Netflix tries to do a melodramatic woke hit-piece on Jimmy Savile

kill yourself

> Viewers end up respecting his sheer charismatic working class one-of-our-own personality
>viewers
You mean Yea Forums-browsing nonces who aren’t willing to throw one of their own kind under the bus

Is this the first time Americans have heard of Jimmy Saville? It's the only explanation for these retarded defenses of him that have been appearing.

He looks so much like my dad, I hate that. My dad was a notorious pedophile too. He bought my mom when she was 13 from her crackhead parents for $300 when he was 35 and kept her prisoner in his home deep in the country where no one could help and kept her there for 4 years until she escaped. Also he killed at least 12 people that I'm aware of. Good thing he is dead now. I found one of the dead bodies down by the creek buried in a shallow grave

No. It's just pedos, shills, and contrarians looking for (you)'s.

seriously though, his charity helped so many people, he overall created more joy than misery and did more good than bad. logically without female emotional thinking that makes him a good person, and being a good person means he deserves to take a bit back in my opinion

>Saville threads always pruned and deleted
What are the mods hiding?

Attached: 1649017062592.png (545x530, 207.68K)

proofs? what’s his name?

>pruned and deleted
this is the first time its ever said this for me. it always said before error specified thread doesnt exist. i assumed it was a 4chanx thing. what gives?

Attached: 1616293610063.jpg (660x574, 30.86K)

It's hard to disagree with that logic. His overall output on this earth was a net positive by far.

Average anglo utilitarian

He didn't care about how much people he helped. It was all work to gain access to his victims.

>Bros, why was the roof of the hospital falling on the paraplegics?

Attached: Angrymangay.jpg (500x333, 13.28K)

>Conservative traditional working class straight white male brings joy and good to millions of fellow white people
>Liberals seethe and find a way to cancel him

It's a regular occurrence nowadays.

even if he meant it, it doesn’t make up for doing shit like that. doing good things isn’t a credit system you exchange for doing horrible things

Any kinos where the villain cares about karma and tries his hardest to do good to justify his bad actions? Always wanted to see a villain like this and never realized jimmy was this but in real life.

People like you is why the church got away with so much, people liked %[thing] so the pedofile stuff wasn’t really that bad, was it?
95% of god dam person are fucking npcs. That’s why celebs are worth so much to a studio, even if they can’t act,

Attached: 68BB7382-DE7B-4740-9C3A-8F78CE4A2426.jpg (1024x427, 49.42K)

that's a very jewish post

In the documentary he seemed to think that doing all those good deeds would be enough to nullify diddling kids and go to heaven.

He was a smoker, should've been killed for that

>the church
this meme again. they literally rape less than school teachers and that shit is also covered up constantly with teachers being transferred. just stfu

hi newfren

>they literally rape less than school teachers
Which makes rape okay? Kill yourself.

No, it’s just you redditors only ever focus on one of those things. Teachers molesting is such a huge problem in comparison to priests in the 80s doing it but the media never talks about it.

School teachers don’t get covered up retard, the problem with the church was the decades long cover ups of repeat offenders.
You are just repeating church as agency talking points

>Teachers molesting is such a huge problem in comparison
Doubt.
> to priests in the 80s doing i
>80s
Stop acting like it’s a solved problem, they just settled some cases that happened in the naughts

Attached: ECE34BAA-2BD9-4307-9E8D-C49D54169E2B.jpg (1440x1420, 716.64K)

Is this why there's been constant Savile spam the last few days?

those kids probably deserved it

psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/do-the-right-thing/201808/separating-facts-about-clergy-abuse-fiction
>teacher abuse isn’t covered up
hahahah lmfao. as always the truth comes out, you don’t give a fuck about child abuse.

thesun.co.uk/news/14484053/elite-schools-covered-up-sex-abuse-harassment-cops/

this is one example but it happens constantly, if you ever had a teacher suddenly transfer this is usually why.
the vast majority of the cases are if from back then because since there’s been rules implemented so they basically can’t be alone with kids anymore

Teachers actually provide a benefit to people though.

so it’s okay when they do it?

>this is usually why
based assoomer

considering its permanently bannable content not really

Literally gave you an article showing that they do this. It’s weird how you will easily accept this is done with the church, but suddenly it’s really hard to convince you when it’s a secular institution. As if pedophiles aren’t everywhere protecting eachother, no, it’s just le religious people because child abuse is a political weapon after all to attack things you don’t like. Just ignore it when it’s something you do.

does it even cross your mind that having the system need to restrain pastors from being alone with kids isnt a good solution.

>one example
>this is usually why
its ok to list evidence but broadly generalizing as "this is usually why" is not and i have no reason to believe your authority over any one elses, especially over my own beliefs

Why? If you’re worried about some of them becoming pastors to abuse children, that will dissuade them. If they can’t get easy access it’s less attractive to them to become priests in the first place. People also don’t talk about how the overwhelming majority of sexual abuse cases with priests are with homosexual ones as well. If they screened out the fags abuse would drop by like 80%

he must have spent thousands and thousands of boring hours doing hospital work just to diddle some kids. It seems like a huge amount of trouble when he could have just paid some young prostitutes to dress up in schoolgirl outfits.

The documentary was dogshit because they literally had one victim on screen talk about the abuse, literally all other accusations were secondhand. They also didn't talk about the necrophilia accusations at all. If he molested 400 people, you can get more than 1 goddamn person to show up on camera to talk about it.

newfag

>schools don’t do that
>here’s an article detailing a ton of schools that did
you already got btfo here so this just seems like grasping at straws

theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/17/child-sexual-abuse-in-schools-often-an-open-secret-says-inquiry

lbc.co.uk/news/schools-are-covering-up-cases-of-grooming-and-sex-abuse-by-staff-inquiry-finds/

newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles

literally a google search will give you a ton of cases easily

It was their fault for downplaying the actual shit he did and not even really talking about the result it had on the BBC.

>Why
an issue so rampant that rather than "changing their hiring process" they have to put shackles on the people hired. why do you defend institutions with ingrained pedophilia, and if not "Defending them" why do you try to mitigate their impact by saying "Well other people do it too" as if that is any kind of defense or appropriate response. this is why corporate organized religion sucks

>schools don’t do that
never said that, i only said dont make broad, BROAD brush strokes of "This is usually why"

I never said others doing it makes it okay. I’ve at this point given a ton of articles about how teachers are far more likely to abuse and do it more, and that it’s also frequently covered up, and you ignore it. You ignore it and then say organised religion is bad despite all the shit i’ve posted. You are 100% biased and only see child abuse in places you want to, which actually makes you a pretty shitty person. I never defended the church for what they did, I just pointed out they are a much smaller problem than schools and you didn’t like me doing that. And yes, changing the access they have to kids dissuades pedos from becoming priests and stops pedophile priests having access to children.

>The best available data reports that 4 percent of Catholic priests sexually violated a minor child during the last half of the 20th century with the peak level of abuse being in the 1970s and dropping off dramatically by the early 1980s. And in the recent Pennsylvania grand jury report only two cases were reported in the past dozen years that were already known and dealt with by authorities (thus the grand jury report is about historical issues and not about current problems of active clerical abuse now).

>Putting clergy abuse in context, research from the US Department of Education found that about 5-7 percent of public school teachers engaged in similar sexually abusive behavior with their students during a similar time frame. While no comprehensive studies have been conducted with most other religious traditions, a small scale study that I was involved with found that 4 percent of Anglican priests had violated minors in western Canada and many reports have mentioned that clerical abuse of minors is common with other religious leaders and clerics as well.

But schools don’t have a systemic problem, just priests lol

>But schools don’t have a systemic problem
never said that here, in this chain of replies, only that having the system itself act as the deterrent is not a good solution.

Be honest, how much is the church paying you to do this?

what the church did was disgusting and horrible as i’ve already said, it’s just funny seeing you cope to only attack religion when i’ve posted proof teachers are way worse with this shit

>ou ignore it and then say organised religion is bad despite all the shit i’ve posted
i say that because it isnt a fucking competition, both are bad my man, BOTH are bad, youre trying to mitigate the damage

Why? It’s worked well
as you can see way less abuse than there used to be. let me guess the only solution is dismantling the entire thing for whatever reason, even though you can give me a good excuse for that?

like, let me continue, is it a good solution that pastors basically arent allowed to be alone with kids? absolutely not, is it also a good thing that it is basically impossible to fire tenured teachers without extreme and overwhelming evidence? absolutely not. in both these cases the issues are so ingrained into their institutions that its easier to cover it up than it is to make any dramatic changes

I agree it’s just weird that people on talk about one and not the other

>Why? It’s worked well
when looking at a perfectly black box from the outside, everything they say is working on the inside seems pretty good

It had led to way less children being abused, so why is it bad?

>Noncing allegations hounded Saville his entire life
>still managed to maintain a friendship with royals and politicians, and keep a job at the BBC which covered up basically every act of kiddy fiddling that happened in the 70s

Really makes you think huh

Faaaake

please see
the truth is that there is NO WAY you can possibly know its working

oh ok that stats are just a conspiracy and nothing I can say will change your mind because all the evidence is fake. lmao. it doesn’t matter if way fewer kids are abused, what matters is destroying le heckin christcucks

This is a funny meme

>because all the evidence is fake
do you really think churches have any kind of self interest to truly report sexual abuse numbers?

literally /pol/tard tier argumentative tactics. I can cite actual stats from an article but it doesn’t matter because they’re faked so no amount of information can threaten your position.

>Yea Forums convinced all elites are pedophiles
>allegations finally come out in the hundreds about an individual with extensive connections to powerful people who could quite easily cover up his degeneracy
>”noooo it’s not true there’s no evidence these bitches are crazy they just want money and fame! Saville was actually based, why are they dragging his name through the dirt!!”
What did they mean by this?

Where are you getting that these stats come out of the church from? Why isn’t the same true for teachers also?

>Why isn’t the same true for teachers also
again, why does it matter

Not him but there have been a ton of independent inquiries and it’s not the 70s anymore, people who are abused can access the police a lot easier and they blow the whistle far more often. Child abuse is way less of an issue everywhere than it was years ago.

because nothing you say makes sense. they make drastic changes, let the police investigate them, the rates of abuse drop, but oh wait the stats are fake even though you have zero actual evidence for that claim whatsoever, so I can dismiss it without evidence.