still capitalism because any communist country will be forced to act within a global capitalist framework. Its a doomed ideology

>wikipedia
this is why you are retard

>your previous post.
different user

So communism is Nazi Germany?
You are retarded schizo.

Dude, you are too retarded to even respond to.
You lack the most basic knowledge to even argue about french revolution, i mean how can you be so confident while being so utterly retarded.

That's what happens when you go down the path of "I refuse to learn what communism actually is lest it infect me, but I know that it's everything bad"

>So communism is Nazi Germany?
He'd probably actually say yes

>So communism is Nazi Germany?
who the fuck speak about nazi germany?

why commies so obsessed with Nazi?
>Dude, you are too retarded to even respond to
aka i can0t argue back
stop bitching like a faggot

>liberal was england and usa
Ah yes, monarchistic England, the country that the USA rebelled against in order to found a country on liberal values, was exactly as liberal as the USA. But the French Revolution, based on the ideals of the American revolution, was actually communist.

This is also retarded.

YES
LIBERALISM BORN UNDER A MONARCHY

LIBERALISM NEVER TRIED TO ERADICATE ITS OWN CULTURE AND RELIGION

LIBERALISM NEVER SEND PEOPLE TO DEAD FOR AN ANONYMOUS DENUNCE

ETC..
LIBERALISM DON'T CARE

England was a monarchy at the time. Hardly liberal.